Posted on 11/25/2003 8:54:56 AM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
ANCIENT PHONICIAN-HEBREW VOWELS The following ancient witnesses show that the Jewish writing didn't used the actual system of points for indicating the vowels, but specific characters: the character 
sounded as ah, the character 
sounded as eh, the letter 
had two sounds Y/J and ee, as in yearly/January; the character 
sounded as oh, the character 
sound as Uh and as V
THE (click to enlarge image) STELE OF KILAMU
THE SILOE INSCRIPTION
Certainly, the use of points in the Stele of Kilamu and in the Siloe inscription is to separate the words.
The Vowels were there all the time In all these writings, from around 1.000 before Christ till the year 134 after Christ, we see that the shape of the letter O was kept without change (round/oval), expressing the shape on an eye, from where its name comes. Nobody can explain why it was changed abruptly to the shape of an allusive hand!.
THE 4 VOWELS OF THE NAME OF GOD (Wars of the Jews, 5,5,7) Of course, the abrupt change was made by the evil scribes and satanic sects in order to hide the name of God. The Jews priest Flavius Josephus testifies that the name of God wore in the crown of the High Priest consists of four vowels; most of the tables of equivalence of characters of the Middle East agree with Josephus and the inscriptions found:
Clearly, Josephus saw in the crown of the High Priest the four vowels: I E U E Within the box of the phylactery are verses of the Old Testament to be remembered by the Jews: the letter Shin (S) remembers that the name of God has that letter
So, returning the Shin to the vowels, It yields: I E The Phylactery is an device to remember the meaning of what is writing in it THE MEANING OF THE NAME OF GOD In several places in the Old Testament is revealed the meaning of the name of God, for instance, Jeremias 34:8-16 
|
The Word of God Came to Jeramias, This is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: I made a covenant with your forefathers when I brought them out of Egypt, out of the land of Slavery, I said: every seventh year every of you must free any fellow Hebrew how has sold himself to you. After he has served you six years, you must let him go free. Your fathers, however, did not listen to me or pay attention to me. Recently you repented and did what is right in my sight. Each of you proclaim freedom to his countrymen. You may even made a covenant before me in the house that bears my name. But you have turned around and profaned my name; each of you has turned back the male and female slaves you had set free to go where they wished. You have forced them to be your slaves again. |
It is clear: They profaned the name of God because they did the opposite to what the name of God means: freedom, salvation or savior, as the king David had claimed some years before, Psalm 54:1: Save me, O God, by your name The name of God found in the Dead Sea Scroll means Savior (Jesha or Jasha):
As one can easily check in variants of the ancient shamek (S):
The following table shows clearly that the third character is not a vav but a shamek
Certainly it was a very common practice to chop characters:
The WORD JESÚS is a two word: JES, which means male, and US which means comes to help or comes to save (See Strong's Concordance 05789), therefore JESUS means SAVIOR
So, Isaias 43:3 really says: I am the Lord, your God, the Saint of Israel, I am your JESUS So, the change made by the evil rabies was simple:
But, What Simple, any Concordance shows that 
means?
means ruin, calamity, mischief; therefore
means: He who brings ruin, calamity, mischief They evil scribes converted the holy name into a blasphemous name
for that reason, Isaias anciently said (Romans 2:24): The Evil Jews make that the The archeological findings in Ugarit, Lachish, and around the World show that 
is a very dirty and wicked deity:
http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/Opera/1624/yah.html
http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/Opera/1624/powers.html
Interestingly, in Pithos A from Kuntillet Ajrud (a caravanserai in eastern Sinai) a painting of two ibexes nibbling on a sacred tree is accompanied by an inscription mentioning "Yahweh of Samaria and his asherah" (Taylor p. 32).
The tree and the Goat Yah of Gat is the dirty practice of having sexual with animals
Asherah produces homosexuality and sexual aberration
There is also the surprising evidence of papyri from Elephantine, Egypt, where there was an important Jewish colony. The documents show that these Jews paid dues to the temple in Jerusalem. But the name of their own temple was Anat/Jaho. Anat is a Hittite goddess, daughter of Ashera, sister of Baal. And these papyri are, relatively speaking, very modern - they date from around 400 BC
It is uncertain whether El-berith ("God of the covenant") in Judges 9.46 refers to Yahweh, for this deity seems to be the same as Baal-berith in Judges 8.33; Judges 9.4, and may be a Canaanite god. On the other hand, Baal, which means "lord," was sometimes used of Yahweh in early times without necessarily always identifying him with the Canaanite god Baal. In 1 Chronicles 12.6, there is the personal name Bealiah, "Yah is Baal" (cf. yhwb>l on an unpublished seal). Saul and Jonathan, who were worshipers of Yahweh, had sons named, respectively, Esh-baal and Merib-baal (1 Chronicles 8.33–34), which were changed by editors to Ish-bosheth and Mephibosheth (2 Samuel 2.8; 2 Samuel 9.6; etc.), in which "bosheth" ("shame") was substituted for "Baal." Jerubbaal (Jerubbesheth in 2 Samuel 11.21), Gideon’s other name, is probably to be explained similarly, notwithstanding the forced explanation in Judges 6.31–32. David also had a son named Beeliada (b>lyd>, 1 Chronicles 14.7), probably identical with Eliada in other lists. Hosea 2.16 says that Israel will call God "my husband" (lit. "my man") and no longer "my Baal" (i.e., "my lord," another word for husband), which may imply that some Israelites addressed God in the latter way.
Both God’s holiness and his relation to his people are reflected in the phrase "
In Babylon Yahu was the god of fertility
[1.48] for the resting-place of their divinities,
[1.49] for a memorial of all their names,
[1.50] as a worshipper of Nebo, Yav and Istar,
:
[4.56] in Borsippa I erected:
[4.57] to the god Yav who confers
[4.58] the fertilizing rain upon my land,
[4.59, 60] his house (also) in Borsippa I strongly built:
[4.61] to the Moon-god who upholds
[4.62] the fulness of my prosperity
THE SON OF GOD In many ways is said that the Son of God is the God of the Jews, let’s see some: Aaron took what they handed him and made it into a son of a bull (Exodus 32:4) It is clear, Aaron didn’t shape a bull but his son, since they knew that the God of Israel was the Son of God. Then the The The blue Lord is the Son and the red Lord is the Father. Psalm 45:6,7 and Psalm 2 mention God Son and God Father, Your throne, o You love righteousness and hate wickedness; therefore God Ask to me, and I will give you the nations and the earth In the days of the Christian Apostle, Psalm 102 said that the Son of God set the foundation of the world and extended the heavens:
But about the Son, he says: (Hebrew 1:10) In the beginning, O And the heavens are the work of your hands Of course, the evil scribes (Jeremias 8:8) changed this verse, deleting the reference to the Son: In the beginning you laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands(102:26) in the following site you should find a work that show some of the alterations made by the evil scribes
http://www.angelfire.com/tv/God/GOD.html
|
.. the lying pen of the scribes changed the Law of the Lord into lie.. The wise rejected the Word of the Lord (Jeremias 8:8,9) … for they have rejected the Law of the Lord Almighty and spurned the Word of the Holy One of Israel (Isaias 5:24) |
Hopely, some ancient documents as the Septuagint, the writings of Flavius Josephus, the New Testament and the inner discrepancies among some passages of the Old Testament help us to be aware, for instance:
|
Exodus 6:2 God also said to Moses: I am the Lord. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty, but by my name the Lord I did not make myself known to them |
Genesis 15:7 He also said to Abram, "I am the Lord …" One contradicts the other |
The Jewish priest Flavius Josephus told to the Greek the common knowledge of the Jewish about the Son of God, in his famous discourse to the Greek about the Hades
|
6. For all men, the just as well as the unjust, shall be brought before God the word: for to him hath the Father committed all judgment : and he, in order to fulfill the will of his Father, shall come as Judge, whom we call Christ. For Minos and Rhadamanthus are not the judges, as you Greeks do suppose, but he whom God and the Father hath glorified: Concerning Whom We Have Elsewhere Given A More Particular Account, For The Sake Of Those Who Seek After Truth. This person, exercising the righteous judgment of the Father towards all men, hath prepared a just sentence for every one, according to his works; at whose judgment-seat when all men, and angels, and demons shall stand, they will send forth one voice, and say, Just Is Thy Judgment; the rejoinder to which will bring a just sentence upon both parties, by giving justly to those that have done well an everlasting fruition |
Josephus drew this knowledge from the Old Testament of his days, which the evil scribes changed in order to kick the Son of God out of the Old Testament. THE SON MADE THE WORLD The main verb used in Genesis 1 is TO CREATE and the main one used in Genesis 2 is TO MAKE
|
GENESIS 1:1 In the Beginning God created the heaven and the earth |
GENESIS 2:4 When the Lord God made the earth and the heavens |
The heaven was created first than the earth but the earth was made first than the heavens.
God created but the Lord God made The two different verbs refer to two different things:
|
TO CREATE To come into existence Adam and Eve were created in the same 6th day |
TO MAKE To materialize (Hebrew 11:3) Adam was materialized first and then Eve |
it is clearly declared that the Son made (materialized) the created world:
|
But about the Son, He says: In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundation of the earth, and the heaven are the work of your hands (Hebrew 1:8-10) And for whom He made the Universe (1:2) All the things were made by him (John 1:1) |
So, the following passages refer to the Son: I made the earth and created man upon it, my own hands stretched out the heavens (Isaias 45:12) Where were you when I laid the earth’s foundations? (Job 38) You alone are the Lord, you made the heavens (Nehemias 9:6) Jesus Christ says that no man has seen the Father No one has ever seen God (John 1:18, 1John 4:12) No one has seen the Father, except the one who came from God, this has seen the Father (John 6:46) Among many other cases, in the following ones the Son God was seen:
|
Gen 18:1 |
The Lord appeared to Abraham |
Exodus 24:9:11 |
And they saw the God of Israel |
Exodus 33:11,18 |
And the Lord spoke to Moses face to face |
Job 42:5 |
Now my eyes see you |
Isaias 6:1 |
And Isaias saw the Lord |
Daniel 3:25 |
Nabuchadneizer saw the Son of God |
Jesus Christ told to the children of Jerusalem:
|
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, continuously I wanted to gather your children together, as the hen gathers her chicken under her wings, but you didn’t want. (Matthew 23:37) |
That he was who spoke to Jerusalem in Jeremias 35:
|
And it came the word of the Lord to Jeremias, saying: the Lord of the host has said, God of Israel: Go and tell to the men of Judah and the children of Jerusalem… I have spoken to you from early and continuously, but you didn’t paid attention to me. I sent to you my servants the prophets… but you didn’t want(Jeremias 35:12+) |
THE DEVIL TEMPTED THE SON, NO THE FATHER
|
Matthew 4 The Jesus was led by the Spirit to the desert to be tempted by the devil |
Luke 4 Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan, and was led by the Spirit to the desert for forty days, and he was tempted by the devil |
Jesus not only was the Son of God, by the Lord and the God of the Devil, since he said: YOU DEVIL So, clearly, Deuteronomy 6:16 refers to the Son, not to the Father THE SON IS THE ONLY SAVIOR
|
Acts 4:12 Salvation is not found in no one else |
Isaías 43:11 I am the Lord, and apart from me there is not Savior |
Dear reader, the only way to the Father is his only begotten Son, whose name means SAVIOR, any other name that don’t means SAVIOR, such as Yahshua, Jesu, Yaohushua, Jeshua, refers to the Anti-Christ, that denies that God came in flesh.
Be careful with the fables of the Judaism: the evil branch of the Jews fight to deceive the just branch of the Jews; Jesus says that the evil branch are sons of the Devil (John 8:44), and therefore Synagogues of Satan (Revelation 2:9), don’t follow them unless that you want to perish with them in the eternal fire.
Very High Weirdness you found there!
YHWH is Baal, the One Who Ruins -- the Hebrews really worshipped IESUS!
Evil Jewish scribes altered the text of the Old Testament in order to deny that IESUS incarnated to save man!
Dear reader, the only way to the Father is his only begotten Son, whose name means SAVIOR, any other name that don’t means SAVIOR, such as Yahshua, Jesu, Yaohushua, Jeshua, refers to the Anti-Christ, that denies that God came in flesh.
We'd better get busy correcting all the errors in our Bibles.
Are they talking about the Adam Shapiro types? Otherwise, Ack! If FR had a "more wacko than Jacko" award, this article would win. And there's pretty stiff competition from the "Jews poison Pali candy" and "IDF employs seductive strippers" corner of the net. Must be all of those "evil Rabbis" playing with the fonts and colors. No doubt they manipulated the URLs to make all of the images disappear too. :-/
This graph of ' lineage [right column] is a historical reconstruction based on information in the opening paragraph of his autobiography & other works. He claims to have recorded his genealogy "as I have found it described in the public records" [ 1]. But when coordinated with historical information about the that he himself reports in his other works [left four columns] there are some obvious major generational discrepancies in his family tree. Josephus' count of his ancestors' generations would make him a fourth cousin of 's 2nd wife, , who died sixty-eight years before he was born! Josephus' reports of his own experiences make it more probable that he was at most a sixth or, more likely, a seventh cousin of his near contemporary Herod , who was king of Iturea [southern Lebanon] in the decades surrounding the Jewish-Roman war of 66-70 CE.
Either Josephus' memory or his family records were clearly confused. He begins by claiming: "My grandfather's father was named Simon, with the addition of Psellus," but goes on to represent this Simon Psellus as his "grandfather" Joseph's great-grandfather. Even so, he does not list enough generations between himself & Simon's grandson [Matthew Curtus], if he is correct in claiming that the latter was born the first year that was high priest. According to Josephus' dating, this Matthew's "son" Joseph would have been born when Matthew was 66. While not impossible, it is more likely that Josephus or some previous scribe overlooked a generation "in the public records" of the priestly courses of . This would have been particularly easy to do, if Matthew Curtus' son & grandson were both named Joseph.
Josephus was probably correct in recalling that his own grandfather was named Joseph. But he is just as probably mistaken in identifying his grandfather with Matthew Curtus' son (or grandson) Joseph. There is no good reason to question Josephus' report that his own father, Matthew, was born in the last year of ' reign [6 CE]. But in order for this Matthew to be the son of a Joseph who was born in the last year of Queen 's reign [68 BCE], the father would have been 74 years old when he sired a son. While not beyond biological credibility, it is more likely that at least one or, more likely, two generations were dropped in Josephus' hasty recounting of his family's history at the beginning of his apologetical autobiography. Since Josephus recalled that his family repeatedly named fathers & sons alternately, Matthew & Joseph---witness himself & his father & Matthew Curtus & his "son"---it is quite possible that Josephus forgot or overlooked such a pair in his reckoning. One advantage of this solution to the chronological questions raised by Josephus' family tree, is that it allows Josephus to be put in the same generation as his chronological contemporaries.
There are three ways to interpret Josephus' report of his family history: skeptically, literally, or genealogically. Given the chronological gaps & Josephus' penchant for defending himself, it would be easy to reject his family tree as folklore or fabrication. But his insistence that he based it "on public records" makes this the least likely solution. Priestly lineage was zealously preserved by Jerusalem's conservative ruling aristocracy. Before the Jewish-Roman war, it was the basis of a priest's job & social position; and it was used to regulate the priestly courses for more than a century after the destruction of Jerusalem's temple. If Josephus was known not to be of Hasmonean lineage, it is unlikely that he would have dared to have publicized himself as such in writing to his contemporary detractors, who were vocal & many.
While a literal interpretation of Josephus' family tree is not beyond belief, it stretches the biological imagination & raises biographical questions that are historically unanswerable. Did the males of Josephus' family marry late or often? Did they remain sexually active in old age? Did Josephus come from a line of priests that was orphaned young? If so, who raised & trained them? If Josephus' forebears had such exceptional longevity when compared with the Hasmoneans & Herodians he uses to date their birth, why does he fail to mention it?
While the revised genealogical reconstruction of Josephus' ancestry presented above is beyond historical proof, it at least makes historical sense out of the information he presents. My experience in tracking down & filling in gaps in the family genealogy that I inherited from my own grandmother convinces me that this is the most plausible interpretation of Josephus' family data.
Note: this topic is from 11/25/2003. Thanks Hermann the Cherusker.
The Messiah Ancient Hebrew name is IEUESHUO not Jesus plus IEUE is said as eeh-eh-ooh-eh in Ancient Hebrew and I have the Paleo Hebrew Alphabet from IEUE website there is A B C D E F G H I K L M N O P Q R S T U X and Z but no J V W and Y the letter W was invented by the Anglo-Saxons in the 13th century and Ancient Hebrew didn’t have the letter Y the Y came later and it was a Italian man that invented the letter J in 1524 and wasn’t used in English language until the 17th century and the V came in 15th century plus Jesus is said in other languages as Yeshu and Yeshu and Jesu and Jesus is said as Yeshu in Modern translations and Yeshu means may his name and memory be blotted out this happened because the Jews are responsible for lesu name
“Jesus” comes from “Iesous”. “Iesous” comes from “Yeshu”, ‘Yeshu” comes from “Yeshua”. “Yeshua” comes from “Yehoshua”. Yehoshua is the paganized Masoretically pointed version of the ancient Hebrew “Ieushuo”.The Babylonians shortened the longest version of the name from “Yehoshua”, to “Yeshua”. Then the Orthodox Jews shortened the name “Yeshua” to “Yeshu”. Then the Greeks turned “Yeshu” into “Iesu” and “Iesous”. Finally in English “Iesous” was changed to “Jesus”.
01) IEUESHUO - English transliteration of the Ancient Hebrew Name
02) IEUSHUO - English transliteration of the shortened Ancient Hebrew Name
03) ISHUO - English transliteration of the further shortened Ancient Hebrew Name
04) YESHUA - English transcription of the second shortest Massoritic Jewish Hebrew Name
05) YESHU - English transcription of the shortest Massoritic Jewish Hebrew Name
06) IESU - English transliteration of the early Greek Name
07) IESoUs - English transliteration of the later Greek Name
08) IESUs - First English Name
09) JESUs - Second English Name
10) JEEZUs - Today’s English transcription (sound match) of the letters of the Second English Name
The name “Jesus” is an Anglicized variation of “Yeshu” which is a curse to blot out the name of the Messiah.
Jesus (English/Spanish) is Yeshu (Hebrew) is Yesu (Chinese) which is a curse to “blot out” His name
In China, the Messiah is called “Yesu” - NOT realizing it actually means “May His name be obliterated”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
