Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: AmericanInTokyo
Good God. Will George Bush ever get a break? What next?
To: AmericanInTokyo
The scary thing is that the fuel rods have already moved .... which means that there is unaccountable plutonium bouncing around in NK .... God forbid it gets sold on the black market.
3 posted on
02/03/2003 3:03:29 PM PST by
Centurion2000
(The question is not whether you're paranoid, but whether you're paranoid enough.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
AmericanInTokyo, in addition to the news value of your post, you again demostrate the amazing reach and speed of FreeRepublic. Thanks for your post and for keeping us all informed.
5 posted on
02/03/2003 3:06:37 PM PST by
jigsaw
To: AmericanInTokyo
It seems that we are in for a wild ride during 2003. Hang tough and good luck to all.
9 posted on
02/03/2003 3:11:04 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: AmericanInTokyo
two front war here we go
To: AmericanInTokyo
"Axis of Evil, Pacific Front" - Bump!
11 posted on
02/03/2003 3:13:14 PM PST by
AmericanInTokyo
(How many Americans (especially John Lennon Give Peace a Chance Types) have seen these DPRK posters?)
To: AmericanInTokyo
IMHO, N Korea is the main threat to world peace and not Iraq. N Korea needs to be handled and handled now before this gets out of control.
18 posted on
02/03/2003 3:18:29 PM PST by
DaGman
To: AmericanInTokyo
20 posted on
02/03/2003 3:18:32 PM PST by
Cindy
To: AmericanInTokyo
23 posted on
02/03/2003 3:19:57 PM PST by
Cindy
To: AmericanInTokyo
There are really only two possibilities here. One, that Kim Jong il is insane and has sincere militaristic designs on his neighbors and intends to continue his support of axis nations. Two, that he his using the removal of the rods as an upping of the ante to gain concessions on power plant aid and other payola.
If it is the former, you can bet that US, Japanese, Russian and Chinese intelligence have jointly determined as much. In that case, I would expect a devastating attack that would leave counter-attack capabilties essentially destroyed. North Korea would be jointly occupied.
If it is the latter, my sense is that Kim Jong il has badly overplayed his hand, probably because he cannot distinguish Bush from Clinton (remembering how easy and fun it was to snooker a U.S. President). That is a gross miscalculation. It is one thing to pressure concessions by implication--this allows for face-saving appeasement in certain circumstances. Any concession in the face of ecpressed threats is akin to negotiating with terrorists, which is anathema to US foreign policy and national security. In this instance, I think the build up is more show--W's way of saying "get back in line now."
The smart money is on the latter scenario. My bet is that the build up scares Kim Jong il back into his rabbit hole.
I am a hedger, though. If this clown does not back down at once, I believe that we will see Rumsfeld's two front campaign. And I wil bet the farm that both operations are over in less than six weeks. The only difference is that in the case of a Korean conflict, in light of the proximity of Seoul to the DMZ and the number of U.S. troops on active duty in the South, we are MUCH more likely to use tactical nuclear weapons to overwhelm the enemy.
44 posted on
02/03/2003 3:59:24 PM PST by
Zebra
To: AmericanInTokyo
I'm not up on my "North Korean Politics," but what would happen if we left NK alone? I mean, seriously, why or why not would that be a good/bad idea?
45 posted on
02/03/2003 4:03:26 PM PST by
realpatriot71
(legalize freedom!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Add me to the list of folks who appreciate your thoughtful posts. Thanks again.
54 posted on
02/03/2003 4:53:54 PM PST by
LaGrone
To: AmericanInTokyo
Bumping...
59 posted on
02/03/2003 5:21:15 PM PST by
redhead
To: AmericanInTokyo
AIT -- thanks for the update...
What seems to be the emotional level of alarm or threat for the Japanese people if any, and is there some hue and cry for it's leaders to lean on NK politically, if not militarily?
To: AmericanInTokyo
LINKS OF INTEREST:
CNN.com: "NORTH KOREA NUCLEAR WORK 'HAS BEGUN'" (012403)
WASHINGTON TIMES.com: "CHINA SHIPS NORTH KOREA INGREDIENT FOR NUCLEAR ARMS" by Bill Gertz (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "North Korean procurement agents succeeded in buying 20 tons of tributyl phosphate, known as TBP, a key chemical used to extract material for nuclear bombs from spent nuclear fuel, said officials familiar with intelligence reports of the transfer.") (121702)
WorldNetDaily.com: "NORTH KOREA: A FUMBLED FRAMEWORK" -Commentary by Hugh Hewitt (011503)
***NEWS4COLORADO.com: "NORTH KOREA CALLS FOR 'HOLY WAR' AGAINST U.S." (January 11, 2003) - Note: url expired.
***WASHINGTON TIMES.com: "IRAQ URGES ARABS TO FOLLOW NORTH KOREA" (010203)
NewsMax.com: "NORTH KOREA NUKES CLINTON LEGACY" by Charles R. Smith (010803)
FrontPageMagazine.com (WALL STREET JOURNAL EDITORIAL): "PYONGYANG'S NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL" (010203)
USA TODAY.com (AP): "EX-SERGEANT FACES DEATH PENALTY IN SPYING CASE" (011203)
NewsMax.com: "CLINTON AND CHINESE MISSILES" by Charles R. Smith (January 14, 2003)
***BOOK: "UNRESTRICTED WARFARE: CHINA'S MASTER PLAN TO DESTROY AMERICA" by Col. Qiao Liang, Col. Wang Xiangsui, and Al Santoli
An Interesting Discussion on FREEREPUBLIC.com regarding an AP article via HERALDTRIBUNE.com: "CUPERTINO MAN ARRESTED FOR SELLING MISSILE TECHNOLOGY TO CHINA" (ARTICLE NOTE: The suspect is identified as Qing Chang Jiang aka Frank Jiang.) (January 11, 2003)
WorldNetDaily.com: "U.S. FIRMS HELPED CHINA WITH NUKES? State Accuses Hughes, Boeing of Providing Missile Technology" by Jon Dougherty (010203)
GertzFile.com
SoftWar.net
FREE CONGRESS.org - Notable News Now: "NEGLIGENCE: BILL CLINTON'S REAL LEGACY ON NATIONAL DEFENSE" -Commentary by Paul M. Weyrich (120502)
NewsMax.com: "Clinton Audio Exclusive: Pre-September 11 Bin Laden Strike Wouldn't Have Worked" (August 7, 2002)
stepping back in time....RPC.SENATE.GOV: "Clinton-Approved Iranian Arms Transfers Help Turn Bosnia Into Militant Islamic Base" (011697)
73 posted on
02/03/2003 7:16:17 PM PST by
Cindy
To: AmericanInTokyo
Nice post. Thanks.
86 posted on
02/03/2003 8:49:07 PM PST by
GOPJ
To: AmericanInTokyo
98 posted on
02/04/2003 3:45:23 AM PST by
Cindy
To: AmericanInTokyo
Wonder is S Korea is still blaming this whole thing on the USA...
101 posted on
02/04/2003 6:10:29 AM PST by
Guillermo
(Sic 'Em)
To: AmericanInTokyo
The funny thing about those two reactors for electrical power built for North Korea thanks to Clinton: there are NO transmission lines.
107 posted on
02/04/2003 7:11:19 AM PST by
aruanan
To: AmericanInTokyo
113 posted on
02/04/2003 6:11:28 PM PST by
Cindy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson