Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
AP ^ | August 13, 2003 | RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM

Posted on 08/13/2003 9:02:05 PM PDT by nwrep

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
2 hours, 55 minutes ago
Add Top Stories - AP to My Yahoo!

By RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM, Associated Press Writer

BOMBAY, India - U.S. and Indian scientists said Wednesday they have discovered a new carnivorous dinosaur species in India after finding bones in the western part of the country.

Photo
AP Photo


Missed Tech Tuesday?
Check out the powerful new PDA crop, plus the best buys for any budget


The new dinosaur species was named Rajasaurus narmadensis, or "Regal reptile from the Narmada," after the Narmada River region where the bones were found.

The dinosaurs were between 25-30 feet long, had a horn above their skulls, were relatively heavy and walked on two legs, scientists said. They preyed on long-necked herbivorous dinosaurs on the Indian subcontinent during the Cretaceous Period at the end of the dinosaur age, 65 million years ago.

"It's fabulous to be able to see this dinosaur which lived as the age of dinosaurs came to a close," said Paul Sereno, a paleontologist at the University of Chicago. "It was a significant predator that was related to species on continental Africa, Madagascar and South America."

Working with Indian scientists, Sereno and paleontologist Jeff Wilson of the University of Michigan reconstructed the dinosaur skull in a project funded partly by the National Geographic (news - web sites) Society.

A model of the assembled skull was presented Wednesday by the American scientists to their counterparts from Punjab University in northern India and the Geological Survey of India during a Bombay news conference.

Scientists said they hope the discovery will help explain the extinction of the dinosaurs and the shifting of the continents — how India separated from Africa, Madagascar, Australia and Antarctica and collided with Asia.

The dinosaur bones were discovered during the past 18 years by Indian scientists Suresh Srivastava of the Geological Survey of India and Ashok Sahni, a paleontologist at Punjab University.

When the bones were examined, "we realized we had a partial skeleton of an undiscovered species," Sereno said.

The scientists said they believe the Rajasaurus roamed the Southern Hemisphere land masses of present-day Madagascar, Africa and South America.

"People don't realize dinosaurs are the only large-bodied animal that lived, evolved and died at a time when all continents were united," Sereno said.

The cause of the dinosaurs' extinction is still debated by scientists. The Rajasaurus discovery may provide crucial clues, Sereno said.

India has seen quite a few paleontological discoveries recently.

In 1997, villagers discovered about 300 fossilized dinosaur eggs in Pisdura, 440 miles northeast of Bombay, that Indian scientists said were laid by four-legged, long-necked vegetarian creatures.

Indian scientists said the dinosaur embryos in the eggs may have suffocated during volcanic eruptions.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acanthostega; antarctica; australia; catastrophism; crevolist; dino; dinosaurs; godsgravesglyphs; ichthyostega; india; madagascar; narmadabasin; narmadensis; paleontology; rajasaurus; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 3,121-3,129 next last
To: f.Christian
same yipper, different skirt
261 posted on 08/15/2003 4:09:31 PM PDT by ALS (http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
It doesn't matter what the source of your information is, if it spouts evolution you'll defend it to the death. You will refuse to consider any debunking information.

You haven't posted any.

262 posted on 08/15/2003 4:38:12 PM PDT by balrog666 (Ignorance is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
If there were a designer, he would have had to have been drunk.

Placemarker for me, and a shot of Jim Beam all around!!
263 posted on 08/15/2003 5:04:54 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
If there were a designer, he would have had to have been drunk.

ROFL!

264 posted on 08/15/2003 5:05:43 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
gin mill science --- evoloonshine !
265 posted on 08/15/2003 5:11:42 PM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; Right Wing Professor
That's RWP's line, I just borrowed it, I thought that it was VERY good!! LOL

And will you check your freepmail PLEASE!! ;)
266 posted on 08/15/2003 5:18:04 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Mail back atcha :-)
267 posted on 08/15/2003 5:36:14 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
That freepmail thing is not for you by the way.

I am needing advice on a new telescope and thought that maybe Radioastronomer would be the one to ask. :)

Problem is, that if I am going to get it, I need an answer pretty soon, the thing has to come ground!! ARGH!!
268 posted on 08/15/2003 5:37:34 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000; Right Wing Professor; RadioAstronomer; Nakatu X; Alamo-Girl; ALS; gore3000; All
If there were a designer, he would have had to have been drunk.

You are in violation of your agreement.

5 Language Restraint We will not use obscene or belittling words to describe another complying poster or whatever that poster believes; however, merely factual or logical criticism and rebuttal shall never be considered "obscene or belittling."

You should know what to do, but I doubt that you will do it. This is another example of why I did not sign the agreement.

269 posted on 08/15/2003 5:42:02 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC; All
Absolutely. The name calling agreement is a license to abuse.

foretold here:

To: js1138

If not, I'm afraid the contract is toothless.

Not only toothless. It's counterproductive. All the "evildoers" will joyfully sign on and continue their merry ways, emboldened by a document that will be used to legitimize their behavior.


1,221 posted on 07/30/2003 9:43 AM CDT by Nebullis
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/952079/posts?page=1221#1221
270 posted on 08/15/2003 5:44:09 PM PDT by ALS (http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
You should know what to do, but I doubt that you will do it. This is another example of why I did not sign the agreement.

What? No jesting now? (even between us?)

Sheesh.

271 posted on 08/15/2003 5:49:34 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Sorry Andrew, there seems to be some noise interfering with your message.

If the noise would stop, I am sure that I would be able to respond in just the way you would like, but until the noise reduces itself, I can't make you out for some reson.
272 posted on 08/15/2003 5:50:57 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
If the noise would stop, I am sure that I would be able to respond in just the way you would like, but until the noise reduces itself, I can't make you out for some reson.

As I predicted, you would know what to do but would not do it.

273 posted on 08/15/2003 5:53:09 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
What? No jesting now? (even between us?)

Sorry, RA, but the tone has been set by others already. Dittojed2 has already been compared to medved to belittle, creationists have been described as not understanding the scientific method. I happen to have met and known Dr. John J. Grebe. He understood the scientific method. He was a creationist. All of those are counter to the agreement. Your participation was accidental and I do not consider you as culpable.

274 posted on 08/15/2003 6:01:16 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
I hope these threads do not degenerate into a "he said, she said" postings.
275 posted on 08/15/2003 6:18:49 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Fossils are dated by the layer of sediment they are in (based upon one man's conception of a Geological column)

One man's?!

276 posted on 08/15/2003 6:24:00 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Dittojed2 has already been compared to medved to belittle,

You are assuming motives not in evidence on this one.

...creationists have been described as not understanding the scientific method.

When they demonstrate that, they get called on it. Period. It's like a book review from someone who never read the book - it's a joke at best.

I happen to have met and known Dr. John J. Grebe. He understood the scientific method. He was a creationist.

Wonderful. Is he posting here? If not, who gives a d@mn. If you hope to establish that there are scientists who are Creationists, I think that's a given.

277 posted on 08/15/2003 6:38:11 PM PDT by balrog666 (Ignorance is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
God's Word speaks for itself

If that were true there wouldn't be so many sects. No, it's interpreted by people, sometimes with holiness in mind, sometimes with power on earth in mind.

278 posted on 08/15/2003 6:41:25 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
If you hope to establish that there are scientists who are Creationists, I think that's a given.

Good, that was my point. And I give a d@mn, buddy

279 posted on 08/15/2003 6:41:50 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
This is another example of why I did not sign the agreement.

I signed it and withdrew when I saw that many on the evolution side had dishonored their promises: Pheobe Debates post# 2692

280 posted on 08/15/2003 8:23:17 PM PDT by gore3000 (Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 3,121-3,129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson