Skip to comments.
SECRETARY-GENERAL CLINTON? (BE VERY AFRAID ALERT!)
Pittsburghlive.com ^
| 2/16/03
| Pittsburgh-Tribune Review
Posted on 02/16/2003 8:11:15 AM PST by Wait4Truth
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:02:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Once again the future of Bill Clinton has become a hot topic that rivals
(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; unsecretay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: rintense
Ironically, in the 'Left Behind' books, it is the UN Secretary General who is the anti-christ.I read someplace that the anti-Christ was born in 1962. I pray that is true because if clinton is the anti-Christ, we are in even more trouble than we have imagined.
41
posted on
02/16/2003 8:34:03 AM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(God Bless our President!)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Clinton will never be willing to wait 22 years.
He must have a plan in the works already.
Only reason he gives Bush any credit is to avoid the TREASON label we would all give him!
42
posted on
02/16/2003 8:36:17 AM PST
by
3D-JOY
To: Wait4Truth
The sad part is that I asked myself how much worse he could be than the anti-American dictator appeasing asses we've already had in there.
To: sinkspur
The Clintons can still jerk the chains of the FR members..... I bet they have a laugh a day while doing it. As long as people can't let them go they will be up front and center....
44
posted on
02/16/2003 8:36:50 AM PST
by
deport
(RATTY RATS are everywhere..... thread hoppers they are..)
To: HAL9000
lol
but it really isn't a joke it is their plan.
45
posted on
02/16/2003 8:38:23 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: volchef
Lose the support of his admirers?
Just who else could you support?
46
posted on
02/16/2003 8:38:41 AM PST
by
3D-JOY
To: Wait4Truth
47
posted on
02/16/2003 8:39:21 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Bu-bye SADdam. You're soon to meet your buddy Stalin in Hades.)
To: All
. Click
wav or
mp3 to hear Clinton..
48
posted on
02/16/2003 8:40:32 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Bu-bye SADdam. You're soon to meet your buddy Stalin in Hades.)
To: Wait4Truth
There was a thread a couple of days ago that Bill might vie to become the next PM of Britain, since, apparently, the PM does not have to be a Brit.
It seems the Clinton name will be circulated for the next decade---finding a new job for Bill, and Hillary's upwardness. They won't go away. Can America survive? Can the World survive? Alas, Armageddon is at hand and Clinton is thy name (LOL).
49
posted on
02/16/2003 8:40:33 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: 3D-JOY
I knew that comment was going to stir things up a bit. Listen, I voted for Bush and I support him, but I also have principle core values that I will not waiver on and if Bush caves (which I don't think he will) I will not vote for him in the next primary. I am praying that Bush is the man that I believe him to be and that's a strong leader who will not be bullied by the communist UN, but if he waivers more people than just myself will jump ship.....to whomever distinguishes himself as vocally anti UN
50
posted on
02/16/2003 8:47:02 AM PST
by
volchef
(Visualize whirrled peas.)
To: Wait4Truth
Might be, remember Bill is hard to control, he has no self-discipline, has one thing on his mind, but puts feel good words out for his worshipers.
Bill is more the partier, get along, go along guy, while Hillary is the organizer, and the discipline behind the scenes. Think what they might have accomplished if Bill could have been controlled. There is no way she has forgotten what he put her through, let alone forgiven him.
As POTUS she would have the power to remove him permanently from the face of the earth, so if he really wanted it she might not stand in his way.
They stay married in my opinion, because if they divorce then they no longer have protection under the law of spousal testifing in a court of law.
Based upon Bill still woman hunting, he is Hillary's tool to martial support around the world to bring down Bush, you know those weekly visits to see her, collect all that secret data from her position in Senate.
Lots of things to consider from these two.
To: TLBSHOW; ALOHA RONNIE; Howlin; Liz; Mudboy Slim
...the U.N.'s towering Secretariat Building on Turtle Bay is more than 50 years old, crumbling and is overdue for rebuilding.Rent a really big boat, load their crap on it, and ship it overseas...
"...they'd rather have somebody who's strong and wrong..."
Never forget - *Squirt was impeached for serial perjury...
To: Wait4Truth
This idea was floated on FR several years ago during his presidency. Think about bill as Sec. Gen. of the UN & hillary as president of the US at the same time. Don't tell me they haven't thought about it. This is the plan.
53
posted on
02/16/2003 8:50:08 AM PST
by
Ditter
To: Fitzcarraldo
I think it's against UN rules for SG to be from a state that's a permanent member of the security council.
It is against the rules. One of the ways the bigger nations persuaded the smaller nations to join the UN was the rule that required that the secretary-general from being chosen from one of the smaller nations.
To make Clinton the secretary-general would require a complete revamping of the UN charter.
There are plenty of things for conservatives to worry about, this is not one of them, Clinton can no more be the secretary-general than he can run again for president.
Besides, I honestly doubt the UN will last to the end of the decade. We should start refering to it as the League of Nations, its history will soon be the same as that long defunct and unlamented institution.
To: doug from upland; kcvl
ping!
55
posted on
02/16/2003 8:51:21 AM PST
by
nutmeg
(Liberate Iraq - Support Our Troops!)
To: Just mythoughts
I agree, and now with her on the Armed Forces Committee, those fears are only magnified. Anybody that wants to laugh off the clintons and consider them to be no real harm are, IMHO, fools.
56
posted on
02/16/2003 8:52:01 AM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(God Bless our President!)
To: Wait4Truth
As evil as I knew Clinton to be, I thought we'd seen the last of him except for pathetic attempts for publicity or behind-the-scenes string pulling.
This is scarey - time to seriously make every effort to get out of the U-effing-N.
To: TomGuy
There was a thread a couple of days ago that Bill might vie to become the next PM of Britain, since, apparently, the PM does not have to be a Brit. Lets just hope he doesnt!
58
posted on
02/16/2003 8:52:16 AM PST
by
widgysoft
(< Woo and Yay! >)
To: redheadtoo
I hope you are right.
59
posted on
02/16/2003 8:54:44 AM PST
by
Ditter
To: redheadtoo
To make Clinton the secretary-general would require a complete revamping of the UN charter. He could renounce his citizenship and take up a citizenship status of a small country...
Just a thought
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson