Posted on 02/08/2003 4:13:15 PM PST by RedhairRedhair
DEVELOPING...
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
We'll also need the ground forces there to process all the Iraqi's that will be surrendering (the outer ring of conscripts, not the ones defending Bagdad). Seriously, I don't think we're going to let loose with the B-52's like we did before, because all we would end up doing is killing alot of soldiers that really just want to go home and take Saddam out themselves.
AQ has nothing to do with it. Saddam surrendered (in '91) and agreed to certain terms. We agreed to CEASE FIRE in return. He has violated all those terms. Thus, cease fire no longer holds. This will be a continuation of hostilities, not pre-emptive.
Carry a big stick, but walk softly.
Really? Well, if there's a way, he'll find it. Even if he has to buy a house in Iraq.
Actually he pronounced it "Saddum" which is reported to mean "shoeshine boy". The "Saddam" pronunciation denotes someone "powerful and respected". Bush did it as a put down.
You're probably right. I just don't like seeing the UN box us in and I don't want our troops getting desensitized (or whatever the military term is) and having the weather get too hot. But, you are correct and I'm sure President Bush will do whatever is right, even if it means giving the useless UN more time to try and figure out how to do the right thing.
Well.... not exactly true. There is still time, even IF you stick to your belief that the moon makes a difference. ...See the calendar to the right. Its dates are off by 4, so tomorrow (Sunday Feb 9th) will be like the (Sunday '13') shown on that calendar.
The moon will be at HALF tomorrow night (called '1st Quarter'), but that also means there will STILL be half the nighttime hours where the moon is behind the earth. So it will be totally pitch black for about 6 hours from roughly midnight to sunrise!
Monday evening, the moon will be slightly more than half, so the total-blackout period will be shorter, but we'll still have 5 hours of NO-MOON at all.
After 2 nights of bombing, the Moon won't matter anymore, assuming it mattered in the first place.
Note - The times below might seem wierd because Baghdad is not centered within its timezone, (and the evening of Feb 09 is same as the morning of Feb 10). Baghdad MoonSet/Sunrise times will be as follows:
Eve/Morning MoonSet... SunRise Pitch-Darkess Feb 08/09 1:12am 7:53am 6hrs 39min Sun Feb 09/10 2:08am 7:52am 5hrs 46m Mon Feb 10/11 3:06am 7:51am 4hrs 45m Tue Feb 11/12 4:05am 7:50am 3hrs 45m Wed Feb 12/13 5:04am 7:49am 2hrs 45m Thu Feb 13/14 5:59am 7:48am 1hr 49m
Eve/Morning SunSet... MoonRise Pitch-Darkness Fri Feb 21/22 6:52pm 11:57pm 5hrs 05min Sat Feb 22/23 6:53pm 1:06am 6hrs 13m Sun Feb 23/24 6:54pm 2:15am 7hrs 21m Mon Feb 24/25 6:55pm 3:22am 8hrs 27m Tue Feb 25/26 6:55pm 4:24am 9hrs 12m Wed Feb 26/27 6:56pm 5:20am 10hrs 11m Thu Feb 27/28 6:57pm 6:08am 11hrs 10m Fri Feb 28/01 6:58pm 7:31am total blackout
I also like the rest of your guy's theories... Soften 'em up for a while with cruise missles.
He sure did. How many times have his troops shot at allied planes patrolling the no fly zones??
Very well said. He quite clearly senses the danger and is alerting us to it.
US and Britain give Saddam just 48 hours to leave Iraq
By Julian Coman in Washington and Colin Brown
(Filed: 09/02/2003)
Britain and America are drawing up plans to give Saddam Hussein as little as 48 hours to flee Baghdad or face war, if UN weapons inspectors report this week that the Iraqi dictator is still refusing to disarm fully.
The proposals will form the framework of a long-awaited second resolution, which could be put before the Security Council by next weekend.
The deadline would be just long enough for Arab neighbours to make a last effort to persuade Saddam to leave the country, according to US officials, or for a coup to take place. The shortest timeframe to emerge from private diplomatic discussions has been two days.
The phrasing of the new, deliberately concise UN resolution would deny Saddam a fresh chance to say that he will comply with Security Council demands. Britain will put forward the resolution because Washington "does not want to be seen to need it", according to a senior Security Council diplomat.
Foreign Office officials confirmed that Saudi Arabia has offered to take Saddam if he goes into exile. Last month Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, said he would be "delighted" if Saddam fled Iraq.
"To avoid a war, I would personally recommend that some provision be made so that the senior leadership and their families could be provided haven in some other country," he said.
To be passed, the new resolution would require the support of nine of the 15 Security Council members, assuming there was no veto from France, China or Russia. British and American officials last night made clear that they do not expect a unanimous vote in its favour but are confident that a veto can be avoided.
"The resolution being discussed would declare that Saddam is in material breach of UN resolutions, which authorises the use of all necessary means to disarm him," one senior Security Council diplomat said.
America and Britain are, however, determined to avoid a second resolution which would enable Saddam further to delay disarmament. "The last thing they want is a decision which just starts the process towards another decision," said the diplomat.
Sorry, The Bushies are WAY Smarter than those Fools trying to "second guess" our impending Destruction of "Wahabbi Islam!"
Mecca, Medina, Qom, etc., continue to exist ONLY because us "JudeoChristians" continue to be Tolerant of ALL "Religions!"
"Wahabbi Islam" will soon join it's philosophical twin--Naziism, as Quasi-Religions created to enslave the ignorant. Both "religions" are EVIL, & WILL BE DESTROYED!!
I hope!
Doc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.