Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2003 4:13:15 PM PST by RedhairRedhair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
hey what happened to drudge's flashing red light???
62 posted on 02/08/2003 4:40:18 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod (Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
Lock and load.
89 posted on 02/08/2003 4:50:20 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
Side note
I was flipping channels and hit on the Capitol Gang ( which I had ceased watching)
A l Hunt and Margret Carlson where arguing against Saddam and Novak was defending him
I thought I was in a time warp
Only saw 2 minutes. I still can't stand those boobs
115 posted on 02/08/2003 5:01:38 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
GW doesn't give a rat's behind for the UN, France, or Germany.

The best move would be to strike while the collectivists stare at their navel. That way, they have no say after it is over.

The time is now.
116 posted on 02/08/2003 5:01:46 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair

Nuff said

135 posted on 02/08/2003 5:10:41 PM PST by Gamecock (The friendship of the French is like their wine, exquisite, but of short duration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
I remember that right before Hati We sent a diplomat that told them you have a couple hours the planes are in the air. Wonder if thats whats up with Blix's visit
141 posted on 02/08/2003 5:14:41 PM PST by tort_feasor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
Bush will only attack after Feb. 15
162 posted on 02/08/2003 5:23:45 PM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
We have drawn countless lines in the sand and Saddam has crossed every one. Is THIS yet another line?
177 posted on 02/08/2003 5:28:55 PM PST by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
...HILLARY RODHAM's new seat on our U.S. Senate's Armed Services Committee =

...SADDAM probably already knows EVERYTHING.
183 posted on 02/08/2003 5:31:17 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ( ..Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LzXRay.com .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair

191 posted on 02/08/2003 5:34:30 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina (optional tag line, printed after my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
Britain and America are drawing up plans to give Saddam Hussein as little as 48 hours to flee Baghdad or face war, if UN weapons inspectors report this week that the Iraqi dictator is still refusing to disarm fully.

The proposals will form the framework of a long-awaited second resolution, which could be put before the Security Council by next weekend.

The deadline would be just long enough for Arab neighbours to make a last effort to persuade Saddam to leave the country, according to US officials, or for a coup to take place. The shortest timeframe to emerge from private diplomatic discussions has been two days.

The phrasing of the new, deliberately concise UN resolution would deny Saddam a fresh chance to say that he will comply with Security Council demands. Britain will put forward the resolution because Washington "does not want to be seen to need it", according to a senior Security Council diplomat.

Foreign Office officials confirmed that Saudi Arabia has offered to take Saddam if he goes into exile. Last month Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, said he would be "delighted" if Saddam fled Iraq.

"To avoid a war, I would personally recommend that some provision be made so that the senior leadership and their families could be provided haven in some other country," he said.

To be passed, the new resolution would require the support of nine of the 15 Security Council members, assuming there was no veto from France, China or Russia. British and American officials last night made clear that they do not expect a unanimous vote in its favour but are confident that a veto can be avoided.

"The resolution being discussed would declare that Saddam is in material breach of UN resolutions, which authorises the use of all necessary means to disarm him," one senior Security Council diplomat said.

America and Britain are, however, determined to avoid a second resolution which would enable Saddam further to delay disarmament. "The last thing they want is a decision which just starts the process towards another decision," said the diplomat.

From the telegraph(UK)

210 posted on 02/08/2003 5:41:39 PM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
bump
214 posted on 02/08/2003 5:43:22 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
Gang-I hate to break this to you but this war is not starting until at least March. Depending on how you define the start of the war, there is quite simply not enough combat power until then to kick this thing off until then.
314 posted on 02/08/2003 6:37:03 PM PST by DoSomethingAboutIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair

Exciting, isn't it?

320 posted on 02/08/2003 6:39:28 PM PST by The Great Satan (Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
Why isn't this articele posted, instead of a link to a link?
346 posted on 02/08/2003 6:57:28 PM PST by Libertina (Get rid of Jim McDermRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
There is nothing about this now on Drudge's site.

Either:
1) He took it off because it was wrong and he got a call from one of his sources telling him so, or..............

2) He took it off because it was right and he got a call from a "friend" telling him "ix-nay the ews-nay".

351 posted on 02/08/2003 7:07:22 PM PST by DoctorMichael (Commie Dik-taters SuK; South Korean Enablers SuK even more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
Saddam should not be allowed to leave this easily. He needs to leave feet first and at room temperature.
380 posted on 02/08/2003 8:12:16 PM PST by Sparta (Statism is a mental illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Attack on Iraq Betting Pool
416 posted on 02/09/2003 4:42:00 AM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedhairRedhair
It's a little late in the game to post this and I don't know if anyone else did yet, but after Drudge deletes this story, if anyone wants the URL to the site that posted it, here it is:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/02/09/wirq09.xml&sSheet=/portal/2003/02/09/ixportaltop.html
US and Britain give Saddam just 48 hours to leave Iraq
By Julian Coman in Washington and Colin Brown
(Filed: 09/02/2003)
417 posted on 02/09/2003 4:48:52 AM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson