Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomer saw shuttle apparently in trouble over California
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | 02/01/03 | John Antczak

Posted on 02/01/2003 2:25:26 PM PST by socal_parrot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last
To: Born to Conserve
Will a telescope be able to track something moving that fast?

Yes, I track both the ISS and any object (with 1 meter resolution at 250 miles) that has published orbital elements with my Meade LX200 & Satellite Tracker software. On reentry the elements change too much for me .... professionals can easily track it

41 posted on 02/01/2003 3:18:52 PM PST by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
I heard the interview about noon on KOMO Seattle. He sounded extremely credible. If there was slight structural damage from it being struck on the left wing, and tiles started to come off, it well could have started over California, or even sooner.
42 posted on 02/01/2003 3:21:39 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
So like my last question.

With your math there is no way it took over 9 hours from LA to Texas.

The main report here was writen at 12:03 am. What's with the time difference?
43 posted on 02/01/2003 3:22:24 PM PST by AlabamaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: djf
Dang, I missed that interview......But I must say, his words did sound very credible......
44 posted on 02/01/2003 3:23:16 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AlabamaRebel
they put in am instead of pm is my guess a web site problem.
45 posted on 02/01/2003 3:27:49 PM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angles trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Bttt......And they will determine, without a doubt where the spacecraft started breaking up. I personally believe this guys account, given his background, etc.
46 posted on 02/01/2003 3:31:50 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: sciencediet
It is about 900 seconds from California to Texas via Space Shuttle in that time frame. There were only 900 seconds left to the flight when we lost telemetry. If the debris were small at first reentry would probably consume them. Please Pray for all the families involved there are a great many more than just the Astronauts and all who touched their lives are devastated at this time. Yet we must find the reason, fix it and go on.

Ravenstar
48 posted on 02/01/2003 3:33:45 PM PST by Ravenstar (Bring Back the Constitutional Republic -- Disband the TSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
He said he had never witnessed a shuttle re-entry before and is not an authority on shuttles, but he immediately thought Columbia was having problems.

End of discussion.

A downside of the instant information available, is that all sorts of silliness gets broadcast, like this.

49 posted on 02/01/2003 3:36:52 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USABLUE
I am sorry USABLUE but you are wrong this was not an act of terrorism. It was at 38 miles up when it began to break up. The Chi Comms would not start a war that way they are already having too much success importing all our manufacturing Business and exporting the goods to provide funds for their own nuclear program. You do not do such a thing until you have clear superiority and they are about 5 years away from equality. It would be 50 years if not for the Sick Willie previous president.

Ravenstar
50 posted on 02/01/2003 3:39:32 PM PST by Ravenstar (Bring Back the Constitutional Republic -- Disband the TSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: patriot5186
When it lands in California it has already bled off much of its speed before landing. Since it was landing it Florida this time it was still traveling very fast through the atmosphere when it passed over California - lots of friction, so lots of heat.

BTW, at the press conference it was obvious that the NASA guys thought they were talking about the observatory in Hawaii, but the Owens Valley is just over to the east side of Sierra. I think that's the Long Tom area and we feel their earthquakes here at my home sometimes. So they would have seen the shuttle after 5:53 which would have been after sensor problems so maybe he did see something that wasn't plasma. If he did actually see something it must not have been something noticed onboard because they were still in contact with the shuttle for a few more minutes.
51 posted on 02/01/2003 3:40:14 PM PST by Chesterbelloc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: don-o
No matter what, something was wrong over California and a freeper saw it on fire over Las Vegas. What ever happend, if it just keep burning on re entry but made it to Teaxs where it just exploded or something else. I don't know. But at 9:03 eastern thread time here something was already wrong.
52 posted on 02/01/2003 3:41:20 PM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angles trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: USABLUE
so you think they used a particle beam to hit the shuttle's underbelly on it's dissent at 230 thousand feet traveling fifteen times the speed of sound... and did this on their first shot? -hmmmnnn. I don't think I would buy that.

I always suspect foul play, but rather suspect an rag head sympathizer might have contaminated a few of the heat-shield-tiles prior to takeoff...

fwiw... this one did have an important military satellite, and taking out the shuttle would have been a priority BEFORE it deployed, more than it would be after...
53 posted on 02/01/2003 3:43:22 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 (clintonsgotusbytheballs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
make that at least 5 minutes before 9:03 as the poster had to post after he saw it.
54 posted on 02/01/2003 3:43:35 PM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angles trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Ravenstar
15 minutes from California to Texas? I suppose that's reasonable. What about viewing time from the ground? What was its altitude? Do we have a mathematician who can triangulate this thing and tell us how far apart two people could be and see the exact same moment in the sky?
55 posted on 02/01/2003 3:44:36 PM PST by Lady Jag (Googolplex Start Thinker of the Seventh Galaxy of Light and Ingenuity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: USABLUE
no. I'd rather blame this on them... but no... it would be beyond their ability. This was a horrible accident, not an attack.
56 posted on 02/01/2003 3:45:23 PM PST by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: don-o
As I said earlier, NASA first noticed the problem at 8:53 Eastern. The shuttle was over California at that time.
57 posted on 02/01/2003 3:45:39 PM PST by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sciencediet
My bachelors degree was Math but I really am not yet in the mood to do that calculation. At the Texas point is when I was told they were 38 miles up.

Ravenstar
58 posted on 02/01/2003 3:48:52 PM PST by Ravenstar (Bring Back the Constitutional Republic -- Disband the TSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: USABLUE
I'm trying to go with you here on this, but what did the Chicomms do? Are you saying that a report of flashes weren't created by the shuttle but rather they were flashes from a Chicomm weapon, a laser or something? Give me a little more to work with here and why you posit this...
59 posted on 02/01/2003 3:52:43 PM PST by ApesForEvolution (This space for rent (Not accepting bids from the United Nations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: USABLUE
If you survive February without being suspended or banned, I'll buy ya a beer.
60 posted on 02/01/2003 3:56:22 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson