President Bush Addresses the United Nations and Calls on World to Unite Against Terror, Sep 23, 2003

President Bush Addresses the United Nations and Calls on World to Unite Against Terror

United Nations General Assembly
New York, New York

Mr. Secretary General, Mr. President, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen: Twenty-four months ago -- and yesterday in the memory of America -- the center of New York City became a battlefield, and a graveyard, and the symbol of an unfinished war. Since that day, terrorists have struck in Bali, in Mombassa, in Casablanca, in Riyadh, in Jakarta, in Jerusalem -- measuring the advance of their cause in the chaos and innocent suffering they leave behind.

Last month, terrorists brought their war to the United Nations itself. The UN headquarters in Baghdad stood for order and compassion -- and for that reason, the terrorists decided it must be destroyed. Among the 22 people who were murdered was Sergio Vieira de Mello. Over the decades, this good and brave man from Brazil gave help to the afflicted in Bangladesh, Cyprus, Mozambique, Lebanon, Cambodia, Central Africa, Kosovo, and East Timor -- and was aiding the people of Iraq in their time of need. America joins you, his colleagues, in honoring the memory of Senhor Vieira de Mello, and the memory of all who died with him in the service of the United Nations.

By the victims they choose, and by the means they use, the terrorists have clarified the struggle we are in. Those who target relief workers for death have set themselves against all humanity. Those who incite murder and celebrate suicide reveal their contempt for life itself. They have no place in any religious faith, they have no claim on the world's sympathy, and they should have no friend in this chamber. Events during the past two years have set before us the clearest of divides: Between those who seek order, and those who spread chaos; between those who work for peaceful change, and those who adopt the methods of gangsters; between those who honor the rights of man, and those who deliberately take the lives of men, and women, and children, without mercy or shame.

Between these alternatives there is no neutral ground. All governments that support terror are complicit in a war against civilization. No government should ignore the threat of terror -- because to look the other way gives terrorists the chance to regroup, and recruit, and prepare. And all nations that fight terror, as if the lives of their own people depend on it, will earn the favorable judgment of history.

The former regimes of Afghanistan and Iraq knew these alternatives, and made their choices. The Taliban was a sponsor and servant of terrorism. When confronted, that regime chose defiance -- and that regime is no more. Afghanistan's president, who is here today, now represents a free people who are building a decent and just society -- a nation fully joined in the war against terror.

The regime of Saddam Hussein cultivated ties to terror while it built weapons of mass destruction. It used those weapons in acts of mass murder, and refused to account for them when confronted by the world. The Security Council was right to be alarmed. The Security Council was right to demand that Iraq destroy its illegal weapons and prove that it had done so -- The Security Council was right to vow serious consequences if Iraq refused to comply. And because there were consequences -- because a coalition of nations acted to defend the peace, and the credibility of the United Nations -- Iraq is free, and today we are joined by representatives of a liberated country.

Saddam Hussein's monuments have been removed -- and not only his statues. The true monuments of his rule and his character -- the torture chambers, and the rape rooms, and the prison cells for innocent children -- are closed. And as we discover the killing fields and mass graves of Iraq, the true scale of Saddam's cruelty is being revealed.

The Iraqi people are meeting hardships and challenges, like every nation that has set out on the path of democracy. Yet their future promises lives of dignity and freedom -- and that is a world away from the squalid, vicious tyranny they have known. Across Iraq, life is being improved by liberty. Across the Middle East, people are safer because an unstable aggressor has been removed from power. Across the world, nations are more secure because an ally of terror has fallen.

Our actions in Afghanistan and Iraq were supported by many governments, and America is grateful to each one. I also recognize that some of the sovereign nations of this assembly disagreed with our actions. Yet there was, and there remains, unity among us on the fundamental principles and objectives of the United Nations. We are dedicated to the defense of our collective security, and to the advance of human rights. These permanent commitments call us to great work in the world -- work we must do together. So let us move forward.

First, we must stand with the people of Afghanistan and Iraq as they build free and stable countries. The terrorists and their allies fear and fight this progress above all, because free people embrace hope over resentment, and choose peace over violence.

The United Nations has been a friend of the Afghan people --distributing food and medicine, helping refugees return home, advising on a new constitution, and helping to prepare the way for nationwide elections. NATO has taken over the UN-mandated security force in Kabul. American and coalition forces continue to track and defeat al-Qaida terrorists and remnants of the Taliban. Our efforts to rebuild that country go on. I have recently proposed to spend an additional 1.2 billion dollars for the Afghan reconstruction effort -- and I urge other nations to continue contributing to this important cause.

In the nation of Iraq, the United Nations is carrying out vital and effective work every day. By the end of 2004, more than 90 percent of Iraqi children under age five will have been immunized against preventable diseases such as polio, tuberculosis, and measles -- thanks to the hard work and high ideals of UNICEF. Iraq's food distribution system is operational, delivering nearly a half million tons of food per month -- thanks to the skill and expertise of the World Food Program.

Our international coalition in Iraq is meeting its responsibilities. We are conducting precision raids against terrorists and holdouts of the former regime. These killers are at war with the Iraqi people -- they have made Iraq the central front in the war on terror -- and they will be defeated. Our coalition has made sure that Iraq's former dictator will never again use weapons of mass destruction. We are now interviewing Iraqi citizens and analyzing records of the old regime, to reveal the full extent of its weapons programs and long campaign of deception. We are training Iraqi police, border guards, and a new army, so that the Iraqi people can assume full responsibility for their own security.

At the same time, our coalition is helping to improve the daily lives of the Iraqi people. The old regime built palaces while letting schools decay -- so we are rebuilding more than a thousand schools. The old regime starved hospitals of resources -- so we have helped to supply and reopen hospitals across Iraq. The old regime built up armies and weapons, while allowing the nation's infrastructure to crumble -- so we are rehabilitating power plants, water and sanitation facilities, bridges, and airports. I have proposed to Congress that the United States provide additional funding for our work in Iraq -- the greatest financial commitment of its kind since the Marshall Plan. Having helped to liberate Iraq, we will honor our pledges to Iraq -- and by helping the Iraqi people build a stable and peaceful country, we will make our own countries more secure.

The primary goal of our coalition in Iraq is self-government for the people of Iraq, reached by orderly and democratic means. This process must unfold according to the needs of Iraqis -- neither hurried nor delayed by the wishes of other parties. And the United Nations can contribute greatly to the cause of Iraqi self-government. America is working with friends and allies on a new Security Council resolution, which will expand the UN's role in Iraq. As in the aftermath of other conflicts, the United Nations should assist in developing a constitution, training civil servants, and conducting free and fair elections. Iraq now has a Governing Council -- the first truly representative institution in that country. Iraq's new leaders are showing the openness and tolerance that democracy requires -- and also the courage. Yet every young democracy needs the help of friends. Now the nation of Iraq needs and deserves our aid -- and all nations of good will should step forward and provide that support.

The success of a free Iraq will be watched and noted throughout the region. Millions will see that freedom, equality, and material progress are possible at the heart of the Middle East. Leaders in the region will face the clearest evidence that free institutions and open societies are the only path to long-term national success and dignity. And a transformed Middle East would benefit the entire world, by undermining the ideologies that export violence to other lands.

Iraq as a dictatorship had great power to destabilize the Middle East ... Iraq as a democracy will have great power to inspire the Middle East. The advance of democratic institutions in Iraq is setting an example that others, including the Palestinian people, would be wise to follow. The Palestinian cause is betrayed by leaders who cling to power by feeding old hatreds, and destroying the good work of others. The Palestinian people deserve their own state -- committed to reform, to fighting terror, and to building peace. All parties in the Middle East must meet their responsibilities, and carry out the commitments they made at Aqaba. Israel must work to create the conditions that will allow a peaceful Palestinian state to emerge. Arab nations must cut off funding and other support for terrorist organizations. America will work with every nation in the region that acts boldly for the sake of peace.

A second challenge we must confront together is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Outlaw regimes that possess nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons -- and the means to deliver them -- would be able to use blackmail and create chaos in entire regions. These weapons could be used by terrorists to bring sudden disaster and suffering on a scale we can scarcely imagine. The deadly combination of outlaw regimes, terror networks, and weapons of mass murder is a peril that cannot be ignored or wished away. If such a danger is allowed to fully materialize, all words, all protests, will come too late. Nations of the world must have the wisdom and the will to stop grave threats before they arrive.

One crucial step is to secure the most dangerous materials at their source. For more than a decade, the United States has worked with Russia and other states of the former Soviet Union to dismantle, destroy, or secure weapons and dangerous materials left over from another era. Last year in Canada, the G-8 nations agreed to provide up to 20 billion dollars -- half of it from the United States -- to fight this proliferation risk over the next ten years. Since then, six additional countries have joined the effort. More are needed, and I urge other nations to help us meet this danger.

We are also improving our capability to interdict lethal materials in transit. Through our Proliferation Security Initiative, eleven nations are preparing to search planes, ships, trains, and trucks carrying suspect cargo, and to seize weapons or missile shipments that raise proliferation concerns. These nations have agreed on a set of interdiction principles, consistent with current legal authorities. And we are working to expand the Proliferation Security Initiative to other countries. We are determined to keep the world's most destructive weapons away from all our shores, and out of the hands of our common enemies.

Because proliferators will use any route or channel that is open to them, we need the broadest possible cooperation to stop them. Today I ask the UN Security Council to adopt a new anti-proliferation resolution. This resolution should call on all members of the UN to criminalize the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; to enact strict export controls consistent with international standards; and to secure any and all sensitive materials within their own borders. The United States stands ready to help any nation draft these new laws, and to assist in their enforcement.

A third challenge we share is a challenge to our conscience. We must act decisively to meet the humanitarian crises of our time. The United States has begun to carry out the Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, aimed at preventing AIDS on a massive scale, and treating millions who have the disease already. We have pledged 15 billion dollars over five years to fight AIDS around the world. My country is acting to save lives from famine as well. We are providing more than 1.4 billion dollars in global emergency food aid, and I have asked the United States Congress for 200 million dollars for a new famine fund, so we can act quickly when the first signs of famine appear. Every nation on every continent should generously add their resources to the fight against disease and desperate hunger.

There is another humanitarian crisis, spreading and yet hidden from view. Each year, an estimated eight to nine hundred thousand human beings are bought, sold, or forced across the world's borders. Among them are hundreds of thousands of teenage girls, and others as young as five, who fall victim to the sex trade. This commerce in human life generates billions of dollars each year ? much of which is used to finance organized crime.

There is a special evil in the abuse and exploitation of the most innocent and vulnerable. The victims of the sex trade see little of life before they see the very worst of life -- an underworld of brutality and lonely fear. Those who create these victims, and profit from their suffering, must be severely punished. Those who patronize this industry debase themselves and deepen the misery of others. And governments that tolerate this trade are tolerating a form of slavery.

This problem has appeared in my own country, and we are working to stop it. The PROTECT Act, which I signed into law this year, makes it a crime for any person to enter the United States, or for any citizen to travel abroad, for the purpose of sex tourism involving children. The Department of Justice is actively investigating sex tour operators and patrons, who can face up to 30 years in prison. Under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, the United States is using sanctions against governments to discourage human trafficking.

The victims of this industry also need help from other members of the United Nations. And this begins with clear standards and the certainty of punishment under the laws of every country. Today, some nations make it a crime to sexually abuse children abroad. Such conduct should be a crime in all nations. Governments should inform travelers of the harm this industry does, and the severe punishments that will fall on its patrons. The American government is committing 50 million dollars to support the good work of organizations that are rescuing women and children from exploitation, and giving them shelter, medical treatment, and the hope of a new life. I urge other governments to do their part.

We must show new energy in fighting back an old evil. Nearly two centuries after the abolition of the Transatlantic slave trade ... and more than a century after slavery was officially ended in its last strongholds ... the trade in human beings for any purpose must not be allowed to thrive in our time.

All the challenges I have spoken of this morning require urgent attention and moral clarity. Helping Afghanistan and Iraq to succeed as free nations in a transformed region -- cutting off the avenues of proliferation -- abolishing modern forms of slavery -- these are the kinds of great tasks for which the United Nations was founded. In each case, careful discussion is needed -- and also decisive action. Our good intentions will be credited only if we achieve good outcomes. As an original signer of the UN Charter, the United States of America is committed to the United Nations. And we show that commitment by working to fulfill the UN's stated purposes, and give meaning to its ideals.

The founding documents of the United Nations and the founding documents of America stand in the same tradition. Both assert that human beings should never be reduced to objects of power or commerce, because their dignity is inherent. Both recognize a moral law that stands above men and nations -- which must be defended and enforced by men and nations. And both point the way to peace -- the peace that comes when all are free. We secure that peace with our courage, and we must show that courage together.

Thank you.

The take-charge U.S. President more than lived up to his billing Today, taking center stage boldly and forcefully, delivering a tour-de-force, audaciously no-holds-barred challenge, throwing down the gauntlet before the U.N. General Assembly with spunk and unwavering resolve.
Bush's iron will and determination, the tested mettle and strength-in-the-face-of-all-adversity which define his character, forms the starkest of contrasts to the often quarrelsome and petty U.N., its blustery anti-Americanism fueled by unbridled envy amid its unbridled irrelevance. Bush's clear-as-crystal vision, his commanding, eagle-eye view of the world, delivered in bold and daring prose, again contrasts glaringly with trifling, narrow-minded parochialism and drift at the U.N.
If murky, shilly-shally, wishy-washy is what you want, Bush's not your man. If wimpy, fickle, pussyfooting is your bag, you might want to check with Wesley Clark. George W. Bush, whose unabashed, matter-of-fact blunt talk slices diplo-drivel like a jackknife, cutting right to the chase, doesn't do Shilly-Shally. The frank, plain-spoken Texan, who drives girly-boy rivals absolutely bonkers, doesn't do Wishy-Washy either.
If Democrats and their media allies expected sheepish, self-abasement -- a craven 'Please, Pretty-Please-Forgive-Me-For-I-Have-Sinned-Against-You, Oh U.N. -- from Bush, a Texas-sized disappointment is what they got instead. The President -- unbowed, undaunted, unflinching -- made it clear he has nothing to apologize for. Rather than a mushy 'Admit-Guilt-And-Beg-Forgiveness' touchy-feely teary-eyed appeal, Bush gave the house of Kofi Annan a defiantly roaring call-to-action instead, a 'Put-Your-Money-Where-Your-Mouth-Is' challenge. Memo to the U.N.: Pony up, or stay irrelevant. Your call.
From the dais, Bush unveiled his plan-of-action, eschewing calls for quickie handover of U.S. authority in Iraq, as the French and Germans insist. If taking precipitous action is the price of U.N. assistance, that's a price the U.S. will not pay. The transfer of power will be done on U.S. -- not U.N. -- terms. There will be no handover of sovereignty to unelected councils; the return of authority will proceed in orderly fashion, on a U.S. -- not French nor German nor Syrian -- timetable. America, with its Coalition allies, has sacrificed blood and treasure in the sands of Iraq, now the world needs to quit yapping and meet its responsibilities.
"The primary goal of our coalition in Iraq is self-government for the people of Iraq, reached by orderly and democratic means," Bush told the U.N. "This process must unfold according to the needs of Iraqis -- neither hurried nor delayed by the wishes of other parties. And the United Nations can contribute greatly to the cause of Iraqi self-government."
The delegates got yet another rousing lesson on what true leadership really means. Bush, through words and action, exemplifies it. For Kofi Annan and the boys, Bush's more than just a thorn in their side; he's their worst nightmare. If el hombre de Tejas has taught the world body anything, it's this: He doesn't give squat what Syria or France or Libya think. Whether war or peace, whatever course America sets, with George W. Bush at the helm, it will serve American interests, or forget it. Those hoping the U.N. might act to "contain" the world's mightiest nation, its foreign policy hostage to endless draft resolution debates amid veto threats from Paris, Bush dealt those hopes a crushing blow last March. Under Bush, America will not be cowed, will not be pressured, will not be bullied. One year ago, in his opening address, Kofi Annan put the Arab-Israeli conflict at the top of the 'To-do' list. Bush, in his address, put Iraq and the spread of weapons of mass destruction at the top. One year later, Kofi Annan, in his opening address, puts Iraq and the spread of weapons of mass destruction at the top. Question: Which of these two men is driving debate, setting the agenda/priorities?
Bush, less than 3 years as President, through thickets and minefields, has led America to unparalleled greatness and power. Its ability to shape events and tip scales globally has never been greater. Bush has pushed back the bounds of possibilities beyond the unimagined. America is back. Gone are the days of America the pushover, the faltering, vacillating, wobbling weakling, the superpower of self-doubt.
America may not be loved the world over, granted, but no longer are we the object of scorn, of contempt. After Iraq and Afghanistan, enemies no longer mock America, they fear America. Again. Terrorists fondly remember the Clinton years. Small wonder. For them, those were the good times. Days of unparalleled growth. With Clinton at the helm, the terror business flourished, thousands of jobs were created.
Under Bush, it's been a deadly depression -- The Great Depression. For the terror underworld, Bush has brought nothing but death and joblessness. Two-thirds of al-Qaeda top management are maggot factories. The rest are dying or cowering in caves. End of story.
Granted, Iraq second-guessers abound these days. The Bush-haters crow that once skyhigh poll numbers are back down to earth. With the '04 campaign gearing up, one can hardly pick up a newspaper without FALLING POLLS! BUSH IS FINISHED! headlines blaring. The media pundits have Bush deep in embalming fluid and "president-elect" Dean forming his White House transition team.
Ah, yes, but haven't they forgotten a little itty-bitty something? A little something like...er, never -- ever -- Misunderestimate George W. Bush? Ann Richards will tell you why. Recall how Bush was written off for dead after New Hampshire? Hordes of pundits gleefully wrote Bush's obit. You could hardly pick up a newspaper without the UNSTOPPABLE MCCAIN JUGGERNAUT! BUSH IS FINISHED! headlines. In response, the fiesty Texan picked himself up, smiled, shrugged his shoulders and fought on with new resolve and vigor. No bitterness. No whining. No complaints. Just when the political morticians eagerly awaited W's corpse, he'd come roaring back to life -- confounding and frustrating his enemies.
Get set for an encore.

Sky is Falling! Sky is Falling! Part IV

Meanwhile, "Americans are split over whether the war was worth fighting; 50% say yes, 48% no," USA Today reported Monday, citing its latest poll. "That is a dramatic drop from April, when, as Saddam Hussein's statue was falling in Baghdad, 76% said the war was worth it."
Not only that, but in utterly horrific news for Vulnerable Bush, Democrat registration nationwide has, in one week, jumped a whopping 50 percent, from 33 percent total registration a week ago to 48 percent currently! We know this because, among the 1,003 adults interviewed in the CNN-Gallup survey, no less than 480 were "Democrats or Democratic leaners." That's 480 out of 1,003! If the shift in registration continues at this pace, all Americans will be Democrats in about a month. Terrible news for Bush, right?
Ah, not so fast.
After plunging Friday, Saturday and Sunday, the period covered in the CNN poll, support for the war has since rebounded, the sharp turnaround beginning in the early morning hours Monday, September 22. On Sunday evening, support for the war stood at 50%, as CNN-Gallup reports. But by early Monday morning, support for the war had soared to 63%, according to a new poll by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, released Tuesday. The Sunday-evening-to-Monday-morning turnaround in public sentiment seemingly caught most analysts, who predicted the meltdown would continue, by surprise. In the Pew poll, "despite the persistent attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq," 62 percent of Americans think the U.S. military effort there is either going very well or fairly well, only 35 percent disagree -- the same as in August.
What caused the turnaround -- this massive, overnight mood swing? Pew doesn't list a breakdown by party registration, but a my gut tells me the registration pendulum has swung back to Republicans ;-)
Kidding aside, the CNN-Gallup poll is a total and complete fraud. Democrat registration nationwide stands at 33 percent or so, not 48 percent, as CNN would have us believe. GOP registration hovers around 33 percent. The rest are mostly unaffiliated or independent.
The statistical anomaly in the CNN-Gallup poll means the results are "heavily skewed to the Democratic side," said Fox News' Fred Barnes Tuesday, citing James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal.
So much for Gallup polls.
Anyway, that's...
My two cents...
"JohnHuang2"

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.