Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dtel
  1. Repeating excuses doesn't make them better.
  2. "Fully aware of the risks" -- No. Stat case proves it too. Rather at every level "risks" are filtered and excused, beyond safety.
  3. Chanting, in unison. "They were fully aware of the risks", does not excuse ONE SINGLE SOLITARY compromise in fact or inclination towards safety.
  4. "They had two choices" -- they didn't even open up the box to see if they had more. The "nothing we can do" attitude. The legal theory: "If you not informed, you are not liable."

55 posted on 02/04/2003 7:09:53 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
What is your problem?
Do facts upset you?
Deal with it.
They were screwed buddy.
Bleed your heart out, it won't accomplish squat, but don't direct your rants at me.
I didn't design the effing POS.
73 posted on 02/04/2003 3:28:02 PM PST by dtel (Texas Longhorn cattle for sale at all times. We don't rent pigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson