Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warrior Queen Is Unearthed (1,500 Years Old - Anglo-Saxon)
Linconshire Echo ^ | 9-20-2003

Posted on 09/20/2003 4:51:38 PM PDT by blam

WARRIOR QUEEN IS UNEARTHED

10:30 - 20 September 2003

A 1,500-year-old Anglo-Saxon "warrior queen" has been found buried just two feet under the surface of a county field.

Lincolnshire's own 6ft tall "Boadicea" has been described as one of the best Anglo-Saxon finds of its kind in the county.

She was still holding her shield and had a dagger at her side when she was found. On either side of her at the site just outside Lincoln were the remains of a man and a woman who were possibly her attendants.

The woman was wearing an amber necklace and had her feet bound together with rope. The male companion was buried with his hand over a pot.

The exceptional discovery was originally made by a man with a metal detector.

Mystery surrounds the identity of the 6ft tall warrior queen.

Her ancient Briton predecessor Boadicea led a rebellion against the Romans in 61AD. After the Romans left England in 410AD tribal conflict was rife and the mystery queen might have fallen victim to this.

All the bones and artefacts discovered at the scene are now being examined by independent conservator Wessex Archaeology and at a later date will be brought back to the City and County Museum in Friars Lane.

Lincolnshire County Council archaeologist Adam Daubney said that there was an enormous sense of excitement when the bodies were unearthed.

"Any discovery from Anglo-Saxon times is important for Lincolnshire because this era of history is not as well documented as other periods," he said.

"In other parts of Lincolnshire we have found two large Saxon burial sites at Loveden Hill and Ruskington.

"But one of the interesting things about this is that a total of four shields have been found.

"The shield would have been originally made from wood but the boss - which held the handle in place - was made of iron and this has survived."

The Channel Four television programme Time Team carried out the excavation and the programme is due to be broadcast next spring.

The owner of the land on which the burial site was discovered asked not to be named to avoid the venue's location becoming common knowledge.

He said: "Two years ago a discovery of a brooch was made on the site which was unmistakably Anglo-Saxon. It was incredibly exciting to discover the burial site."

Councillor Marianne Overton, a member of Navenby Archaeology Group which assisted Time Team with the excavation, helped out at the three-day dig which took place between Tuesday and Thursday last week.

"What struck me was that there are possibly a great many more sites like this across the county," she said.

"When you actually see the venue and are able to imagine what life would have been like then you get a strong sense of the history of the county in which we live."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: anglosaxon; godsgravesglyphs; lincolnshire; middleages; queen; renaissance; unearthed; warrior
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: DaGman; Xenalyte
Ping
21 posted on 09/20/2003 5:30:24 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"The second woman had the amber beads around her neck and her feet were tied with a rope . . . and the man had his hand over a pot which had deliberately been made with holes in it so that it would never be used again."

Something tells me that the people who buried these folks were not a very nice bunch.

22 posted on 09/20/2003 5:34:08 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Bodacious find. G-9, from here.
23 posted on 09/20/2003 5:40:12 PM PDT by txhurl (When oh when will my arrowhead hunting addiction abandon ME!?!?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Darkchylde
A relative of yours?

So9

24 posted on 09/20/2003 5:46:16 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Minions, little girl?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
You know, there was an English queen who was over six feet and homely.. never married. I can't remember who it was. Anybody?
25 posted on 09/20/2003 5:51:03 PM PDT by Burn24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blam
Could you ping me to your neat finds? Thanks!
26 posted on 09/20/2003 5:55:27 PM PDT by annyokie (One good thing about being wrong is the joy it brings to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
Nah, too tall.
I'm probably related to a
race of short weird people...
27 posted on 09/20/2003 5:59:09 PM PDT by Darkchylde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam
"The bones of the female warrior suggested she was six feet tall."

Xena!!! We found ya!

28 posted on 09/20/2003 6:04:43 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
Wonderful read. Thank you Blam.

The theorizing is amusing.
The truth is likely more amazing.
29 posted on 09/20/2003 6:06:48 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie; Clara Lou; farmfriend
FReeper 'farmfriend' does the ping list for these posts. I've alerted her.
30 posted on 09/20/2003 6:11:58 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blam
 Pre-Christian Celtic warrior leader Boadicea killed many Roman Britons in revenge for their ravage
 of her people. Yet this statue commemorating her is a prominent feature in London today.
 

31 posted on 09/20/2003 6:15:32 PM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Cool. Put me on your ping list please.
32 posted on 09/20/2003 6:16:03 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Rofl...beat me too it.
33 posted on 09/20/2003 6:16:29 PM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"You know, if I were a single man, I might ask that mummy out," Clinton said. "That's a good-looking mummy."

He always reverts to type [male on the prowl], doesn't he?

34 posted on 09/20/2003 6:18:28 PM PDT by syriacus (Prankin' Al Franken....says he didn't lie to Ashcroft. His letter was only a prank. A Frankenprank?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
After watching a special on one of the cable channels on "The Search for the historical King Arthur", I bought two books at amazon.com: "In Search of the Dark Ages (of Britain)" by Michael Wood, a British historian. First chapter is "Boadicea." Wood also wrote "In Search of England" which devotes coverage to the Saxon era.

Second book was "The Holy Kingdom" by Adrian Gilbert in which he extensively covers the same time frame, incl. Boadicea. He postulates that King Arthur's home base was Wales, not Somerset, as is commonly assumed.

35 posted on 09/20/2003 6:20:25 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
But one thing seems certain. By virtue of the fact that she was buried with a shield and dagger it seems probable that she was a high ranking member of society. And she was almost certainly involved in conflict.

Maybe she was an early Joan of Arc.

36 posted on 09/20/2003 6:24:01 PM PDT by syriacus (Prankin' Al Franken....says he didn't lie to Ashcroft. His letter was only a prank. A Frankenprank?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Let's think about this.

She was the queen.

She was over 6 feet tall.

She had a sword and dagger and presumably did not carry them just to 'accessorize'. She knew what to do with them.

Now imagine it's 410AD. The queen is having a PMS kind of day.

RUN FOR DEAR LIFE!

37 posted on 09/20/2003 6:26:10 PM PDT by LibKill (Father Darwin has a sense of humor but no mercy whatsoever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Wow, interesting find. They never mention how tall the other two were. I wonder if six feet was very unusual, or if the Anglo Saxons were taller people.
38 posted on 09/20/2003 6:27:10 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Dammit!!! How'd you get that 'first thing in the morning' pic of me??? Did you somehow manage to install a secret cam in my medicine cabinet???

.

39 posted on 09/20/2003 6:33:52 PM PDT by GeekDejure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
The part about this that just doesn't make sense to me is that her feet were tied together, though she was buried with honor (i.e., with the shield and dagger). Wonder why it seems assumed that she was a queen? Could she have been a human sacrifice? Why would a ruler's subjects bury her with her feet tied together? If she was a queen (or at least a notable warrior), perhaps she was interred by enemies who respected her enough to bury her with the weapons and amber beads?
40 posted on 09/20/2003 6:38:59 PM PDT by solzhenitsyn ("Live Not By Lies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson