Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Clinton explains Iraq strike
CNN.com ^ | 12-16-98

Posted on 01/30/2003 2:47:48 AM PST by Gillmeister

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:00 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Ah, the joys of news archives.......it always seems to come back and haunt you!
1 posted on 01/30/2003 2:47:48 AM PST by Gillmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
Yes Indeed!

The Democrats' Case Against Saddam Hussein (Dems nailed, yet again)

Headline Rundown and links on Iraq - Things the democrats have conviently forgot...

Saddam Abused His Last Chance, Clinton -clear and present danger to safety of people everywhere 1998

Gore repeats that Saddam MUST GO - June 2000

What the democrats want you to forget

Iraq is a Regional Threat, capable of as much as 200 tons of VX nerve agent (1999 Clinton report)

Czech military reports say iraq has smallpox virus in weapons stockpile (and camelpox)

2/7/1998 : Arab media: Clinton will strike due to sex scandal (&links to tons of arab news on clinton)

Iraqi chemical weapons buildup reported (Sept 2001 Report)

Clinton, Gore rally domestic support for strike at Iraq, "unholy axis" (1998 Must read)

statement President Clinton from 1998 on the air strikes

Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 - Full Text, Sense of Congress - Remove Saddam

2 posted on 01/30/2003 2:53:03 AM PST by chance33_98 (Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
Thank you Mr. president.
3 posted on 01/30/2003 2:54:00 AM PST by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
...So Iraq has abused its final chance.

I wish I got as many final chances as Buttboy Saddam gets.

4 posted on 01/30/2003 3:07:14 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
Great catch!
5 posted on 01/30/2003 3:08:27 AM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
I like the reference to "last chance". It certainly puts the Dems in their place doesn't it! LOL, their own guy said it was Hussein's last chance over four years ago.

As for the rest...

Hisssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss. What an empty suit.

6 posted on 01/30/2003 3:13:25 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
In short, the inspectors are saying that even if they could stay in Iraq, their work would be a sham.

...

So Iraq has abused its final chance...

The current inspectors are in effect saying, "Even though our efforts are a sham, we'd like to continue this sham for many more months." And WRT Saddams' "final chance" - I think we know that coming from Clinton's mouth, it all depends how you define "final"...

7 posted on 01/30/2003 4:14:53 AM PST by Publius Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
Well I'll be gol-darned. There isn't a single reference to that woman, not one time, not never in that speech. Lucky for ol' Billy that Saddam just decided to become a danger right then--and just before Ramadan, too.
8 posted on 01/30/2003 4:23:07 AM PST by Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mason
Nor is there a single reference to Democrats demanding a smoking gun.
9 posted on 01/30/2003 4:34:02 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
Clinton's bombing of Iraq was the day of the impeachment vote -- deliberately timed to delay the proceedings.

Does anyoneone know where I can find an article in which the Dems express their outrage that the impeachment vote was going on while our troops were going into harm's way?

I remember quite a lot of Dem squealing about that.
10 posted on 01/30/2003 4:34:53 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
But...But....your WIFE and her minions are saying that Saddam has NO Nuclear, BIO or Chemical Weapons!!!! So WHY did you bomb that innocent Saddam and make a PRE-EMPTIVE strike against him???

|PLEASE POST THAT SENTENCE EVERY DAY!!!!!

11 posted on 01/30/2003 4:38:56 AM PST by Claire Voyant ((visualize whirled peas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
bump
12 posted on 01/30/2003 4:47:40 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (Let's Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
I'm so grateful that it has been so long since I've had to listen to a Clinton speech, however upon reading it there is a striking contrast between a Bush speech and this one. Clinton is obsessed with the word "I" whereas Bush tends to use the royal "we"s and "our"s. The significance could be argued several ways, I guess, but it struck me nonetheless.
13 posted on 01/30/2003 4:52:35 AM PST by Lil'freeper (I amar prestar aen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
Great Find Bump!
14 posted on 01/30/2003 5:21:05 AM PST by Sungirl (Clinton sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Here's one for you:

"Even so, Democrats pressed for more restraint by the majority. House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) said Republicans should put off impeachment until all military action has ended. "It shouldn't come up as long as our troops are in harm's way," he said."

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/impeach121798.htm

15 posted on 01/30/2003 5:38:57 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
Isn't this when he bombed the asprin factory?
16 posted on 01/30/2003 6:06:15 AM PST by Sungirl (Clinton sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
I was just about to blast CNN for "President Clinton" title until I see this is an archived post, lol!
17 posted on 01/30/2003 6:24:02 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
bookmark bump
18 posted on 01/30/2003 8:06:59 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them.

Do the dems remember this?

19 posted on 01/30/2003 8:39:04 AM PST by b4its2late (Keep your weapons and your clothes (in that order) where you can find them in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
Should send this to Teddy Kennedy.
20 posted on 01/30/2003 8:43:46 AM PST by b4its2late (Keep your weapons and your clothes (in that order) where you can find them in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson