SECRETARY-GENERAL CLINTON? (BE VERY AFRAID ALERT!)

Pittsburghlive.com ^ | 2/16/03 | Pittsburgh-Tribune Review

[Wait4Truth]

Once again the future of Bill Clinton has become a hot topic that rivals

[HAL9000]

The position of U.N. Secretary General does not have the powers a Clinton would want. The President of the United States has far more power than the Secretary General of the UN, e.g. -

* Strong executive powers.

* The right of veto.

* Commander-in-Chief of a first-rate military organization.

* Nuclear weapons and ICBMs.

[JimRed]

Now I'm convinced; he IS the Antichrist!

[WVNan]

I don't know about the 1962 date (as if anybody could know), but I have always felt that clinton may truly be the Anti-Christ. I see pure evil whenever I'm forced to look at him. I never look at him voluntarily because it makes me physically ill. If he ever survives a head injury it will be time for Christians to start looking toward the Eastern sky.

[Howlin]

[Glock17]

He may very well renounce his US citizenship on the premise that he is a "citizen of the world". Power is all that matters to this clown.

[InvisibleChurch]

nothing to be scared of...he'll only prove he's as useless as a world leader as he was president of the United States

[I got the rope]

I agree...they will have a trial for him (Bosnia)before they make him Sec-gen.

[citizenx7]

"As of right now, WJC would have to either renounce his US citizenship or the US would have to withdraw from at least the SC , probably the UN. The SG cannot be chosen from a country with a permanent slot on the SC."

This will not be a problem as UN is working to eliminate veto, and democratize Security Council.

[Just mythoughts]

How about Israel that is the only country where he vowed to suit up and fight for.

[dixiechick2000]

"...The U.N. would have to change its rules for this to happen, but I think they just might do that."

Thanks for the ping.

You are right...they would have to change their rules. The Secretary General can not be from a country that is a permanent member of the Security Council. Would they change their rules? I don't know, but it wouldn't surprise me if they did.

Another thought...did Billy Jeff buy a home in Ireland? I seem to remember he was looking at a place there.

As an aside, he has been running all over the world undermining the Bush administration and the US, and I wouldn't be surprised if he is behind an emboldened France, Germany and Belgium.

[dfwgator]

Well if they can have a Nazi like Kurt Waldheim as SG, Clinton would fit right in.

[dixiechick2000]

BTW, I believe this has been his goal all along.

President (for life) of the World

[ssgharig]

The US will then be subjugated to the ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT that we have to fear. It is all apart of the Liberal's plan to level the playing field. We are not all equal, we are American's and live in the greatest nation on earth. Let's keep it that way

[kaylar]

I know. Their target date is 2008 for the accomplishment that "reform". Hopefully, that'll be the catalyst that will get us out of the UN(if we're not already out long before, or if-even better-the UN goes the way of the League of Nations ).

[mlmr]

Why do you say Clinton would not be UN Sec Gen? It seems to me to be the next obvious career move.

[ez]

I think it's against UN rules for SG to be from a state that's a permanent member of the security council.

Since when did "rules" ever matter to bill clinton? I'm sure the mechanism for waiving or changing the rules was the simplest facet of this plan...

[SevenDaysInMay]

The world socialist movement sorely misses their 5th column co-presidents. That is why our Old Europe/still communist, aka fascist, allies are doing their best with Russia and China to ensnare GW-XY43 and our visionary Coalition of the Willing.

I have faith that disease will take Bill and Hillary from us before an XXX42/General Secretary and an XX44 Hillary could destroy our Constitution through treaties and their special kind of treasonous treachery.

Rule 308 section 223 paragraphs 22 through 45, and 50, defends our Constition from all enemies, both foreign and domestic, as sworn by millions of honorable and willing men and women.

[PhiKapMom]

You are right! It is AGAINST the United Nations charter to have the Secretary General come from a permanent members of the Security Council. France, Great Britain, Russia, France, or the United States will never have a citizen become Secretary General. We have debunked this several times on here. This is a British writer who didn't bother to check out the Charter and most likely listen to his pal Clinton! Third world countries are not going to give up the one job they can get and give it to any citizen of the United States -- even Bill Clinton.

[Paulie]

This is but one of the many reasons that Bush REALLY should have put both Clintons away from the get-go of the administration, and promptly fired all Clinton holdovers. I can't imagine the rationale for failing to do this, but we'll pay dearly for this for a long time to come.

[PhiKapMom]

The United States has veto power over any rule change. The writer of this article is just talking when he said other countries are on board.

This is being floated by Clinton without any basis in fact!

No way is Great Britain or any of the permanent members going to allow anyone from this Country to head the UN -- they give lip service to Clinton but none of them are dumb enough to want him running the UN!

Not going to happen no matter how much this writer in Clinton's hip pocket wants it to happen.

We have much more important things to think of than this old rumor that keeps floating around.