Skip to comments.
DRUDGE SIRENS: CIA REPORT WARNS AL QAEDA SET TO USE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, OBTAIN NUKES
The WashingtonTimes ^
| 6/3/03
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 06/02/2003 9:52:11 PM PDT by Pro-Bush
WASH TIMES: Islamist extremists linked to al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden have a wide variety of potential agents and delivery means to choose from for chemical, biological and radiological or nuclear (CBRN) attacks, said the four-page report titled Terrorist CBRN: Materials and Effects...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; breakinghard; herewegoagain; nothingfollows; nukes; obl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-275 next last
To: _Jim
... and the *whole* point of the last two *successful* 'wars' has been to head this sort of thing off - RIGHT???
Right....Has there been another terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11/01?
No there hasn't.
Did I miss your point or something?
41
posted on
06/02/2003 10:22:35 PM PDT
by
Pro-Bush
To: AGreatPer
If they didn't lock the borders down, for any significant period of time, on 9/11, then why would they do so, today? The borders will never be shut, in my opinion.
42
posted on
06/02/2003 10:22:58 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Lurking since 2000.)
To: yonif
It's a stupid idea and I know it. It didn't go over my head. Give a fellow freeper some credit.
Actually I was going to say give them Vermont so they can have all the married gay couples to deal with.
43
posted on
06/02/2003 10:23:09 PM PDT
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(Soccer Mom's flee the Rats for Bush in his flight suit: I call this the Moisture Factor. MF high!)
Comment #44 Removed by Moderator
To: yonif
Thanks yonif. I thought so. You forgot the sarcasm off tag.
45
posted on
06/02/2003 10:24:19 PM PDT
by
Pro-Bush
To: Mo1
They couldn't have gotten them from Saddam, because he didn't have any WMD, right? Isn't that what the anti-war crowd has been telling us?
To: Grampa Dave
LOLOLOL!
47
posted on
06/02/2003 10:25:20 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Pray for America and Israel)
To: Pro-Bush
Did I miss your point or something?Not at all.
I just wanted to be *crystal clear* on that point.
48
posted on
06/02/2003 10:25:40 PM PDT
by
_Jim
(http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
To: FairOpinion
I have always suspected that the reason why the gov't hasn't shown all of the evidence about the WMD, is because Iraq is teeming with terrorists, who either got to the weapons already, or are still hunting them down. Just my opinion.
49
posted on
06/02/2003 10:26:38 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Lurking since 2000.)
To: _Jim
Whew!
50
posted on
06/02/2003 10:26:57 PM PDT
by
Pro-Bush
To: yonif
"Let's give them a state"
---
You,of all people shouldn't have brought this up, because that is exactly what they want, not a state, but a country: Israel. And you what they want to do with it.
To: bonesmccoy
My algebra one teacher was a terrorist.
Looking back on it, she didn't boy students who were boys.
52
posted on
06/02/2003 10:27:18 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Can anyone ever remember the NY Slimes printing a truthful story? I can't!)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
"For the states to effectively monitor the situation, heighten security, they need funds."
The states have funds, so deploying funds is a matter of priorities, political judgements.
What many in local governments are doing these days is basically claiming they cannot do "Homeland Security" activities, unless given MORE funds.
Regardless of where funds come from, such security SHOULD be raised to a high priority. Maybe for starters, states and local governments can cut out non-essentials.
Recently the Los Angeles Mayor asked the Council for 350 more cops, but was turned down. The largely socialist Council wants to keep spending on non-essentials, but won't spend for ESSENTIAL security activities.
To his credit, the Mayor pledged to keep pushing, whatever that means.
To: ganeshpuri89
Just something to consider.So, who is next in the series after Iraq?
54
posted on
06/02/2003 10:27:34 PM PDT
by
_Jim
(http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
To: sinkspur
I'm kinda in favor of not believing them either - the act of terror can sometimes be just to make us think they are going to attack - when in actuality, they are not capable of pulling off such an attack. But the thought can be the worst terror of all - waiting for the attack.
55
posted on
06/02/2003 10:28:01 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
" gov't hasn't shown all of the evidence about the WMD, is because Iraq is teeming with terrorists, who either got to the weapons already, or are still hunting them down. "
---
I think you are right. It is more important to try to find them, than to worry about the screechings of the leftists.
To: _Jim
"So, who is next in the series after Iraq? "
It's a toss up between Iran and Syria. Iran first, then Syria, or the other way around, but I think they will both have a "regime change" before we are through.
Comment #58 Removed by Moderator
To: yonif
LOL....now now.......:o)
Stay Safe Yonif !
59
posted on
06/02/2003 10:33:53 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: AGreatPer
370,000 illegals have come in since 9/11. Is that all? Even one could be too many. I want to know why we can't repatriate the illegals we already have.
60
posted on
06/02/2003 10:34:32 PM PDT
by
risk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-275 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson