Skip to comments.
Clinton Flack to Rush: Shut Up About Bin Laden Deal and Broaddrick Rape
NewsMax.com ^
| 3/07/03
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 03/07/2003 10:28:10 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-190 next last
To: Matchett-PI
Of course I would never listen to any program Clinton is on, and now no one else will have to either. Anybody picked out a 60 Minutes sponsor to boycott for the duration of BC's tenure? It should be a small-ticket item that is frequently purchased.
To: kattracks
Check Lockhart's chin. You'll find Clinton's DNA.
To: DoughtyOne
"I don't consider anyone who worked for Clinton to be a reliable source of commentary on any issue. You had to be compromised to work for the man."
Especially ol red faced Joe Lockhart. His tenure as press secretary for Bill the rapist was intense. Joe seems to have a problem, along with other Clinton associates (Albright, Berger, et al), they still think that they are running the white house on a parallel universe. Joe, Maddy, Sandy, sit down relax and have a cup of shut the F_ _ _ up!
To: MozartLover
Re #43
Fantastic. Wish I'd been so quick and correct. lol
Fregards,
BTW Did anyone think the brainless Crystal on Rush today made her case. (Sarcasm)
To: ironman
Lockhart still has Clinton's DNA dribbling off his chin..
Clinton's Criminal Administration is still trying to deny and avoid their true LEGACY.....as Corrupt, Incompetent, Traitorist criminals.......
The Truth is impossible to bury....
Semper Fi
105
posted on
03/07/2003 12:15:10 PM PST
by
river rat
(War works.....It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
To: Sacajaweau
"In hindsight, after 9-11, I wish I had gotten Bin Laden". Translation: "I wish 9/11 had happened when I was president. I could have gotten that deal for bin Laden and I would have been a hero and that would have been my legacy."
106
posted on
03/07/2003 12:16:33 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
To: kattracks
Lockhart is just continueing the MO he began as the WORST White House Press Secretary ever......nosing out DeeDee Myers and that kid Carter tried to pass off as his Secretary.
To: f.Christian
Like Rush said several years ago, "Peace" for socialists mean a lack of opposition.
To: Spook86
" I recommend anyone watching 60 Minutes tune out after the last story segment. That way, ratings for the last quarter-hour tank, and the program's overall average drops as well. If the "tuneout" is large enough, CBS will pull the plug on ol' Slick." I'll do better than that. I'll tune out for the whole thing. I hope it tanks faster than Phil Donohue. Who the heck wants to hear anything that Clinton has to say anyway? I couldn't wait to be able to actually NOT have that @$$h*le invading my home several times a day. I'd be out of my mind to actually invite him back. You have to remember though; this supreme jackass really thinks America loves him.
109
posted on
03/07/2003 12:22:21 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
To: Rockiesrider
Yep Lickhart hasn't quite figured it out that he's irrelevent how. Earth to Joe, we're over here.
110
posted on
03/07/2003 12:23:02 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 7, Staterooms As Low As $510 Per Person For Entire Week!)
To: Lexington Green
Check Lockhart's chin. You'll find Clinton's DNA. Ye gods, do you think he wears a thong too?
111
posted on
03/07/2003 12:26:01 PM PST
by
Wil H
To: ClearCase_guy
"CBS could replace Bob with, say ... Ann Coulter?" Teehee....now THAT I'd pay to watch! Of course, we all know that no way will Clinton ever take on a REAL woman; although I'll admit I'd love to hear what Ann would say to him when he tried to come on to her in the "green" room. Hidden camera anybody? ROTFL!
112
posted on
03/07/2003 12:26:03 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
To: ConservativeMan55
As Dashole said, "this sounds like Limbaugh-like threats to me. Such things should not be allowed as they might bring on the kooks with guns and then I'm not safe" (or words to that effect). Lockhart is remembered as the worst apologist for the multiple escapades of the Felon ever seen in any administration. The guy is nothing more than another clintinoid cretin needing jail time.
To: Dead Dog
I don't think we will see much 'debate' here.
Don't they normally do a 'point-counterpoint' format, where one week
Dole would lead off about the 'good of Viagra' and clinton
would get a couple of minutes to present the 'evil of Viagra'?
That way they don't really have to respond to anyone or anything, nice and safe....
TIME TO DUST OFF THE SHELVES AND REINSTITUTE THE
"DON'T BUY BOOKS FROM CROOKS" mantra....
114
posted on
03/07/2003 12:28:57 PM PST
by
xrmusn
To: Jeff Head
Aint that the truth, just like the Mafi, and the Father of Lies himself.
I met a very rational Brittish couple while watching the 4th of July celebration in Seattle (this was in 2000). Typical of so many British, they loved Clinton and couldn't understand why so many were against him. They were a little shocked when I suggested to them he was a tyrannt that would do anything to keep power. Funny thing is, I also suggest they watch the 2000 election, that it would be a political bloodbath. I hope they enjoyed the show.
The Democrats have become the poster children for distributed power and gun ownership.
To: kattracks
In a case like this, you have to ask yourself, "Why?". Why would Bill Clinton mention Rush Limbaugh when talking about his own new gig.
The answer is simple. It doesn't matter if they love you or hate you, as long as they get the name right. Publicity. Bill Clinton knows how many people listen to Rush each day. He lured Rush into a fight and Rush, once again, blindly jumped right in. By doing this, Bill Clinton has ensured that Rush will generate a viewing audience Monday evening that CBS could only have hoped for.
116
posted on
03/07/2003 12:31:50 PM PST
by
Hatteras
(The Thundering Herd Of Turtles ROCK!)
To: ConservativeMan55
I think Slick is trying to draw Rush out. Trying to provoke him into firing everything he's got at the Clintons so when Hillary runs for President, she can say..."You know, that's old news and there's no proof."
To: sweetliberty
I think you're right. However, had he been a diligent, caring leader, rather than disgusting piece of garbage that he was and is, he could have had Bin Laden and MORE of them and likely the revealed plans of their future actions and fulfilled the duties of a President that were entrusted to him.
In the long run, his true colors were revealed before the entire nation and we have learned that "THE PEOPLE CAN BE TURNED TO ELECT AN UNPRINCIPLED LEADER. In hindsight however, had he been impeached, we would have wound up with Gore and he's such a dork, I'm not sure where the hell we would be. I would guess that is how many people who voted against his removal felt and wisely so.
I STAND WITH MY PRESIDENT. I BELIEVE HE IS TRYING TO PROTECT US WITH EVERY FORCE AVAILABLE. SADDAM MUST BE REMOVED BEFORE HE SELLS SOME OF HIS GOODS IF HE HASN'T ALREADY.
118
posted on
03/07/2003 12:44:20 PM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(Hillary: Constitutional Scholar! NOT)
To: Wil H
Too bad CBS is the wuss network. Your idea would pull more viewers. Then again, CBS doesn't care about viewers, they care about sucking up to Clinton. I keep forgetting...:
Actually, I think the perfect pairing would be clinton v Coulter.
119
posted on
03/07/2003 12:58:24 PM PST
by
GOPJ
To: Wil H
Too bad CBS is the wuss network. Your idea would pull more viewers. Then again, CBS doesn't care about viewers, they care about sucking up to Clinton. I keep forgetting...:
Actually, I think the perfect pairing would be clinton v Coulter.
120
posted on
03/07/2003 12:58:26 PM PST
by
GOPJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-190 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson