Skip to comments.
Astronomer saw shuttle apparently in trouble over California
San Diego Union Tribune ^
| 02/01/03
| John Antczak
Posted on 02/01/2003 2:25:26 PM PST by socal_parrot
By John Antczak
ASSOCIATED PRESS
12:03 a.m., February 1, 2003
LOS ANGELES – Space shuttle Columbia appeared to begin trailing fiery debris as it passed over Eastern California early Saturday, well before its destruction over Texas, according to a California Institute of Technology astronomer who witnessed its fiery transit.
Anthony Beasley observed the shuttle's re-entry from outside his home in Bishop, Calif., near Caltech's Owens Valley Radio Observatory, where he is project manager of the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy.
"As it tracked from west to east over the Owens Valley it was leaving a bright trail. As it actually moved over the valley there were a couple of flashes. ... Then we could see there were things clearly trailing the orbiter subsequent to that," Beasley said.
Beasley said he, his wife, Anne, and mother-in-law, Anne Finley, had gone outside in the early morning darkness to watch the re-entry from the small town 225 miles north of Los Angeles. He said the sky was clear and dark, and the shuttle was immediately visible when it cleared the Sierra Nevada peaks to the west of Bishop.
He said he had never witnessed a shuttle re-entry before and is not an authority on shuttles, but he immediately thought Columbia was having problems.
"In particular, there was one very clear event where there was a piece that backed off the orbiter. ... It was giving off its own light, then it slowly fell from visibility," he said.
Beasley said he thought the shuttle might be losing some of the heat-resistant tiles that protect it during the fiery re-entry. He said he did not learn of the shuttle's destruction until he went to the observatory and compared notes with two news photographers who had arranged to photograph the re-entry through a telescope.
Beasley said they compared notes and all agreed they had seen what he termed "the bright event, the third event."
"The analogy, I think, is it looked like the shuttle dropped a flare," he said.
He described the scene again: "Pretty soon after we started to see it track there were brief flashes of light. It would sort of flash a little bit and there was an indication of material trailing the orbiter. They would sort of disappear from view. ... That happened two or three times. One of these was very bright. It was a very clear thing. It separated itself from where the orbiter is. It sort of fell behind in the trail and it was burning itself. It was hot itself ... and then the orbiter continued heading toward Texas."
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: columbia; columbiatragedy; feb12003; nasa; spaceshuttle; sts107
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-304 next last
To: Dog Gone
>If I got the sequence right from the NASA conference,
>there weren't any sensor problems until the Shuttle was >over Texas.
The shuttle is moving very fast. When they had the first sensor problem at 5:53 the shuttle was just north of San Francisco. From there it moved south of Lake Tahoe and was in Texas just a few minutes later. The schedule that I have had it actually touching down on the runway in Florida at 6:15:50 PST.
To: cgbg
22
posted on
02/01/2003 2:44:06 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angles trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: sciencediet
Judging from this live
thread of FReepers watching the shuttle pass overhead, it took less than 10 minutes to get from California to Texas. The shuttle first noticed trouble at 8:53 Eastern time, the shuttle flew over San Francisco between 8:51 and 8:55 Eastern time.
To: Dog Gone
I wonder if there could have been a meteor hit the shuttle ---I saw a large meteor sometime during the night that streaked quite far down.
24
posted on
02/01/2003 2:47:03 PM PST
by
FITZ
To: TLBSHOW
That is a chilling thread.
To: sciencediet
...trailing fiery debris as it passed over Eastern California early Saturday, well before its destruction over Texas... I have a problem with this sentence. When you're going 20 times the speed of sound, going between California and Texas takes no time at all.
To: socal_parrot
That thread is history of this tragedy in live time as it happend. From my travelers on the net since I find no one else with this information. Add this account from Cal and the problem looks to me to of started way before Texas. Like it was on fire as it came in.
27
posted on
02/01/2003 2:50:50 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angles trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: jwfiv; TLBSHOW
oops
I meant to say that it looks to me like the shuttle is glowing when the video begins, and then an intial explosion that changes the trail from vapor to smoke as it begins to burn, then the spin and real fire commences.
Hell, what do I know? I'm just shook up and trying to make sense of what I see.
That the astronauts' experience from beginning to their sudden end might only have been a few seconds gives me absolutely no comfort at all.
Bummin' here, big time...(
28
posted on
02/01/2003 2:51:12 PM PST
by
jwfiv
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
It must take mere seconds for the shuttle to pass from CA to TX and its altitude should allow millions a view. At that altitude a good portion of the globe was in their view.
29
posted on
02/01/2003 2:52:28 PM PST
by
Lady Jag
(Googolplex Start Thinker of the Seventh Galaxy of Light and Ingenuity)
To: jwfiv
That is so poignantly written.
30
posted on
02/01/2003 2:55:49 PM PST
by
ChemistCat
(We should have had newer, safer, better, more efficient ships by now, damn it.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The shuttle was traveling 200 miles a minute, 3.3 miles a second over Texas. It was traveling 280 miles a minute, 4.7 miles a second at initial de-orbit. First rrouble with sensors was first noticed at least 1400 miles before loss of com.
31
posted on
02/01/2003 2:56:17 PM PST
by
jlogajan
To: Dog
Thanks dog, just found this.......
To: Cicero
This sounds like a pretty good witness.I agree, sounds pretty credible.
To: jlogajan
The shuttle was traveling 200 miles a minute, 3.3 miles a second over Texas. It was traveling 280 miles a minute, 4.7 miles a second at initial de-orbit. First rrouble with sensors was first noticed at least 1400 miles before loss of com. Wouldn't that put it over the coastal area of central California? Or further inland or east, like the Sierras?
To: Keith in Iowa
They said during the NASA press conference that most likely what was seen over California is plasma, not shuttle parts. And "they" also said that no one could possibly have seen missile contrials leading up to Flight 800...or no one could possibly have seen an explosion before the tail fell off of the flight that crashed in a New York neighborhood...
Just pointing out some previous "expert" poo pooing.
To: Chesterbelloc
I used to work at Edwards AFB and have witnessed a number of shuttle landings and I've never seen it as a fireball!
Every time I've seen it it was a white dot in the sky that fell like a rock and glided to a perfect landing.
I wonder if they were having problems over CA and you witnessed it?
To: sciencediet
I saw posted and heard on the radio the shuttle was going about 12,500mph when it got into trouble.
12,500 / 60 = 208 miles per minute
208 / 60 = 3.47 miles per second
It is about 1500 miles from LA to Dallas.
1500 / 3.47 = 432 seconds
432 / 60 = 7.2 minutes to go from LA to Dallas. Lots of assumptions here and I hope my math is correct.
37
posted on
02/01/2003 3:13:55 PM PST
by
upchuck
(Prayer: †††††††)
To: ChemistCat
It's that kind of day...(
38
posted on
02/01/2003 3:13:57 PM PST
by
jwfiv
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
When you're going 20 times the speed of sound, going between California and Texas takes no time at all.That's exactly why I tend to believe this story...Or the observers credibility.....
To: All
Just wondering. Where is ASSOCIATED PRESS based at,
and why is this report timed at: 12:03 a.m., February 1, 2003
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-304 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson