Skip to comments.
CAUTIOUS HILLARY PLAYS BOTH SIDES IN WAR GAME
New York Post ^
 | 2/27/03
 | DEBORAH ORIN
Posted on 02/27/2003 12:56:43 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:12:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
February 27, 2003 -- ANTI-WAR fever is all the rage in the Democratic Party these days, but candidate-in-waiting Hillary Clinton is carefully sidestepping it, even though the left is often seen as her natural base.
Sen. Clinton (D-N.Y.) voted to authorize an Iraq attack last fall but she's just about invisible on the issue lately, not speaking out for or against military action even though she's on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 
    
1
posted on 
02/27/2003 12:56:43 AM PST
by 
kattracks
 
To: kattracks
    "CAUTIOUS HILLARY PLAYS BOTH SIDES IN WAR GAME"
KEYWORDS: "PLAYS" "GAMES"
2
posted on 
02/27/2003 1:07:20 AM PST
by 
Cindy
 
To: kattracks
    She's also playing the same game with the Estrada nomination. 
 She's supporting the filibuster against Estrada, but has not been vocal about her opposition, unlike her NY colleague, Chuck Schumer (D). This way she can placate the Al-Queda wing of the Democratic party and not alienate Latinos.
 
To: kattracks
    It's plain to see - Hillary is no leader..
Hell, she's not even a good follower!
At her core - she's only a leftist whore...
Semper Fi
4
posted on 
02/27/2003 1:31:36 AM PST
by 
river rat
(Help save the planet ...... Work toward the extinction of Jihadists....ARM THYSELF)
 
To: kattracks
    Much as I detest Ms Clinton, she is the only democRAT leader (sic) who has played the political aspect of Iraq correctly. She's kept her mouth shut.
To: kattracks
    One day, just wait and see, one day it is all going to catch up with her. Of course some could care less if she were to kill 56 old ladies on the steps of the capital in broad daylight.
To: kattracks
    I thought it was common knowledge that she went both ways...
To: FenianOfEire
    well put
8
posted on 
02/27/2003 2:47:35 AM PST
by 
The Wizard
(Demonrats are enemies of America)
 
To: All
9
posted on 
02/27/2003 2:49:40 AM PST
by 
backhoe
(Has that Clinton "legacy" made you feel safer- yet?)
 
To: river rat
    Following in her rapist's husbands footsteps because he said the exact things about the First Gulf War....I didn't support it, but I would have voted for it...or...I wouldn't have voted for it , but I supported it. 
 NEVER Trust a Democrat....NEVER!!
 
10
posted on 
02/27/2003 2:55:24 AM PST
by 
Claire Voyant
((visualize whirled peas))
 
To: kattracks
    It all depends on what the definition of Cautious is. In this case, it means two-faced, lying Bit**...
11
posted on 
02/27/2003 4:20:28 AM PST
by 
trebb
 
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson