Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daschle's lowest blow: Hugh Hewitt excoriates Democrat leader for undermining president, U.S.
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, January 29, 2003 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 01/29/2003 1:29:42 AM PST by JohnHuang2

Tom Daschle's attack on President Bush's Iraq policy on the eve of war and long after the Congress had voted to authorize the president to launch the war was shocking and without precedent. A hundred years from now, it will be remembered as an act of complete political selfishness and a low point in American politics.

There is simply no parallel in American history for Daschle's web of half-truths, wild charges and bitter recriminations. He is the leader of the Democrats and his party, which cowered from such charges before the election and now embraces and popularizes them. Daschle delivered his remarks on the very day that even a U.N. bureaucrat like Hans Blix was obliged to concede that Saddam was not complying with the U.N.'s demands, and on the day that even the softest of the European states had begun to harden. Tom Daschle revealed himself as the very last appeaser. The damage he did to the national interest may have been immense.

Any hope that Saddam might spare the world this war and bolt for safer ground in Libya or elsewhere was significantly undermined by the spectacle of the leader of the nation's opposition challenging the president's veracity. One can only wonder what might have happened had Daschle and his European allies presented the tyrant with a united front. It is easy to see, however, how Saddam might wrongly conclude that Bush could not possibly proceed in the face of such opposition. Thank you, Sen. Daschle, for helping destroy the possibility of forcing Saddam from power without the now inevitable clash of armies.

Spouses, children, parents and friends of America's soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines have every right to be outraged. Either Daschle's bitterness at November's result has blinded him, or he truly is the most limited of America's recent political leadership figures. The carping about tax policy and the thread-bare rhetoric about class warfare are hardly offensive – just amusing and predictable. Opposition to war in the fall could even have been thought honorable, though wrong-headed. But Monday's display was just mendacious, a low moment in the career of a limited man.

Bush's speech will quickly eclipse Daschle's duplicity, which is unfortunate. I would like for every American to hear the minority leader's Monday speech played again and again. And after the liberation of Iraq, I would like for his remarks to be played not just here but for the people of Iraq. I expect that even their relief at liberation from Saddam's despotism could not conceal their anger with Daschle and his ilk.

"The Pianist" is currently in theaters, a moving story of one man's struggle to survive Hitler's killing fever. There are millions in Iraq this very day desperate for the arrival of a liberating force, whether comprised just of Americans, of Americans and troops from its score of allies, or from even a reluctant coalition of U.N. participants. The horrors these troops uncover will shock – but they will not surprise! We know what we will find – all of us do, including Tom Daschle. On Monday, Tom Daschle urged that the public disregard all of the president's many arguments about Saddam's dangers. Daschle urged that the public ignore the great number of allies we have already assembled to join us in the war. And he urged that the public even ignore his own vote and the votes of his colleagues from only months ago.

Tom Daschle also urged that we ignore the people of Iraq, the persecuted and the imprisoned. He did so just as their collective hope of liberation was beginning to mature. He did so despite the facts already in evidence and despite the facts the vast majority of responsible foreign-policy experts believe to exist outside of the published record. He did so despite the risk Iraq poses to its neighbors. And he did so despite the desperate condition of an oppressed and tortured people. It was a craven act by a man unbalanced in his political calculations by the weight of frustrated ambition.

Democrats might someday regain majority status in one or both houses of Congress, and they might regain the presidency. But if there is any justice in the world and any sense of honor in the country, the Democrats who stood by silently this week and are thus complicit in Daschle's attack will never be rewarded with the public's trust again.


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
Wednesday, January 29, 2003

Quote of the Day by Theophilus

1 posted on 01/29/2003 1:29:42 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..

Hugh Hewitt MEGA PING!!


2 posted on 01/29/2003 1:33:42 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A great quote that needs to be 'sent round the world'. . .
3 posted on 01/29/2003 1:46:18 AM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket
The Democrats only want to score political cheap shots against the President, fully ignoring the dangers facing this country. The Daschle and his party represent an entirely different breed of opposition from what we've been used to. Apparently its lost on them we can't afford to wait for something worse than 9-11. The sooner Saddam is neutralized the better we will all sleep in our beds at night. Let the Senate Minority Leader mull it over before he tries to undermine our President at exactly the time when if anything, in our foreign affairs, its imperative for the United States to present a united front.
4 posted on 01/29/2003 2:07:15 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Amen. You put it perfectly!
5 posted on 01/29/2003 2:11:59 AM PST by EternalVigilance (abort NARAL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Darsehole.
6 posted on 01/29/2003 2:16:07 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A hundred years from now, it will be remembered as an act of complete political selfishness and a low point in American politics.

No, a year from now it will be forgotten.

7 posted on 01/29/2003 2:19:05 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A hundred years from now, it will be remembered as an act of complete political selfishness and a low point in American politics.

Or in a hundred years from now the Politburo in DC will select Tom as one of the "People's Hero's" and have Christian slave labor build him a monument where the status of Lincoln used to be.

Unless we drive the Socialists into the ocean in the short term, I fear for the future our children will inherit.

8 posted on 01/29/2003 2:21:55 AM PST by Caipirabob ([Formerly: Yakboy] Democrat.. Socialist..Commie..Traitor...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Great strategy by the Democrats; just terrific.

Whenever your Party gets their butts whipped in an election, it's obvious that the best thing to do is to elect a hyper-liberal SF feminist ball-buster as your leader in the House and then have your Congressional membership stoop to a childish pettiness that is simply breathtaking.

I hope they keep it up. I really, really do.

9 posted on 01/29/2003 2:29:21 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

The Blix Report; Nancy and Tommy go bananas

After Monday's interim "progress" report on wonderful Iraqi "compliance", the only conclusion one can draw is that Iraq -- and Democrat backers -- have rather curious ways of defining "cooperation." Maybe Saddam, like his playmate Clinton on the meaning of "is", reserves unique definition for words.

We hear ad nauseam that the President has 'failed to make his case.' That Saddam is, like Osama Mama Murray says of her darling namesake, really just the kindest, sweetest, gentlest lil' dictator you'll ever know. Don't believe me? Just ask the Kurds.

Saddam is, say Democrats, allowing the inspections process to move forward, so why can't bully Bush?

But is Saddam really cooperating, as Democrats assert?

Gee, let's see:

-- Iraq, says chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix, hasn't "come to a genuine acceptance, not even today, of the disarmament that was demanded of it." The 12,000-page weapons report was a sham, a web of falsehoods and omissions, "a reprint of earlier documents," he said. They don't "seem to contain any new evidence that will eliminate the questions or reduce their number," he added.

-- Iraq's "cooperation" on process is a fig-leaf. Saddam still offers nothing on substance. "It is not enough to open doors," Blix told the U.N. Security Council Monday, adding that "inspections is not a game of catch-as-catch-can. Rather ... it is a process of verification for the purpose of creating confidence."

-- Anthrax? "There are strong indications," said Blix, "that Iraq produced more anthrax than it declared and that at least some of this was retained after the declared destruction date."

-- On Iraqi assertions that remaining supplies of deadly VX nerve agent were destroyed after Desert Storm, Blix says the U.N. "has information that conflicts with this account."

-- A Mustard gas precursor had been uncovered.

-- Iraq has thus far failed to produced scientists for private interviews. Kinda strange if, as Saddam claims, he's got nothing to hide. Blix noted, moreover, that U.N. inspectors have also been targets of Iraqi harassment and intimidation.

-- Thousands of chemical warfare bombs have not been accounted for.

-- Construction of missiles with ranges beyond the 90-mile limit imposed by U.N. resolutions continues.

-- Iraq has refused repeated requests by inspectors to deploy a U-2 surveillance plane.

No 'smoking gun', granted, just freight-loads of semen-stained dresses with Butcher-of-Baghdad's DNA all over 'em.

No amount of proof will, of course, ever convince the 'With-Our-Souls-And-Our-Blood-We-Sacrifice-To-You, Oh-Saddam!' Democrats, who everyday sound more and more like Tariq Aziz.

Democrats want Bush -- not Saddam -- to be the issue here.

Some are even upbeat Saddam will beat the rap.

Iraq has had more than enough time to comply, says the U.S.

No way, say Democrats. Bush isn't being fair. Disarming is a big job, time-consuming -- not something a dictator can do lickety-split. Between torturing and hanging opponents, extracting confessions, running detention camps, chopping hands off, kidnapping, training terrorists -- c'mon, where's Saddam suppose to find the time? The Butcher is a busy guy. It's not like sonny boy Uday can handle the workload alone, you know.

Iraq, of course, denies there's any torture and killing going on. Okay, maybe just a little. Hey, it's not our fault, you see. If we torture and kill people, the U.N. embargo made us do it, they say.

Follow the "logic" here:

-- Inspections have failed, so we need more of 'em.

-- U.N. resolution 1441 calls on Iraq to comply fully. Saddam's reply? The middle-finger salute. The French Vichy wannabes and the German Nazi wannabes call this "progress" -- hey, he could've launched chem or bio weapons that he doesn't have on Israel, right? Besides, anyone who hates Americans and Jews like Saddam can't be all that bad.

-- Saddam would've willingly allowed inspectors back in -- Bush's threatened use of force, backed by large-scale U.S.-British troop deployments to the region, has had nothing to do with it.

Democrats argue that the world will be a lot less safe without Saddam in power because if we remove Saddam from power the Arab world will get really, really mad at us even though they were really, really mad at us even before 9/11 which is why 9/11 occurred and Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 and even if he did Bush has not made the case that he did therefore it didn't really happen....

Confused yet?

As I noted several months ago, Democrats are in 'Defend-Saddam-At-All-Costs' mode, eerily similar to 'Defend-Clinton-At-All-Costs during the Monica mess.

Nothing Saddam has done, say Democrats, rises to the level of removal from office/Nothing Clinton did rose to the level of impeachment and removal from office.

Sure Saddam lied to weapons inspectors, but so what? All politicians lie/Sure Clinton lied to Ken Starr but so what? All men lie about their sex life.

Sure Saddam violates human rights, but so what? So do Iran and Syria and China/Sure Clinton had sex with Monica, but so what? All men do it.

Sure the Blix report was pretty scathing, but so what? Where's the 'smoking gun'?/Sure the Starr report was pretty scathing, but so what? Where's the 'smoking gun'?

Interestingly, Democrat leaders Monday rallied around Saddam in much the same way Democrats rallied around Clinton at the Rose Garden after impeachment.

Where's the proof? demanded Tommy Daschle and Rep. Nancy Pelosi.

Appearing jointly at the National Press Club in a "pre-buttal" to the President's Tuesday Address, Tommy and Nancy sought to undermine Bush, insinuating the White House lacks evidence to back up its claims that Saddam possesses weapons of mass destruction.

If you have the proof, let's see it, they said.

The onus is not on Saddam, but on Bush.

Hanoi Jane had nothing on Nancy and Tommy.

Anyway, that's..

My two cents..
"JohnHuang2"


10 posted on 01/29/2003 2:31:45 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good article. The demoncRATs are a threat to American freedom and liberty.
11 posted on 01/29/2003 2:35:10 AM PST by twntaipan (Defend American Liberty: Defeat a demoncRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Hugh Hewitt is Right!! Tommie D'asshole is an anti-American, PRO-Tyranny DOLT...and his political career is rapidly coming to an end, IMHO!!

FReegards...MUD

12 posted on 01/29/2003 2:56:10 AM PST by Mudboy Slim (Tommie D'Asshole is an anti-American, PRO-Tyranny TRAITOR to America!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; madfly; FITZ; Bill Davis FR; mhking; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; Elkiejg; barker; ...
Dont wanna miss this pings.
13 posted on 01/29/2003 3:11:07 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (The Fellowship of Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Show them you support the Prez
VOTE NOW
HERE
HERE
HERE
HERE
HERE
HERE
HERE
14 posted on 01/29/2003 3:23:14 AM PST by wewillnotfail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices; .45MAN; ABG(anybody but Gore); acnielsen guy; aeronca; Angelwood; AnnaZ; ...
Tom Daschle's attack on President Bush's Iraq policy on the eve of war and long after the Congress had voted to authorize the president to launch the war was shocking and without precedent. A hundred years from now, it will be remembered as an act of complete political selfishness and a low point in American politics.

Daschle ping!

-------------------------------------------------------------

(Please Freepmail me if you want on/off my Daschle ping.)

15 posted on 01/29/2003 3:27:07 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Just another symptom of the Clinton Political Idealogy, so firmly im"bed"ed in the Democratic Party. Shrill crys and lies - as opposed to true opposition.
16 posted on 01/29/2003 3:39:36 AM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

"Let them laugh. We still have 900 stolen FBI files and control of the IRS."

17 posted on 01/29/2003 3:42:24 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Get over it, Tommy. We already know you are a major


18 posted on 01/29/2003 3:53:18 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"A hundred years from now, it will be remembered as an act of complete political selfishness and a low point in American politics."

Yep...and Tommie D'A$$HOLE will be Permanently Outta ElectedPolitics two (2) years from today, IMHO...MUD

19 posted on 01/29/2003 3:55:47 AM PST by Mudboy Slim (2003's Gonna Be a GREAT YEAR!!...SITYS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Hey nic, replace the word "Lib'ral" with the word "D'A$$HOLE" and it works just as well.....

"Lib'rals!!"
(To be sung to the Rolling Stones' "Angie")

Lib'rals...my FRiends...
When will yer hatred disappear?!
Leftists...my bro's...
Help tell Dem zealots, "NEVER HERE!!"
With good intents in their souls...
IGNORANT FOOLS...EVIL Goals!!
Please explain why Clinton Lied!!

But Lib'rals...my FRiends...
'Tis fer FReedom that FReepers Fight!!

Lib'rals...are ignorant...yeah...
Minion DOLTS...put HATE aside!!
Lib'rals...we'll still love ya...
MLK ain't fer gen-o-cide!!
All Left's dreams they were so close...
But they all went up in smoke!!
Let me whisper in Slick's ear,
"Osama...bil Clinton...YOU SHALL BE DETHRONED THIS YEAR!!!"

(Haunting keyboard solo)

So...daughters, gently sleep...
Fer yer futures, Right does FReep!!
Avenge Slick Willie's shameless crimes!!
And soldiers...Our Sons, please just know that "WE ARE RIGHT!!"

'Cuz there's lovin' in our souls...
And there's Honor in our goals!!
Fer yer FReedom we shall fight!!
'Cuz Lib'rals...FReepers love ya, baby...
Everywhere Left looks, they'll fear our Might!!
We won't let DemonRATS git their claws in you...
C'mon FReepers, Join OUR Fight!!
Lib'rals...Dimwits...ain't it good to be alive?!
Sosh'lists...my FRiends...you can't say MUD never tried...

Revised today...MUD

15 posted on 11/16/2002 7:01 AM EST by Mudboy Slim

RATS're Dolts and FReepers Must Educate Dems...MUD

20 posted on 01/29/2003 4:02:57 AM PST by Mudboy Slim (2003's Gonna Be a GREAT YEAR!!...SITYS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson