Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o
As I said earlier, NASA first noticed the problem at 8:53 Eastern. The shuttle was over California at that time.
57 posted on 02/01/2003 3:45:39 PM PST by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: socal_parrot
You are correct.

They began to notice that sensors were giving unusual readings. Could a ground observer noted that?

62 posted on 02/01/2003 4:14:07 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: socal_parrot
As I said earlier, NASA first noticed the problem at 8:53 Eastern. The shuttle was over California at that time.

I would tend to agree with this. The will determine almost exactly where it was, and soon when the event first started.

66 posted on 02/01/2003 4:20:53 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: socal_parrot
NASA first noticed the problem at 8:53 Eastern. The shuttle was over California at that time

Yup.

I think NASA was doing a little "shading" in their press conference when it probably was not necessary.

Questions that were not asked and that they didn't want asked were:

Have these sensors ever failed in re-entry before?

When the sensors started to fail did it occur to anyone there that they might have a thermal event on their hands?

It may be that NASA had gotten a little complacent about re-entry after so many (100+) successful reentrys and didn't understand the problem for quite a few minutes.

But all that really is academic, because if the shuttle is in atmosphere reentry it is little more than a runaway rock and there is not a whole lot anybody can do if there is a major problem. :-(
73 posted on 02/01/2003 4:46:44 PM PST by cgbg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson