Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An INSANE situation up in Waltham, Massachusetts
Conservative Alerts.Com ^ | Chuck Muth

Posted on 06/16/2003 3:21:35 PM PDT by webber

An INSANE situation up in Waltham, Massachusetts

This one's so Outrageous, it makes our blood boil just to think of it. Take a look at his message:

ISSUE: Kim and George Bryant have been home-schooling their two kids, George (15) and Nyssa (13), much to the chagrin of the Waltham Public School (WPS) system. The Bryants thus far have refused to force their children to take a government-mandated standardized test to assess their education level.

The WPS empire struck back last year, obtaining a court order giving custody of the kids to the Department of Social Services (DSS), which ever since has been threatening to take the kids away from their parents.

As the MetroWest Daily News reported on Friday, "Both sides agree that the children are in no way abused mentally, physically, sexually or emotionally, but legal custody of the children was taken from Kim and George Bryant in December 2001." They were ruled to be "unfit" for not filing educational plans with the government.

Unfit. For not filing paperwork. With the government school system. Over the education of their OWN children.

In fact, George Bryant was actually ARRESTED six years ago for failing to comply with the government's dictates over the home-schooled education of HIS children.

Arrested!!...Thrown in jail!!...Like a criminal!!...For taking personal responsibility for the education of HIS kids.

This six-year legal battle exploded on Thursday as bureaucrats from the DSS showed up at the Bryants' home with police escorts at 7:45 a.m. and attempted to remove the children from their home and force them to take the mandated tests.

Once again, the Bryants told the government agents to pound dirt, resulting in a seven-hour standoff.

"This has been a six-year battle between the Waltham Public Schools and our family over who is in control of the education of our children," said Bryant.

How DARE these parents stand up to the government and defend their right to raise their children as they see fit? Who do they think they are?

At least, that's the attitude of one outrageous government bureaucrat involved in this brouhaha. "We have the legal custody of the children and we will do with them as we see fit," DSS trooper Susan Etscovitz told the Bryants Thursday morning. "They are minors and they do what we tell them to do."

It is near impossible to describe the rage I feel inside every time I read those chilling words. WE will do with them as WE see fit. They do what WE tell them to do.

The sheer audacity of a bureaucrat to make such a statement about someone else's children who are in no way abused in any shape, form or fashion is beyond comprehension to me.

Comrade Etscovitz maintained on Thursday that, "No one wants these children to be put in foster homes. The best course of action would be for (the Bryants) to instruct the children to take the test."

One can just imagine her words being delivered with a thick East German accent: "undt now, all vee need eez dee kidz!"

This isn't about education. It's about control. It's about an imperial government trying to crush a movement in its infancy which could one day spell the end of the public school monopoly over our kids' educations.

Home-schooling means children might start learning again. REAL learning. Not "whole language" and "self-esteem." Learning about radical notions such as freedom, liberty and personal responsibility. Notions such as limited government and the Constitution and the vision of our Founding Fathers.

Yeah, we can't have THAT!

ACTION ITEM: As it appears that DSS is getting its marching orders from the Waltham Public Schools, it seems the best place to start is with the School Superintendent there. Her name is Dr. Susan Parrella. She can be reached via email at:

parrellas@k12.waltham.ma.us
or by phone at:
(781) 314-5400
or fax at:
(781) 314-5411.

Emails are great... but nothing quite ruins a bureaucrat's day like dealing with a flood of phone calls. I know. I just called. The woman who answered the phone hung up on me when she found out what I was calling about. They do NOT want to answer any questions about this.

Oh, and by the way. I reached Ms. Etscovitz this morning. She was not a happy camper once she found out what I was calling about. Refused to comment on her "we will do with them as we see fit" statement, saying only, "I'm terminating this conversation now," before slamming the phone down.

I think it would really bug her if a lot of people called (781) 641-8500, so please, please don't rattle her cage, OK? That number not to call again to reach Susan Etscovitz is (781) 641-8500. That's (781) 641-8500. (You could also fax her at 781-648-6909.)

-- Chuck Muth, ConservativeAlerts.Com


We normally set up a website with a pre-written letter to Congress, etc. However, we thought it would be much more effective for our members to make contact as described above, in their own words. If you get a response you'd like to share, be sure to drop us a note. As this issue develops and is "bumped up the ladder" of responsibility, we'll let you know who to contact next.

NOTE: The situation in Waltham has gotten WAY out of hand.

Outraged Americans across the country need to contact these bureaucrats NOW to express their outrage and demand they do the RIGHT thing. Be sure to forward this email to everyone you know who wants to help save parental choice in America, starting in Massachusetts. p> Thank you!

--Chuck Muth, ConservativeAlerts.Com




TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 18uscs242; homeschoollist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-316 next last
To: webber
government schools...standards set by the government....state schools....who pays for the schools....who pays for the government...a good society.....ad nauseum.

Home schooling is the least of the problems here, folks.
101 posted on 06/16/2003 10:36:50 PM PDT by wrbones (Bones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
I don't know that about the Amish, (private school, yes, but NO testing? how could that be true?) I know about ultra-orthodox groups in Brooklyn, they must have standardized testing done, even under the auspices of the private school administrators.
Anyway, you reminded me of the time our older son had to take the NY State regents and even though we believe in creation (and not evolution), it was covered in one of the tests he had to take. It was so funny listening to him memorize the dates and time frames on the model tests, and believe me, we had no worries that he would believe these 'dates', it was just a test he had to answer 'correctly.'
Although, he was 17, and obviously we wouldn't have sent him at a young and impressionable age to a school that taught these ideas as a belief system.
102 posted on 06/16/2003 10:41:21 PM PDT by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sarah; katiebelle; Courier; secretagent; dark_lord; jerrymdss; kimoajax
Wow, it was it refreshing to find I am not totally alone in my views on this article. This was posted on another thread (not the one linked in post #3), but since I have not yet mastered doing links, I will simply say that I was being flamed as the only one who considered that state testing of homeschoolers was reasonable.

On that thread, I stated my admiration for homeschoolers for the immense sacrifices they have made (my sister homeschools, so I know that it requires a tremendous amount of effort).

Most current homeschoolers are very devoted to their commitments, and their children excell far beyond our contemptible public education.

But if this family is allowed to thumb their nose to state testing, then I see this as setting a precedent for all the lazy, low-life project mentality parents to "claim" that they are homeschooling their children. And they would no longer have to prove it. Then, as one of you stated, these children will grow up and be turned loose on society.

I just wish I knew how to do a link so that you guys could peruse the other thread and help me out. But alas, I've just now learned how to cut and paste, but the instructions I've been given on doing links still baffle me.)

103 posted on 06/16/2003 10:45:12 PM PDT by bjcintennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sarah
So Sarah Let me ask you a history question.

Who was the last man on the Moon ?
A. Alan Shepard
B. Eugene Cernan
C. Neil Armstrong
D. Harrison Schmitt
104 posted on 06/16/2003 11:58:03 PM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TxBec
ping.
105 posted on 06/17/2003 2:57:42 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah
It's sad that individual freedom has been replaced by the "good of the society/commune" idea. I was told to my face, in so many words, from a "renowned" doctor who teaches immunology, that their goal is to wipe out disease on the globe (without giving proof that their method actually works or is the true cause of disease eradication which could be attrubuted to clean water, etc), and it's fine if we have to sacrifice some children through vaccine-induced injury or death. That's sick.

What if this so-called "herd immunity" described does indeed work by not allowing a disease to get a hold? It could only do so by sacrificing some of the most weak and vulnerable to adverse vaccine reactions, including death --is that acceptable (maybe in today's Amerika)? With our modern medicine and bioterrism sensitivities, it is highly unlikely that a disease would spread far in the manner you described.

I've seen doctors make SO many mistakes...and they totally avoid preventative/nutritional aspects of medicine. What about the parent who "knows" that their child seems to have food sensitivitious (through family history, close observation), but can't perform medical tests to prove it? Must they still submit their child to vaccinations about which the doctors don't even know the contents? Ever try to get a hold of the vaccine insert to read? Good luck; you must be provided one by law when you buy aspirin, but you are treated like a space alien if you ask for one for DPT or MMR. A child I know has wheat sensitivities, and not a single doctor in the entire prestigus could tell the parent whether the shots had wheat/gluten- huh? Who's being irresponsible there -- the ignorant doctor or the parent who seeks further info?

I don't know all the facts in this case, so it's hard for me to say what's going on -- were there simple steps the parents could have taken earlier which would not have infringed on their consciences but meet the letter of the law? That being said, I think it is better to run the risk of a few children being "left behind" by fake/irresponsible homeschooling parents than to regulate the vast majority who are doing it right, in order to leave sacred the right of parents to direct their children's upbringing (it may be too late in terms of precedent, since we've swallowed the hokum of mandatory schooling). There are already laws against child abuse, those should suffice to get the really bad eggs. By the way, many of the most successful small businesspeople I know only have high school educations; and we need more people in the trades (electrical, plumbing, etc), not more brainwashed collegians.

106 posted on 06/17/2003 4:40:13 AM PDT by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: webber
I would think that Massachusetts is running afoul of the federal "adoption and safe families act," which tries to encourage reunification.

As a general rule, unless a court is shown "imminent risk" to a child's health or welfare, a child should not be removed from the home.
107 posted on 06/17/2003 5:02:45 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah
A village of completely self absorbed people trying to prove some idiotic point, ignoring all the good they receive from others, to ruin a society, yes.Just one question regarding your stance on this issue, and I ask it with all due respect.

Are you a socialist?

108 posted on 06/17/2003 5:22:51 AM PDT by FierceDraka ("I am not a number - I am a FREE MAN!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #109 Removed by Moderator

To: webber
So you're saying I should't call Susan Etscovitz at (781) 641-8500, but if I did call Susan Etscovitz at (781) 641-8500 I should not use foul language. OK. I will give some thought to calling Susan Etscovitz at (781) 641-8500.
110 posted on 06/17/2003 5:33:11 AM PDT by theDentist (So. This is Virginia.... where are all the virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah
...ignoring all the good they receive from others, to ruin a society, yes.

Just what in the hell do I owe society? I have a few boxes of copper clad hollow points if you'd like payment in precious metals.

111 posted on 06/17/2003 5:44:05 AM PDT by TigersEye (Joe McCarthy was right...so was PT Barnum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jerrymdss; dark_lord; Sarah
I agree with the other gentleman, its like taking a test for a driver's license --

Oh yeah, that works real well. No one with a state issued drivers lisence ever drives drunk or gets into a high speed chase to avoid a DUI etc. If one is a competent driver and thus never causes an accident or breaks the traffic laws why should they prove their ability to the state? Haven't they already demonstrated it?

Lisence and create a data base on people who screw up. Driving should be a right until you mess up just like owning a firearm. The right is limited or completely curtailed in proportion to how much you abuse it. Abuse either one too much and you lose your right to walk free. As it is lisenced drivers are working on their fourth, fifth, sixth DUI's.

I don't get the logic at play here. You're afraid that homeschooled kids will end up 'pig stupid' unless the state tests them. What is the graduation rate of public schooled kids? What are the consequences to the state for kids who fail? Oh yeah, higher budgets. What is it the state is teaching that's producing this abundance of societal paragons?

When the state demands testing of homeschoolers they should enroll in public school and then drop out. What does the state ever do about drop outs?

112 posted on 06/17/2003 6:17:02 AM PDT by TigersEye (Joe McCarthy was right...so was PT Barnum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: webber
I think it would really bug her if a lot of people called (781) 641-8500, so please, please don't rattle her cage, OK? That number not to call again to reach Susan Etscovitz is (781) 641-8500. That's (781) 641-8500. (You could also fax her at 781-648-6909.)
I've been saying for awhile that the best way to deal with overofficious government agents (and the CPS types are among the worst) is to post their names, pictures, addresses, home phone numbers...stuff like that.

-Eric

113 posted on 06/17/2003 6:19:48 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah
"A village of completely self absorbed people trying to prove some idiotic point, ignoring all the good they receive from others, to ruin a society, yes."

Spoken like a true socialist. How, pray, can home-schooling ruin society? Oh, I forgot, you are a socialist and you are speaking of a socialist society. Yes, freedom can ruin such a society.
114 posted on 06/17/2003 6:21:00 AM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CaptainJustice
"Well, you havent proven that you have a minimum amount of knowledge to attend here, but your parents assure me you're smart enough, so have fun!"

Don't all colleges and universities give their own entrance exams? Don't all government schooled kids have to take them? Why should homeschooled kids take a state test then?

115 posted on 06/17/2003 6:24:46 AM PDT by TigersEye (Joe McCarthy was right...so was PT Barnum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sarah
About that government that "provides safety and decent neighbors, and police and fire departments... "

"We have the legal custody of the children and we will do with them as we see fit," DSS trooper Susan Etscovitz told the Bryants Thursday morning. "They are minors and they do what we tell them to do."

Ah yes, the gentle yet tough love of a government bureacrat. The village has called, and they want their child.

116 posted on 06/17/2003 6:28:36 AM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Courier
"All the government wants is to know they are really being educated."

If the govrenment was so interested in a child's education it would completely re-vamp the public school system, which is a disgrace.
117 posted on 06/17/2003 6:30:53 AM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Travelgirl
"Maybe the parents should make a deal with the school...you can test our kids if we can test your teachers."

Excellent proposal.
118 posted on 06/17/2003 6:41:53 AM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Sarah
"The family had YEARS to see this coming..."

G*d D*mn right! They should have been well-armed!

You tell 'em, sister!

BLOAT!!!!

;^)
119 posted on 06/17/2003 6:43:51 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Courier
How do you know the parents aren't a couple of psychopaths?

Public school to the rescue!!!

Bwahahaha! The school counselor will give the kid a donut and a prozac-ritalin cocktail and all will be well.

I want the State to make sure. Someday these kids are going to be released on all of us. Hopefully well educated and well adjusted, but we need a clue they are going in that direction.

Someday all public schooled kids will be released on us. I want them all locked up, sterilized or shot judging from current results. Seig heil (Hail welfare), comrade!

120 posted on 06/17/2003 6:46:11 AM PDT by TigersEye (Joe McCarthy was right...so was PT Barnum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson