Skip to comments.
BREAKING NEWS: Saddam has authorized commanders to use chemical weapons in event of war
Heard on Radio Minutes Ago ^
| 2/6/2003
| President George W. Bush
Posted on 02/06/2003 1:50:04 PM PST by ex-Texan
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. INTERCEPTS IRAQI TRANSMISSION TO ACTIVATE CHEMICAL WEAPONS IMMEDIATELY
That is correct. Saddam has sent orders to Republican Guard in the field to activate weapons that Iraq claim 'do not exist.'
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: boom; bushpissed; chemicalweapons; dictator; dictatorship; disappearingarms; glassparkinglot; gulfwarii; hussein; iraq; madman; saddam; saddamhussein; terrorism; unincompetence; uninspectorsgoofed; wakeupeurope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-307 next last
To: Snowy
Bush: The Game Is Over
Thursday, February 06, 2003 WASHINGTON Saddam Hussein continues to defy the world, and now the world must take action immediately to stop him, President Bush said at the White House Thursday. "The game is over. The danger Saddam Hussein poses reaches across the world," Bush said, with Secretary of State Colin Powell standing at his side. "The Security Council must show whether its words have any meaning. The Security Council must not back down when its words are defied and mocked by a dictator." The president said the United States would endorse a second Security Council resolution, which would presumably declare Iraq in material breach and authorize the use of military force.
To: RaceBannon
Toughest president since Truman. Thank God for this man.
42
posted on
02/06/2003 2:02:06 PM PST
by
Let's Roll
(Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.)
To: wimpycat
Today is a nice day to begin a war.
To: ex-Texan
WHOA THERE!
I saw Pres. Bush on CNN live and he stated that the intercept was that Iraqi field Commanders had been given the authorization to use their chemical weapons in combat. This reflects the "decentralization" of command which Iraq has pursued to deal with impending loss of C3.
To: Teacher317
Nobody is making us wait....
45
posted on
02/06/2003 2:02:48 PM PST
by
tracer
To: vannrox
IT IS IN THE AIR.
46
posted on
02/06/2003 2:02:54 PM PST
by
bulldogs
To: The Vast Right Wing
To: vannrox
Worldwide warning for Americans just issued
To: homeschool mama
Dontcha just love the smell of burning camels and goats first thing in the morning??
49
posted on
02/06/2003 2:04:13 PM PST
by
tracer
To: krodriguesdc
Tony Blair (after meeting with France) stated today that he expects NO vetoes of a second UN resolution to use violence to disarm Iraq.
50
posted on
02/06/2003 2:05:05 PM PST
by
cinFLA
To: bulldogs
That depends on your definition of "it".....
51
posted on
02/06/2003 2:05:08 PM PST
by
tracer
To: AmericanInTokyo
If I were in Baghdad as a reporter or trader, I'd get out tonight.Did you mean Traitor or trader?
To: yonif
Looks like Koffi Annon found someone to take to the dance. I wonder if Ron Paul let's him lead.
To: jpthomas
54
posted on
02/06/2003 2:05:31 PM PST
by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: ex-Texan
What do you have to say now PedoBoy?
To: Anti-Bolshevik
This is just the usual press release. "We would support a second resolution..."
By all the fuss going on here, you'd think we were sending the troops in right this minute.
56
posted on
02/06/2003 2:05:44 PM PST
by
jenny65
To: ex-Texan
Saddam has authorized commanders to use chemical weapons in event of war This is the last gasp of a desperate man. I'm not saying it might not be a devastating gasp. He's picked the wrong President to try this on, however. I hope that one month from now I'll be watching news footage of Iraqi citizens celebrating in the streets, holding up signs thanking the US and its allies for liberating them.
To: krodriguesdc
Quick, please, where did you get that?
58
posted on
02/06/2003 2:06:04 PM PST
by
Lee'sGhost
(To BOLDLY go . . . (no whimpy libs allowed).)
To: krodriguesdc
The president said the United States would endorse a second Security Council resolution, which would presumably declare Iraq in material breach and authorize the use of military force. The above is what is confusing me. It sounds to me like they want to go back to the UN. I hope I'm wrong. I don't want SoDamn to devise a good plan.
59
posted on
02/06/2003 2:06:33 PM PST
by
Snowy
(Tick off a lib -> Work hard, earn lots of money, and be happy)
To: All
I heard the speech on radio as they broke from the Sean Hannity show.
Our President was at his finest. GWB will still lead even if some anti-Amers wont follow.
Let Saddam use his gas.....just think, if he tries to gas Israel, we may not have to worry about sending US troops...
60
posted on
02/06/2003 2:07:06 PM PST
by
UCFRoadWarrior
(UN = Unpunished Nazis)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-307 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson