Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video shows shuttle may have shed debris over Arizona - check out this video taken by amateurs
The Dallas Morning News ^ | February 3, 2003 | By BYRON HARRIS / WFAA-TV

Posted on 02/04/2003 2:46:25 AM PST by MeekOneGOP


Video shows shuttle may have shed debris over Arizona

02/04/2003

By BYRON HARRIS / WFAA-TV

NEWS 8 EXCLUSIVE

There is now dramatic new evidence that the shuttle Columbia may have been in trouble before it disintegrated over Texas.

The spacecraft's demise may have begun much farther west - captured on tape in Arizona.

The sky over Wupatki National Monument was still dark Saturday morning when Scott and Chris Valentine got up early to shoot pictures of Columbia en route to a landing in Florida.

Also Online

Video: Amateur tape could hold clues

The Valentines were space fans, so they knew where the shuttle was supposed to be at a given time, and when it was supposed to fly overhead. When it was first sighted, they were initially ecstatic.

"That is cool ... it's cool," their voices can be heard saying on the videotape. "There are seven people in that thing!"

For a few grand seconds it was a space buff's dream: a dot of energy moving eastward into the dawn.

*
WFAA-TV
Amateur tape shows what appears to be an object breaking off Columbia over Arizona.

Then, as the young phtographer zoomed in for a final shot, the excitement turned to shock as a piece appeared to drop off the spacecraft.

"Look at the chunks falling off of it," said a voice on the tape. "What the heck is that?"

Columbia then sped out of view into the sunrise - and to its disintegration.

Minutes earlier, in California, two amateur astronomers took still photos as the shuttle passed over them. Their shots show a thickening of Columbia's contrail in two places, as if something may have dropped off there as well.

NASA said it has talked to witnesses in California about debris there. Now, this exclusive video may be a major piece in a puzzle that now has thousands of pieces.

"If we find any tile or structure upsteram of Fort Worth, New Mexico (or) Arizona - if that exists - that is extremely important to us," said NASA's Ron Dittemore.

In the video, it was dark because the sun rises east to west, and it was not yet fully light in Arizona.

But, visible in the corner of the video was the time of day - corresponding to 7:55 a.m. Dallas time, just a few minutes before the shuttle flew over Dallas.

The tape has now been turned over to NASA investigators.


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/latestnews/stories/wfaa030203_am_azvideo.1d7ff605.html


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: arizona; nasa; shuttlecolumbia; shuttledisaster; video
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: csvset
The problem as explained was the two dimentional view. A damaged tile that was 5 inches thick would look the same as one that had only a quarter inch remaining.
41 posted on 02/04/2003 5:40:27 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
The video at that link seems to have been removed. There are no links or pics on that page. Odd.

I checked it again, and it is working now. Perhaps server problems at the time you tried to view it?...

42 posted on 02/04/2003 5:46:09 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dtel
I'm sure we've all seen the (Doppler?), radar shot of the debris field as it settled over Texas. Would it be possible, feasible or worthwhile to go back and check similar weather radar scans starting out west, looking for any signs of debris falling off?

I realize that the radar in Texas was reflecting off of thousands of parts which is why it was so readily visable.

43 posted on 02/04/2003 5:48:46 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: csvset
I think it would be worth a try.
Satellite photos would also be useful, one would think.
I'm not so quick to dismiss the apartment fire in Dallas, that started just before the shuttle came overhead, anymore either.
You also have to think the smaller pieces over the western states may have burned up before hitting earth.
44 posted on 02/04/2003 5:55:00 AM PST by dtel (Texas Longhorn cattle for sale at all times. We don't rent pigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dtel
I have not followed the entire discussion. Is it really true there was no alternative at all to attempting re-entry with the crew on board?

Not enough fuel to reach the ISS?

No means of transferring crew without the docking adapter in the cargo bay?

It seems like a lousy choice, and it almost seems like NASA collectively closed their eyes and decided to hope. They had two weeks to diagnose a problem. They probably had technical means to do it in some way, using either ground-based imaging, satellite imaging, or the ISS.

If they found damage, they would have to improvise like hell to do something with that knowledge, with no guarantee of success.

I would prefer to know how bad my situation is. NASA may have made a different choice re the shuttle. Now they will be judged with hindsight. I wonder if that is the better outcome.
45 posted on 02/04/2003 6:09:42 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: eno_
It is my understanding there was not enough fuel to reach the ISS.
They were in the wrong orbit, for another matter.
The fact is these guys went up via a very large container of highly flammable fuel.
They are fully aware of the risks inherent in space exploration.
As far as fixing damage in space, there is no way, at this time to carry the appropriate materials. (20,000 different tiles)
There is no way, at this time, to remove and reinstall any damaged tiles in space, if they could carry the appropriate materials.
I would think the astronauts knew what their situation was, meaning I believe ground control talked with them, prior to re-entry.
They had two choices:
Fly around space until you expire.
Bring it home.
46 posted on 02/04/2003 6:27:35 AM PST by dtel (Texas Longhorn cattle for sale at all times. We don't rent pigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dtel
You also have to think the smaller pieces over the western states may have burned up before hitting earth.

Tiles burn up? Someone made the same mistake a day or two ago and I let it slip on by. Early drop off of tiles would certainly survive and fall to earth even as early as California.

47 posted on 02/04/2003 6:38:23 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: djf
ABC this morning (I know, I know) had a guy on who showed the tiles - showed that they are actually stacked one on top of another and then on the "pad" that is glued to the frame. The design is so that if the tile is hit, the top half will break off without major damage to the "under" tile or frame. The dangers are that something could break off the under tile as well as the upper tile or could actually break off the "pad" and leave the bare frame open to the heat. The metal of the frame melts at 900 degrees in a 2000 degree environment - not good. (He said). There have been other shuttles in which both top and under tile came off and a "burn through" occurred but the key was WHERE that happened - not in a critical place before. Also, the video of the insulation foam indicates the tiles could have been struck near or next do the wheel well "door" - which, if it came off in flight - would be catastrophic. But he did not know if this is what happened. A key question obviously is what is that piece that separated in this early video.

One other mention was made by the ABC reporters that NASA does have film from satellites of the shuttle over but these have been "classified" and not released to the public.

48 posted on 02/04/2003 6:44:07 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Thanks for the ping. What's interesting is that the normal config is shuttle bay exposed toward earth, tail forward. If these photos show a different config it says four things. They had to reconfig to take the photos. NASA's plausible denial of knowing photos were taken is bogus. NASA has been lying about their initial assessments of the damage from the insullation. NASA's overall trustworthyness has just plumeted to that of Bill Clinton.
49 posted on 02/04/2003 6:44:55 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Perhaps server problems at the time you tried to view it?...

Nope. I figured it out. I thought I had Real Player but remembered I removed that POS from my system a few weeks back.

All that shows to me is a set of frames with the little generic image icons with the circle, square and triangle in them. No biggie. I'm certainly not going to reload Real Player to show me something I already suspected...that Columbia was trailing debris from the moment it hit atmosphere and the crew was unaware until it was way too late. May God keep them close and protect their souls.


50 posted on 02/04/2003 6:48:20 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
>>...If we find any tile or structure upsteram of Fort Worth, New Mexico (or) Arizona - if that exists - that is extremely important to us," said NASA's Ron Dittemore....<<

It'd be nice if they would provide a precise ground track so the folks out there could know where to start to look.

51 posted on 02/04/2003 6:49:38 AM PST by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Tiles burn up?

Not if they are facing the direction they are supposed to.
What would happen as it is hurtling through space twisting and turning in every direction?
I don't pretend to know, just bringing it up.

52 posted on 02/04/2003 6:51:35 AM PST by dtel (Texas Longhorn cattle for sale at all times. We don't rent pigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dtel
The backing would certainly blow disintigrate. One aspect of the tile substance I hadn't considered is pulverization. The ceramic portion might not burn, but it might be turned to dust by atmospheric terbulence.
53 posted on 02/04/2003 6:57:42 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Yeah....... no fooling!
54 posted on 02/04/2003 6:59:25 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dtel
  1. Repeating excuses doesn't make them better.
  2. "Fully aware of the risks" -- No. Stat case proves it too. Rather at every level "risks" are filtered and excused, beyond safety.
  3. Chanting, in unison. "They were fully aware of the risks", does not excuse ONE SINGLE SOLITARY compromise in fact or inclination towards safety.
  4. "They had two choices" -- they didn't even open up the box to see if they had more. The "nothing we can do" attitude. The legal theory: "If you not informed, you are not liable."

55 posted on 02/04/2003 7:09:53 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
WOW! Thanks for the post.
56 posted on 02/04/2003 7:20:29 AM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Is it SOP for the USAF to photograph all shuttle flights? If not, why was this flight photographed? Do they photograph only flights only if there is a USAF experiment or USAF equipment to be deployed?

Certainly the photos must of sufficient quality to be of use. Would the USAF would take pictures of Columbia if not directed to?

Unless of course we have "rogue" USAF personnel snapping pics. I've seen posts stating that any pics are, "of low quality", " of little use", "it can't be done", "they can't use them to determine damage".

Why would the USAF take any pics if that's the case?

57 posted on 02/04/2003 7:32:25 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Good questions. Somehow I doubt that the Air Force would take photos if they didn't expect to get clear crisp detailed results. However, I'm sure some of the contributors to this and a few other threads will explain why they would, momentum being the force of nature that it is.
58 posted on 02/04/2003 7:39:35 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I seem to recall there is a limited ability of some military satellites to change into a lower orbit temporarily in order to accomplish a specific short term task. Such a change in orbit could even have been done for the shuttle pics, if they were serious enough. The detail might reveal the level of concern if nothing else. However, a high level of concern in DOD without explicit NASA prompting might cause further public and private fallout...
59 posted on 02/04/2003 8:18:17 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Mr Grammy has held tiles before (his dad helped develop them) and he says they feel more like styrofoam then ceramic. They are very very light, and easily scratched.
60 posted on 02/04/2003 8:31:51 AM PST by Grammy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson