Democratic Surrender Monkeys, The Party of Islam, and 2004

Renew America ^ | 9/23/2003 | Jon Alvarez

[jonalvy44]

Democratic Surrender Monkeys, The Party of Islam, and 2004
by Jon Alvarez

We've witnessed the bowing of the Democratic Party to the anti-war radicals in this country, what many Americans aren't aware of is how the Democratic Party has become the Party of Islam. As we approach the election of 2004, Muslim organizations such as CAIR and the AMC have vowed to throw their support behind any Democratic candidate in order to defeat President Bush and his war on terror. Of course, Al-Quada and every other major terrorist organization are also rooting for a Democratic victory over President Bush. Do we see a disturbing pattern here? A vote for the Democrats in 2004 is a vote for Al Quada...

Click Link For Full Article...

[jonalvy44]

Democratic Surrender Monkeys is an appropriate moniker for the Dems, don't you think?

[VRWCmember]

Democratic Surrender Monkeys is an appropriate moniker for the Dems, don't you think?

No, I think it should be Democrat Monkey Traitors. They aren't surrendering to the islamofacists, they're collaborating with them.

[sheik yerbouty]

I didn't know the Demonrats were from France!

[jonalvy44]

making a comparison of their desire to negotiate a peace treaty with Al Quada to how the French would handle the situation...they run.

[Shermy]

Democratic Surrender Monkeys is an appropriate moniker for the Dems, don't you think?

I tried "neo-gaullist," but with little traction so far. :-(

Grampa Dave will think up a moniker than will grab the world, I bet.

[cwb]

Unfortunately, there's nothing new with this revelation. Carter used our enemies, the Soviets, to try and defeat Reagan; Clinton did the same with the Chinese, taking illegal campaign contributions in an attempt to defeat Dole. And now, the Democrats have allied themselves with some of the same Muslims who want to destroy us. Ann Coulter had it right: This is a treasonous party, that will undermine America's security in exchange for the throne.

[SwinneySwitch]

Some demonrats consider MONKEY a racist term!

[Arrowhead1952]

Go over to DU and post this article. That will start a big stink for all the whiners.

[dts32041]

No I have always prefered the traditional Copperheard.

[ken5050]

OTOH..there was a report on Fox yesterday, I think..said the final analysis of the 2000 returns showed that on average that Bush got 44% of the Jewish vote....he's gonna do a lot better in '04

[jonalvy44]

don't you have to register? I don't care to. You have my permission to use it. Just credit me.

[joesnuffy]

This just received from a good old friend...

BEHIND THE HEADLINES Latest contender for president
comes from long line of rabbis by Ron Kampeas

WASHINGTON, Sept. 17 (JTA) — Raised a Southern Baptist who later converted to Roman Catholicism, Gen. Wesley Clark knew just what
to say when he strode into a Brooklyn yeshiva in 1999, ostensibly to discuss his leadership of NATO´s victory in Yugoslavia. "I feel a
tremendous amount in common with you," the uniformed four-star general told the stunned roomful of students. "I am the oldest son, of
the oldest son, of the oldest son — at least five generations, and they were all rabbis." The incident could be a signal of how Clark, who
became the 10th contender in the Democratic run for the presidency on Wednesday, relates to the Jews and the issues dear to them.

Apparently Clark, 58, revels in his Jewish roots. He told The Jewish Week in New York, which first reported the yeshiva comment in
1999, that his ancestors were not just Jews, but members of the priestly caste of Kohens. Clark´s Jewish father, Benjamin Kanne, died
when he was 4, but he has kept in touch with his father´s family since his
20s, when he rediscovered his Jewish roots. He is close to a first cousin, Barry Kanne, who heads a pager company in Georgia.

Clark
shares more than sentimental memories with Jews. He couples liberal domestic views that appeal to much of the Jewish electorate with
a soldier´s sympathy for Israel´s struggle against terror. Appearing in June on "Meet the Press" on CBS, Clarke said he agreed with
President Bush´s assessment that Israel should show more restraint, a reference to the policy of targeting terrorist leaders for
assassination. "But the problem is," Clark continued, "when you have hard intelligence that you´re about to be struck, it´s the
responsibility of a government to take action against that intelligence and prevent the loss of lives. It´s what any society would expect
of its leadership. So there´s a limit to how much restraint can be shown." Speaking to the New Democrat Network this year, Clark said
that dismantling Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat´s Ramallah headquarters was "a legitimate military objective from their
perspective.

"For the Israelis, this is a struggle really for the existence of Israel," Clark said in remarks quoted on a support group´s
Web site. Clark is also tough on neighboring Arab states, expecting more from them in nudging the Palestinians toward peace. He has
said he would like to see Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia in a "contact group" similar to the alliance that Serb-friendly Russia joined to
force the Serbs to back down in Kosovo. He blames Saudi Arabia for allowing extremist strains of Islam to spread.

The former NATO
leader also opposes any active international role in policing the West Bank until the political situation is settled, a view that Israelis —
nervous at relinquishing control to foreign troops on their borders — would appreciate. Domestically, Clark favors many of the liberal
views popular with many Jews. He is pro-choice, and is strongly in favor of separating church from state. "In order to have freedom of
religion, you´ve got to protect the state from the church," he is quoted saying on his supporters´ Web site.

One of the leaders of the
Draft Clark campaign said Clark´s strength on foreign policy would neutralize an advantage President Bush now has with Jews, and
would bring the debate back to domestic issues, where the Bush administration is weaker with Jews. "It makes him credible and allows
him to focus on domestic policy," Brent Blackaby said in a telephone interview from Clark´s campaign headquarters in Little Rock, Ark.
Two of Clark´s top advisers are Jews who had prominent roles in the Clinton and Gore campaigns. Eli Segal was a top adviser to
President Clinton in his first term; Ron Klain helped run Vice President Al Gore´s
2000 campaign.


Enjoy your day

[marron]

The writer makes a good point concerning the "vietnamization" of Iraq, and it brings to mind something that has been nagging at me for a while.

Having seen what we have done, taking down the Taliban in a few days with a few men, when the whole world was telling us it would be our graveyard, and then cutting through the Iraqi Army like knife through butter, for the second time in a decade, certain things become obvious to me.

We turned victory in Somalia into defeat. The country went from chaos to relative peace overnight, because we occupied it with some 30,000 marines. Then we pulled them out and replaced them with UN peacekeepers and a handful of rangers, and we did it prematurely, when no Somali institutions yet existed. A dramatic win was thrown away and the debacle that resulted is well known. But it was not an act of nature, unavoidable, just one of those things. The Somali disaster did not have to be. It happened because our leadership was not serious about finishing the job they inherited and they were too quick to hand it off to the UN.

The Viet Nam war similarly did not have to be the disaster it was. It was an incompetent monkey show because it was politicized from the beginning, and no one in Washington ever really believed it could be won. But I believe it very plainly could have been won, had we set about to win it.

And in fact, we abandoned it at the moment of victory. We had essentially won, and we walked away, and rendered the sacrifice of all of those lives for nothing. We walked away because we lost sight of what we were trying to do. We were never beaten on the battlefield, we were never in any danger of being beaten. We just lost heart and walked away.

This is what the same cast of characters is trying to do to us now. If we listen to them, we take the most impressive victory the world has ever seen and we throw it away. We cease in that moment to be a serious nation. If we cannot stay this course, and finish the job which we have well begun, then God help us, we are incapable of helping ourselves.

[Bob J]

So that's what you look like!

[lainde]

Luv it!

[capydick]

"In order to have freedom of religion, you´ve got to protect the state from the church,"

Funny, I've always thought that there is a need to protect the church from the state, not the way he put it.

[Gritty]

Right on!

[jonalvy44]

LMAO

[cwb]

"We were never beaten on the battlefield, we were never in any danger of being beaten. We just lost heart and walked away."

You are correct..but before we lost heart and walked away, we were manipulated into thinking this way, just as we are now being manipulated to think the same. It was Horowitz who interviewed a N. Vietamese General who admitted they could never win on the battlefield and they relied on the dissenters to do the job for them. This is exactly what is happeneing today, as our enemies rely on our own useful idiots...including the liberal media, to wage this war for them.

It is our own citizens, including the media, who have enabled the enemies of this country to declare victories that they never would've been capable of winning without their help. This is not dissent...nor has it ever been. This is deliberate movement that is financed by hostile, outside sources, destined to destroy the will and character of this country. Weasley Clark may be content in calling this the "new" American Patriotism, but the truth is, this is nothing more than old-fashioned Marxism, designed to create discontent and division. They truly are the enemies within.

[Jacob Kell]

Want to bet that Clark's "Jewish roots" is a purely political posture? it seems that he may have had his eyes on politics for a while. If he's so proud of his Jewish roots, why don't he convert to Judaism? Did he say anything about Jessie Jackson calling NYC "Hymietown"?