Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The TRUE Capitol Hill Blue story the PRESS IGNORED:'Dems plan to undermine America to beat Bush'
FR - thru Capitol Hill Blue ^ | January 6, 2003 | DOUG THOMPSON

Posted on 07/11/2003 6:02:31 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl

Dems plan to undermine America to beat Bush
CapitolHillBlue ^ | January 6, 2003 | By DOUG THOMPSON

Posted on 01/28/2003 2:07 AM EST by JohnHuang2

Democrats plan to undermine public confidence in President George W. Bush by challenging his credibility and raising doubts about America, sources within the party tell Capitol Hill Blue.

A multi-pronged attack against Republicans and the President will focus not only on economic issues, but question American values, raise doubts about how this country is viewed by other nations and question the patriotism of Bush and his party.

The extensive campaign, developed by senior Democratic consultants and party leaders, was launched last week with attacks on the Bush economic plan by Democratic presidential hopeful Rep. Richard Gephardt.

In coming weeks, Democratic elected officials will question the President’s intentions on the pending war with Iraq. Writers and broadcasters friendly to the Democratic cause have already been provided talking points suggesting the war is about oil, not terrorism. “The talking points were developed before the end of last year and sent out to operatives and friendly media,” one Democratic consultant confided. “No Democratic member of Congress will question the President’s patriotism openly but we will use the media and other surrogates to raise doubts.”

Capitol Hill Blue obtained a copy of the talking points when the Democratic National Committee sent them to a news outlet recently acquired by CHB’s parent company. The talking points outline a strategy to raise public doubts of the President’s real intentions, including: --Saying the war is about oil and will be fought to benefit oil companies that have long supported Bush and the Republican party;

--Claiming the Bush administration has “manufactured” evidence against Saddam Hussein and used that evidence to encourage Britain and other allies to join the American fight against Iraq;

--Suggesting a wartime economy is the only way the administration can revive the country’s lagging economic situation.

“It is clear that the current approval ratings of the administration are tied directly to strong American feelings toward traditional values,” the talking points say. “To counter this, doubt must be raised as to America’s true position within the world community and the true intent of the Bush administration in waging war.”

Some Democrats admit privately they are uneasy with the party strategy to undermine American values in an attempt to get Bush.

“My boss doesn’t want anything to do with it,” one senior Senate aide told Capitol Hill Blue on Monday. “You don’t undermine this country to win elections.” Others, however, are willing to try anything to put the White House and Congress back under Democratic control. “The real war isn’t in Iraq,” one Democratic consultant said. “It’s right here at home, at the ballot box in 2004.”

Among the other points Democrats hope to make in the coming weeks:

--Both President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are controlled by oil and defense industry special interest groups.

--The war on terrorism is a failure because Osama bin Laden is still at large.

--America is unprepared for another terrorist attack because of White House preoccupation with Iraq. --War will increase the country’s economic woes. --Bush will be forced to raise taxes to finance the war.

“It’s time to take the battle to the people and make them understand just how dangerous George W. Bush’s policies are to the future of America,” the talking points conclude.

Democratic sources say the talking points were developed by Democratic Chairman Terry McAuliffe, former Clinton campaign strategist James Carville, Senate Majority Leader Daschle and former House Democratic Leader Gephardt.

“This is a classic, Jim Carville, scorched earth campaign,” crows one DNC staffer. “Take no prisoners. That’s how you win elections.” Democratic party spokesmen would not return phone calls seeking comment on this report.

© Copyright 2003 Capitol Hill Blue



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; 2004memo; bias; bushdoctrineunfold; dems; dougthompson; iraq; media; warlist; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-247 next last
To: PhiKapMom
My spelling has always been the same. I've never been able to spell "schidt". Even with spell check and a dictionary it's a lost cause. Brain moves faster/slower than fingers.

Please just accept me the way I am! I read fast! Am good a math......but don't ask me to spell.
161 posted on 07/11/2003 3:07:45 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Rope-a-dope, rope-a-dope, the rats want people to think Iraq hasn't done it before, because then people might assume they haven't given up on that anymore than the Baathists are sitting it out now. The rats are forgetting that the only things any intelligence agency would ever pass along to the UN is material which couldn't harm sources or reveal methods or Iraqi dissidents, which pretty much limits us to just using the weakest material. The last administration kept the UN too well informed, and the leaks undercut our guys and the inspectors severely in doing their jobs, not to mention risking people's lives unneccessarily. How can you tell the UN everything you know when the people undercutting the oil for food program are the French and they're sitting right there? Or how can anyone reveal real firm evidence in Niger, when French and German companies are part of Niger's mining?

The Dems are freaking , desperate, morons. Unfortunately for us, they have a lot of backing from antiAmerican types overseas. Their underhanded foreign contributions might grow this year because the French are no doubt miffed. On the otherhand, maybe they won't have much money to give without all that cheap oil they've been slipping out of Iraq, or all the weapons sales with Iraq...

A little history from another site:

FEBRUARY 8, 1981 : (NIGER SHIPS YELLOWCAKE TO IRAQ) Niger ships yellowcake to Iraq in two batches. Batch one, which consists of 432 drums and 137,435kg of yellowcake, is received. —Fourth Consolidated Report of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency under paragraph 16 of Security Council resolution 1051 (1996), S/1997/779, 8 October 1997, pp. 25-26, ; Fact Sheet: Iraq's Nuclear Weapon Programme, IAEA Action Team, .

1982 : (IRAQ GETS YELLOWCAKE FROM NIGER & PORTUGAL)Iraq obtains 426 drums containing 139,409kg of yellowcake from Niger and 487 drums containing 148,348kg yellowcake from Portugal. —Fact Sheet: Iraq's Nuclear Weapon Programme, IAEA Action Team, .

MARCH 18, 1982 : (IRAQ GETS YELLOWCAKE FROM NIGER) Iraq receives is second shipment of yellowcake from Niger. It consists of 426 drums containing 139,409kg yellowcake. —Fourth Consolidated Report of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency under paragraph 16 of Security Council resolution 1051 (1996), S/1997/779, 8 October 1997, pp. 25-26, .

(Hey, it worked once, why not try it again? With all of its front companies and agents, what maes anyone think Iraq was just looking to buy harmless French wine and tubing for Olympic grade bicycles? Does anyone seriously buy the story that international overisght, as the oft sourced Williams said, was good enough to be sure that Niger couldn't possibly have exported uranium to Iraq (or anywhere else Iraq requested?)

162 posted on 07/11/2003 3:23:50 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Bwahahahaha! Good grief, Gore still hasn't learned to use a gun, has he? (Recalling the pic of him in combat gear, circa Vietnam...)
163 posted on 07/11/2003 3:25:52 PM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

164 posted on 07/11/2003 3:30:13 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: piasa
"This may backfire big time on the rats; maybe the rats will try to keep the ads on only the fringe group sites and let them do the dirty work".

I have the same thought. My independent friends and the Dixiecrats in my family are in no mood for political games. They trust Bush and still have 9/11 in the back of their minds. I can see this backfiring.

Keeping fingers crossed...

165 posted on 07/11/2003 3:31:06 PM PDT by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SpookBrat
Did you see the Tenet announcement?

And now Tony's talking about CHB!
166 posted on 07/11/2003 3:33:32 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bookmarked. Thank you for this!
167 posted on 07/11/2003 3:44:19 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a monthly donor to Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
CHB ought to put a pic of the talking points on line.

I agree. Still, either the Dems and their press accomplices followed these talking points, or Doug Thompson has ESP - having written the article in January only to have the press-Dems. follow his script.

168 posted on 07/11/2003 3:56:27 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (We're in a global war on terrorism..If you want to call that a quagmire, do it. I don't.*Rummy* 6-30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Thanks, Phil. Will do.

You might be interested in this:

Stubborn Things [Reserve Officer in Iraq on the "Uranium" press meltdown]
L.T. SMASH - LIVE FROM THE SANDBOX ^ | 10 July 2003 | 'L.T. Smash'

169 posted on 07/11/2003 3:58:06 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (We're in a global war on terrorism..If you want to call that a quagmire, do it. I don't.*Rummy* 6-30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
I agree. But I think it would really be helpful to see the original. A picture is worth a thousand words :)
170 posted on 07/11/2003 3:59:05 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
You're very welcome. For a good time, check out the source at #169. Our troops rock! (^;
171 posted on 07/11/2003 3:59:29 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (We're in a global war on terrorism..If you want to call that a quagmire, do it. I don't.*Rummy* 6-30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: kcar
The Media extols her for returning civility to politics, something they thought Bush had wanted to do but evidently failed, and she is swept into history.

Yeah, swept into the dustbin of history you mean. That's about all.

Hellary will never be elected president. Her negatives are way to high.

172 posted on 07/11/2003 4:02:26 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl; All
Bumping 169 because they look INCREDIBLE to read.

AFTER y'all help me get off the Freepathon thread.

Ahem.
Hint.
Hint.
173 posted on 07/11/2003 4:04:47 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a monthly donor to Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: piasa
The Dems are freaking , desperate, morons.

Great post. Every news org EXCEPT Fox is not reporting that the BRITS are standing by their claim, despite the forged papers. They had other sources.

174 posted on 07/11/2003 4:04:50 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (Dues paying member of the vast right wing conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Excellent!
175 posted on 07/11/2003 4:05:45 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
What did he say?
176 posted on 07/11/2003 4:06:27 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; Doug Thompson
Let's try pinging Doug. He's supposed to be taking some time off. Maybe he'll post the original. It could make up for some of the attacks suffered by our CIC, the troops - us.
177 posted on 07/11/2003 4:07:41 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (We're in a global war on terrorism..If you want to call that a quagmire, do it. I don't.*Rummy* 6-30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I'm watching the SOB`s on ABC and CBS right now, continuing their efforts to discredit PresBush over his State of the Union Speech and the ongoing developements in Iraq..

We all need to stay confident and patient. This will blow over. The Democrats desire to distort the facts and mislead the American people is nothing but pure gutter politics. In the end, Democrats will pay a price for underestimating the President.

178 posted on 07/11/2003 4:10:58 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Thread about Tenet's statement here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/944595/posts

Tony Snow didn't read the whole statement, but distilled it into 3 main points:
1. The CIA approved the line.
2. Tenet is responsible for the CIA.
3. President Bush had no reason to think that the CIA would allow incorrect info to stand in the SOTU.
179 posted on 07/11/2003 4:14:26 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Thank you, Brad's Gramma! You've been raising money so fast, the bears forgot to beware of the bearknapper. (^;

Here's to
the existing fundraising time record.

180 posted on 07/11/2003 4:25:27 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (We're in a global war on terrorism..If you want to call that a quagmire, do it. I don't.*Rummy* 6-30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson