Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHICH MCCLINTOCK TO BELIEVE? TOM PROMISED HE WOULDN'T BE A SPOILER
KFI 640 | Matt Garrett

Posted on 10/01/2003 2:01:48 PM PDT by MattGarrett

On today's RECALL CENTRAL on KFI 640, they had the head of the "Lincoln Republicans" of Orange County. He stated that Tom McClintock had assured him that he would not stay in the race to play spoiler if it looked like he couldn't win. He promised that he would bow out before the election if his numbers didn't assure victory.

Other Cal GOP leaders were quoted as saying the same.

And yet, McClintock has vowed to stay in the race to the bitter end.

So, the question is ...

Which McClintock do we believe?



TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: arnold; california; davis; governor; mcclintock; recall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-306 next last
To: EternalVigilance
I know a goodly number of the McClintock supporters on FR--and they are generally the most thoughtful and civil of people.

They, like me, only become uncivil then treated uncivilly.

I honestly feel the same could be said of most Arnold supporters.

221 posted on 10/01/2003 4:28:29 PM PDT by jmc813 (How ironic is it that Arnold turned out to be the spoiler?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Then we could talk about his advisor on enviro issues, the enviro-whacko Robert Kennedy, Jr.

Making someone a top advisor is certainly an endorsement of that person and their views.

And it bodes very poorly for a Schwarzenegger administration.

222 posted on 10/01/2003 4:29:26 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Because as you DO know, Buffett isn't running for office.

Making leftists part of your team of advisors is WORSE than endorsing leftist candidates.

223 posted on 10/01/2003 4:30:59 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Arnold is already choosing Democrats for campaign advisers.

Your answer is stricken as nonresponsive. The question was whether Arnold had endorsed any Democratic political candidates, as Riordan had done. Underlying point being that Riordan was more lefty than is Schwarzenegger. Having a few Dems out of scores or hundreds of "advisers" isn't nearly as disconcerting as what Riordan did. (Put differently: can you imagine the field day you would have against A.S. if it were discovered that he'd endorsed some Democrat? I think you'd be a little more irked than you are because he has a couple of Dem "advisors," yes?)

224 posted on 10/01/2003 4:31:17 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy; ElkGroveDan

225 posted on 10/01/2003 4:31:52 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (RINOs ... the OTHER white meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Who's paying for the ads? Any Idea?

The Bruce Herschensohn ad is a part of the CRA thing isn't it.

Some ads maybe starting as a result of the Indian money coming into play.
226 posted on 10/01/2003 4:33:14 PM PDT by deport (Why does McClintock think he's entitled to the Governor's Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
God could make monkeys fly out of your butt too, if he so desired.

What's your point?
227 posted on 10/01/2003 4:33:15 PM PDT by The Coopster (Tha's no ordinary rabbit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Making leftists part of your team of advisors is WORSE than endorsing leftist candidates

No. Making a few Dems part of your team of scores of advisors is not worse -- or, to get back to my original point -- not more "lefty" than endorsing opposing party political candidates in contested general elections.

You're entitled to your view. I just cannot believe that you wouldn't be far MORE up-in-arms if you had learned that Arnold had endorsed or given $$$$ to prominent Democrats, esp. recently. Sorry, not buying.

228 posted on 10/01/2003 4:33:29 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: deport
Well 'tock won't have that charge...... unless you count the Indian couple of million.....

Quit playing dumb. McClintock didn't help finance the recall itself, and neither did the Indians.

Is that your best shot?

229 posted on 10/01/2003 4:34:35 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (LEADERS WANTED! No experience, principles nec., will train; Showbiz Stardom a PLUS! Call Calif. GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut; EternalVigilance; Roscoe; BlackElk
It started with "I'll hold my nose" and vote for Arnold and now its a total adoration for his very existance.
230 posted on 10/01/2003 4:35:16 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (You can't see where we're going when you don't look where we've been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
SHRIVER, MARK KENNEDY
VIA CITIZENS FOR MARK SHRIVER
11/04/2002 -1000.00
231 posted on 10/01/2003 4:35:46 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
SHRIVER, MARK KENNEDY
VIA CITIZENS FOR MARK SHRIVER
05/30/2001 1000.00 21990355033
05/30/2001 1000.00 21990355033
232 posted on 10/01/2003 4:36:20 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
He's a RAT, isn't he?

By the way, that was from the FEC.
233 posted on 10/01/2003 4:37:22 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Is that your best shot?


Tuesday is shoot day.
234 posted on 10/01/2003 4:37:29 PM PDT by deport (Why does McClintock think he's entitled to the Governor's Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
but Arnold is Giuliani.

A lot of people see that as a good thing. I can't for the life of me figure out why.

235 posted on 10/01/2003 4:39:01 PM PDT by jmc813 (How ironic is it that Arnold turned out to be the spoiler?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
If you don't vote for Arnold, they you are voting for Cruz.

Backwards. If you vote for Arnold, you are voting for the Cruz agenda.

236 posted on 10/01/2003 4:41:28 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Tellingly absent from your post is any defense this notion that having a minority faction of opposite-party advisors on board is somehow more treasonous to one's party than is ENDORSING opposing-party candidates. Wise.

He's a RAT, isn't he?

Is that a news flash? That Buffett is a Democrat? Wow, dude. Next you'll be telling me he's writing op-eds in the WSJ urging higher state property taxes. Thanks for the news!

By the way, that was from the FEC.

WHAT was from the FEC? Buffett's party registration status? See above.

237 posted on 10/01/2003 4:42:07 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
That must be why Tom is SO far ahead in the polls.....
238 posted on 10/01/2003 4:42:47 PM PDT by The Coopster (Tha's no ordinary rabbit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
So what's Tom's first act as governor... removing the Ten Commandants from all state property?

No....Tom never said anyhting like that. Biblical laws would be if you inserted the Ten Comandments into the California code.

239 posted on 10/01/2003 4:43:04 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
The FEC is the 'Federal Election Commision'.

Those are several donations by Arnold Schwarzenegger to a leftist Democrat.

Time for your mea culpa now....I'll wait patiently.
240 posted on 10/01/2003 4:44:08 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson