Skip to comments.
As gays advance, America squirms
The Detroit News ^
| August 10, 2003
| Ron French
Posted on 08/10/2003 8:50:57 PM PDT by new cruelty
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:09:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
FARMINGTON -- Jan Stevenson plans a summer wedding, a small affair with 30 or 40 friends and family. She hasn't picked a chapel or even a city. But she has picked a country.
She and partner Susan Horowitz will marry next summer in Canada. The gay couple's union will be a ceremony laced with private sentiment and public symbolism.
(Excerpt) Read more at detnews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: backlash; divorce; gay; homosexual; homosexualagenda; marriage; marriageamendment; prisoners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: new cruelty
ok, that's a nasty headline with which to impale us this late in the evening just before sleep.
2
posted on
08/10/2003 8:53:05 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
To: King Prout
...to impale us this late in the evening just before sleep LOL, sorry about the headline at this late hour. However, your comment was just as witty. : )
To: new cruelty
with Bush calling homosexuals "sinners." Lies. Bush said we are ALL sinners. Big difference which the article obviously strives to downplay. Perhaps the author feels that homosexuals don't commit any sins. Of any kind.
Prairie
4
posted on
08/10/2003 8:55:20 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(Middle East terrorists to the world: " We don't want no STINKING PEACE!!")
To: new cruelty
The YUCK factor will never go away, not in a thousand years.
The more these people push, the more there is an equal and opposite reaction.
The backlash ain't gonna be pretty.
5
posted on
08/10/2003 8:56:17 PM PDT
by
Palladin
(Proud to be a FReeper!)
To: new cruelty
ah...er...umm...
tit for tat?
*fleeing before this gets SOOOO much worse*
6
posted on
08/10/2003 8:56:24 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
To: new cruelty
The Episco's "leadership" have said the church no longer exists. Believe it. If yo can't believe men of the cloth, who can you beieve??? Hic
7
posted on
08/10/2003 8:58:45 PM PDT
by
Waco
To: new cruelty
The Triangle Foundation and similar organizations around the country are receiving more calls from gay people concerned about harassment since the Supreme Court ruling, Montgomery said, though no statistics have been compiled. Why is that?
I love the way this is phrased.
Imagine if it had been written like this:
The Triangle Foundation and similar organizations around the country are receiving more calls from gay people concerned about harassment since the Supreme Court ruling, Montgomery said, but they haven't compiled any statistics to back up their claim.
(steely)
To: Palladin
It seems though that the reaction is less and less with each passing generation. Maybe not. I'll have to give it more consideration.
To: new cruelty
"This is the line in the sand, the marriage issue," said Horowitz, 51, of Farmington. "We are their vision of hell." Only one among many.
10
posted on
08/10/2003 9:08:03 PM PDT
by
Terriergal
("multipass!")
To: Steely Tom
You're right. That phrase can be written with so many different slants:
...Montgomery said, though he could not provide statistics.
...Montgomery said, though he declined to provide statistics.
...Montgomery claimed, though he declined to provide statistics.
In the liberal press, Republicans "claim" and Democrats "say". Republicans "push" their agenda, while Democrats "fight" for theirs. Republicans "force", "refuse", and "deny", while Democrats "struggle", "protect" and "defend".
But the media's not biased.
11
posted on
08/10/2003 9:16:03 PM PDT
by
hayfried
To: new cruelty
Cere believes the debate isn't over homosexuality, but about the definition of marriage. That was a damned stupid thing to say.
To: Terriergal
She knows its a multipass!... fun movie.
To: new cruelty
yep. :-)
14
posted on
08/10/2003 9:19:30 PM PDT
by
Terriergal
("multipass!")
To: new cruelty
As gays advance, America squirms
--------------------
They aren't advancing any more than schizophrenics are advancing. With the help of the media and leftist judges they are wearing us down.
15
posted on
08/10/2003 9:19:35 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: Jeff Gordon
Tough day at work?
To: new cruelty
I'm bored with homosexuals. When I was younger and more naive, there was an initial fascination learning about something that was a taboo topic for so long, now it just reminds me of that stage children go through where they tell the same joke a hundred times and expect to get the same reaction as the first time.
I mean, who cares what people do? Why do they have to be so public about their "private lives"? Who do they think is interested? If they want a permanent life together, they should sign a contract. It's not like they care what the church has to say about their orientation. All they do is bitch about that, and get really nasty about demanding that mainline churches pat them on the head and tell them they're normal and won't go to hell or something, and that God wants them to be "fulfilled." What I can't believe is that any church would fall for that whiny approval-seeking petulant hostile behavior.
If they want conventional approval for an unconventional lifestyle, good frikken luck. I personally find descriptions of both male and female homosexuality icky. I hope that the next celebrity that decides to tell all thinks it over and gives it a pass.
17
posted on
08/10/2003 9:22:36 PM PDT
by
Judith Anne
(For the sake of His sorrowful Passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world...)
To: new cruelty
"In the bedroom, homosexuals now can do what they want without fear of being arrested".
BS- there never was a "fear" of being arrested. Yeah, like it was a police state 3 weeks ago. Liars.
To: Judith Anne
Well said.
To: new cruelty
Typical liberal reporting of manipulated 'facts'. Like this one:
"President Bush and the Vatican both spoke out against gay marriage, with Bush calling homosexuals "sinners." "
Bush did NOT call homosexuals sinners. He said, "we are ALL sinners." He did not single out homosexuals. Of course, an accurate quote would not make for an incendiary quote, though, would it?
I had to doublecheck to make sure Dowd didn't write this article with her usual extractions and manipulations. Poo poo to this balderdash.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson