Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RadioAstronomer
What? No jesting now? (even between us?)

Sorry, RA, but the tone has been set by others already. Dittojed2 has already been compared to medved to belittle, creationists have been described as not understanding the scientific method. I happen to have met and known Dr. John J. Grebe. He understood the scientific method. He was a creationist. All of those are counter to the agreement. Your participation was accidental and I do not consider you as culpable.

274 posted on 08/15/2003 6:01:16 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
I hope these threads do not degenerate into a "he said, she said" postings.
275 posted on 08/15/2003 6:18:49 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

To: AndrewC
Dittojed2 has already been compared to medved to belittle,

You are assuming motives not in evidence on this one.

...creationists have been described as not understanding the scientific method.

When they demonstrate that, they get called on it. Period. It's like a book review from someone who never read the book - it's a joke at best.

I happen to have met and known Dr. John J. Grebe. He understood the scientific method. He was a creationist.

Wonderful. Is he posting here? If not, who gives a d@mn. If you hope to establish that there are scientists who are Creationists, I think that's a given.

277 posted on 08/15/2003 6:38:11 PM PDT by balrog666 (Ignorance is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson