Skip to comments.
Move underway to impeach Bush (Mega Barf Alert)
WorldnetDaily ^
| March 13, 2003
| Sherrie Gossett
Posted on 03/13/2003 2:51:20 PM PST by prophetic
Move underway to impeach Bush Conyers, anti-war activists charge 'high crimes and misdemeanors'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: March 13, 2003 5:00 p.m. Eastern
By Sherrie Gossett © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
Formal efforts are now underway to impeach President Bush over allegations that a pre-emptive strike against Iraq constitutes "high crimes and misdemeanors," Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill, reported today.
A meeting Tuesday reportedly assembled more than two dozen prominent liberal attorneys and legal scholars who mulled over articles of impeachment drafted against President Bush by activists. The two-hour session was said to feature former attorney general-turned-activist Ramsey Clark and took place in the downtown office of a prominent Washington tort lawyer.
Participants said Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., who hosted the meeting, was the only member of Congress to attend.
"We had a pretty frank discussion about putting in a bill of impeachment against President Bush," said Francis Boyle, an Illinois law professor who has been working on the impeachment language with Clark
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911; bush; conyershit; democrat; impeach; iraq; nutcasedemocrats; politics; traitor; treason; waronterrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Grampa Dave
Clark is a serious batcave conspiracy theorist, alleging for example that US troops massacred upward of 40,000 civilians in Panama in 1989. Evidence: None. According to Clarke (a highly trained lawyer) "everybody knows it" so no evidence is necessary. He does not get the tinfoil hat label from the media, however, since (as in so many things) the hard-left is exempt from the usual standards.
Clarke was attorney-general at the time of the MLK and Robert Kennedy assassinations in 1968. He was J. Edgar Hoover's boss and presided over an extensive program of spying and harrassment against the same anti-war dissidents whom he later joined with such mindless, utterly berserk enthusiasm. Oddly, MLK and RFK assassination conspiracy theories never mention him as a suspect. He is practically the only holder of high office from the time who hasn't been accused. Do the tin-foil hatters protect their own? A conspiracy of silence among conspira-loons? Inquiring minds want to know.
To: atomic conspiracy
Thanks for the feedback on Clark.
I firmly believe that we have been infected and endangered by what I call the 3 C's, (CLARK, CARTER and CLINTON).
The 3 C's since the late 1960's to the present have done incredible damage to America. They have been allies of the communists and Islamofacists who want to destroy America.
22
posted on
03/13/2003 3:27:37 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: prophetic
Formal efforts are now underway to impeach President Bush over allegations that a pre-emptive strike against Iraq constitutes "high crimes and misdemeanors," I wonder what they want to do to the Congress which overwhelmingly approved giving Bush the power to do so?
The Bush haters are so stupid it's almost funny.
23
posted on
03/13/2003 3:36:01 PM PST
by
Jorge
To: virgil
My understanding is that you cannot impeach a President over matters of policy. Actually, Congress can impeach and remove a president for spitting on the sidewalk, if they want to. Impeachment is a legislative action, not a legal action.
24
posted on
03/13/2003 3:42:51 PM PST
by
jimtorr
To: prophetic
In November of 2002, WND reported that former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark had been retained by Iraq to represent that regime's legal interests. This little tidbit from the article never gets enough play.
25
posted on
03/13/2003 3:45:52 PM PST
by
jimtorr
To: Nick Danger
I'm for this - only if the public is positively confident this action is PAYBACK and nothing more.
If so - then the dems stand to lose BIG TIME!!!
26
posted on
03/13/2003 3:47:43 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
( -> -> -> Oswego!!)
To: prophetic
The two-hour session was said to feature former attorney general-turned-activist Ramsey ClarkDarn. If only Bush ran a communist dictatorship, or had slaughtered a few thousand Muslims in the Balkans, he could get on Clark's good side.
27
posted on
03/13/2003 4:00:01 PM PST
by
Stultis
To: prophetic
I'd like to READ these articles of impeachment and see what their 'high crimes and misdemeaner' charges are....this is nothing but an anti-war publicity ploy. They figure the VRWC used it to make the world despise BUBBA, so it should work for THEM, right?!?!
I bet stealing the 2,000 election is right at the top of the list.
ROFLOL!!
28
posted on
03/13/2003 4:02:37 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
To: Nick Danger
"This is great news. I think every Democrat in Congress should get very vocal on this issue. They need to make sure that the public understands that the Democratic Party stands foursquare behind this proposal"Exactly. I am DYING to see what all those scions of virtue in DLC have to say about this.
29
posted on
03/13/2003 4:05:37 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
To: prophetic
Does this mean these pukes have finally accepted the fact that W was elected? After all, you can't very well impeach a president who wasn't elected, can you?
I'm glad they finally see the light which must be very difficult considering where their heads are.
To: prophetic
I know Conyers could be censured, but what about recalled?
31
posted on
03/13/2003 4:10:16 PM PST
by
Liberatio
(Please forgive my misspelling)
To: prophetic
Ramsey Clark....I hd a feeling there'd be a TRIAL LAWYER involved...President Bush is on a vendetta against TRIAL LAWYERS, for running up the cost of everything, breaking companies for no reason but mony and causing people to lose their jobs, and making it so the American people can hardly swim, ride or hardly any other type of recreation ANYWHERE.
32
posted on
03/13/2003 4:14:46 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
To: prophetic
What part of "Commander in Chief" does this idiot not understand?
33
posted on
03/13/2003 4:16:02 PM PST
by
admiralsn
(Except for ending slavery, fascism, nazism, and communism, war has NEVER solved anything.)
To: Grampa Dave
CCC - Mark of the Beast?
34
posted on
03/13/2003 4:19:40 PM PST
by
Magoo
To: Nick Danger
I think every Democrat in Congress should get very vocal on this issueMaybe we can arrange to get them Ken Starr to investigate ?
35
posted on
03/13/2003 4:22:45 PM PST
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Magoo
You add Conyers and you get CCCC!
36
posted on
03/13/2003 4:25:24 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: Grampa Dave
You're welcome, Dave.
BTW, next time some lefty nematode wants to bash GWB for his grandpa Prescott Bush's alleged sympathy for the nazis, you might want to counter with Ramsey Clark's father, one-time AG and Supreme Court Justice Tom Clark. During World War 2, the elder Clark was the US attorney in charge of rounding up Japanese-Americans on the West Coast.
We know now that there were probably good reasons for this, but Clark-worshipping lefties typically count it as an atrocity equal to Auschwitz and Buchenwald. Think I'm kidding? I recently heard a trotskyite professor (at Texas Tech, believe it or not) ask his class, "How can we condemn the Germans when we did the same thing ourselves to the Japanese-Americans?"
I buttonholed the offender at the faculty club a little later. He tried to change the issue by accusing me of interference, then he claimed that he was just trying to lead the students to think about the actual differences. He is either a grossly inept instructor or a grossly inept liar, and probably both, because no such discussion followed his remark; it was purely a rhetorical question asserting a claim that is provably false; and it was made at public expense to a captive audience. This guy was added to my "S-list", which is becoming a cast of thousands these days.. Moral equivalency is a disease, terrorism is a symptom, and the left is the chief vector.
To: atomic conspiracy
Re Clark's father, you might want to go to this link and read why he did what he did:
(link to Magic)
38
posted on
03/13/2003 4:33:39 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: prophetic
39
posted on
03/13/2003 4:37:58 PM PST
by
Stultis
To: prophetic
Bring it on, skiffy liberal rats!!
40
posted on
03/13/2003 6:01:40 PM PST
by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
(I'd rather have a sister in a brothel than a brother who's a Democrat.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson