Skip to comments.
BLAIR AND BUSH TO GIVE SADDAM JUST 48 HOURS TO LEAVE IRAQ...
Drudge ^
Posted on 02/08/2003 4:13:15 PM PST by RedhairRedhair
DEVELOPING...
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 421-429 next last
To: JA
I think I remember that the misprounciation meant 'dunkey' and was meant as an insult and message. Me too. "Horse's A$$" or some such thing.
I'll tell you what's frustrating me this evening. The boot-licking dunkey is coming through for "Ja-Hans" & causing him to describe their cooperation as significant. Like, STOP, he's cooperating now! He's tossed us several bones! And of course, the game would go on... if the President hadn't already declared it over (THANK YOU!).
101
posted on
02/08/2003 4:56:40 PM PST
by
condi2008
(Pro Libertate)
To: All
I know that this may not mean much, but Hannity said last night that they were doing a special H&C's on Iraq on Sunday night....hmmmmmm
btw...did anyone watch the Beltway Boys tonight...Ron(those are our planes now)Silver has done a complete 360....he loves Bush and his policies....I have to take back everything I ever said about him......watch it if it is repeated.
102
posted on
02/08/2003 4:56:48 PM PST
by
mystery-ak
(Operation Snuggles Freedom: paid Snuggles ransom and they still won't release him...please help!)
To: Peach
If I was POSITIVE that we will go in get rid of Saddam, get rid of his military, and not have someone worse, I'd be more for it. After leaving him in power last time, I've lost some optimism. Anything less than taking Saddam out will be really disapointing to me.
I'm just not sure if we are going to take him out, or going to disable his military.
I'm definitely for getting rid of him. Just not sure how we should do it.
I'm sure there are plenty of iraqis hoping we attack as well.
103
posted on
02/08/2003 4:56:52 PM PST
by
KneelBeforeZod
(Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets)
To: mystery-ak
I saw Ron Silver and was surprised at his pro-American stance. Happily surprised.
104
posted on
02/08/2003 4:57:58 PM PST
by
Peach
To: Positive
Don't worry Airbus tails seem to fall off on their own.
I know plenty of airline mechanics that think so... (United and Jet Blue)
There are at least 2 on FR, but I don't think I've ever seen them on those airbus threads we had...
105
posted on
02/08/2003 4:58:15 PM PST
by
KneelBeforeZod
(Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets)
To: Peach
Totally agree with you, Peach. If anything, the longer we wait, the longer it gives France and Germany time to move their obstructionist plan to set up a semi-permanent inspections regime backed by "UN soldiers." (Of course, there are no such forces unless the member states supply them, but why quibble.) The U.S. and Britain are likely to veto any such plan. But the real harm comes in strengthening the hand of those who whine about "unilateral" action. This is a gambit by France and Germany to protect their huge financial interests in Iraq, as well as to dominate the EU. Here's hoping France and Germany have waited too long, and that Bush and Blair will give the order very soon. Any plan that leaves Hussein and his gang in power is no plan at all far as I'm concerned.
To: All
I have a question. When we start attacking military targets where chems/bios may be stored, what happens then? Do they get dispersed or is the explosion enough to incinerate everything making it a non-threat?
Would we also want to "preserve" some also as evidence to the nay sayers?
Thanks.
To: section9
If he starts setting the wells on fire - couldn't we just then wait for his country to fall apart from the lack of income?
108
posted on
02/08/2003 4:59:59 PM PST
by
M. Peach
(eschew obsfucation)
To: Peach
I suspect we're looking at early March. Among other considerations, the British press has reported the 7th Armored Division won't be loading its tanks at ports in Germany until this weekend and will need a couple of weeks on the ground before they're ready.
109
posted on
02/08/2003 5:00:42 PM PST
by
caltrop
To: KneelBeforeZod
If we don't take out Saddam AND the weapons and stay around a while to monitor things, I'll be deeply disappointed as well. That's the only part that isn't being shared with us and for reasons I understand (I think). If we have someone in mind, we don't want to telecast that to Saddam or that person and their family is toast. Tom Brokaw said the other night that when one can get everyday Joe's away from their handlers in Iraq, they are begging to be released from the hell they've lived under for years. The book The Threatening Storm, by Kenneth Pollack, received a Foreign Council Policy award and is excellent on the subject. Pollack is considered one of a few worldwide experts on Saddam and Iraq and well worth the read. Regards, Peach
110
posted on
02/08/2003 5:00:47 PM PST
by
Peach
To: David1; Registered
"Just say no to frogs." Calling all artists, need a new bumper sticker
An ugly frog inside a red circle with a slash through it. The new internation symbol for No Frogs
111
posted on
02/08/2003 5:00:54 PM PST
by
BreitbartSentMe
(DUBYA (Don't Underestimate Bush You A$$hole))
To: Wolfstar
This is perfect timing.
First the Orange alert.
Then the airspace changes around Washington.
Now the 48 hour alert.
It's all falling into place.
112
posted on
02/08/2003 5:01:04 PM PST
by
LiveFreeOrDie2001
(Justice will be served, and the battle will rage, this BIG DOG will fight when you rattle it's cage.)
To: Peach
No matter what, there are so many conflicting signs out there now that Saddam won't know whether he's coming or going. Hehehehe..
113
posted on
02/08/2003 5:01:32 PM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(God Bless our President!)
To: Wolfstar
Ditto, everything you said (and so much better than I did!)
114
posted on
02/08/2003 5:01:34 PM PST
by
Peach
To: RedhairRedhair
Side note
I was flipping channels and hit on the Capitol Gang ( which I had ceased watching)
A l Hunt and Margret Carlson where arguing against Saddam and Novak was defending him
I thought I was in a time warp
Only saw 2 minutes. I still can't stand those boobs
115
posted on
02/08/2003 5:01:38 PM PST
by
uncbob
To: RedhairRedhair
GW doesn't give a rat's behind for the UN, France, or Germany.
The best move would be to strike while the collectivists stare at their navel. That way, they have no say after it is over.
The time is now.
116
posted on
02/08/2003 5:01:46 PM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
To: Diddle E. Squat
"But the key is when does that 48 hours start? Now, or Valentine's Day, or March 1st...
Exactly .... Or next Christmas... I don't think it will be before Friday, unless B & B know that Blix is going to tell the UN that Sadam has finally seen the light and is cooperating fully.
117
posted on
02/08/2003 5:02:12 PM PST
by
lstanle
Drudge needs to update this story soon.
Lately he's had a lot of "DEVELOPING" stories that turned out to be garbage. Or just disappeared.
118
posted on
02/08/2003 5:02:27 PM PST
by
KneelBeforeZod
(Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets)
To: Ichneumon
Heck, ostriches are fiercer warriors than the French. An ostrich can rip you from stem to stern with one nasty kick. The French, on the other hand, would run from stem to stern with one hint of trouble.
To: caltrop
You could be right about early March, but considering it's tanks we're talking about, they won't be needed until the air war is over (ten days or so after the start probably). Having said that, perhaps a military person could explain why we would need/want tanks prior to the end of the air war.
120
posted on
02/08/2003 5:03:25 PM PST
by
Peach
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 421-429 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson