Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shame On Hillary? Oh, Forget It, She Doesn't Have Any Shame!
Toogood Reports ^ | January 27, 2003 | Paul E. Scate

Posted on 01/27/2003 1:34:54 PM PST by Stand Watch Listen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2003 1:34:54 PM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
But we already knew this. Unfortunately there are others who will vote for the Democrat no matter who it is. I never thought she would be elected- - -even by the voters of New York, but....go figure. She and her disgusting husband just won't go away.
2 posted on 01/27/2003 1:41:51 PM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I done been sayin' this and sayin' this same thing for years now....

Hillary's all they've got...and way to many will fall for her. That's why it is critical that we ALWAYS, and LOUDLY, and CLEARLY expose the left.

3 posted on 01/27/2003 1:42:35 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Today I called her office, was put directly to a comment line as office was closed, and let my honest opinion of the way the clinton administration ignored Osama and thusly allowed the architect of 9/11 to pull off his deadly stunt. I demanded that she reconsider ever speaking up on national security unless, perhaps, she wanted middle American moms like myself to promote loudly and clearly the direct impact she and her sick husband had on 9/11. I said, this time, accusing your enemies of YOUR OWN MISTAKES was NOT going to WORK. That we are here, we are watching and we are not going to take her blabbering sitting down. I finished with asking her very politely to ask her husband to SHUT UP and start respecting ex-presidential protocol. Reminding her that she and her husband had doen quite enough to trash our culture, thank you very much.
4 posted on 01/27/2003 1:43:27 PM PST by Republic (Huck nailed it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Following the Democrat Party line, Mrs. Clinton...

She IS the Democratic party line.

5 posted on 01/27/2003 1:43:55 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
An Interesting Discussion on FREEREPUBLIC.com regarding a NEWSMAX.com article by Charles R. Smith: "SENATOR CLINTON A THREAT TO U.S. SECURITY" (012303)

6 posted on 01/27/2003 1:46:16 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

7 posted on 01/27/2003 1:50:02 PM PST by SerpentDove (What's this here thang do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Related data from RNC
THE MYTH BEHIND HILLARY CLINTON’S HOMELAND INSECURITY
Source: Republican National Committee; Published: 27 January 2003; Author: RNC Research Group

8 posted on 01/27/2003 1:52:53 PM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Here'a an email I got recently:

After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S.! sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 3,000 people in New York and Washington, D.C. that are now dead would be alive today.

AN INTERESTING QUESTION:

This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without casting stones, it is a legitimate question. There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap software and gives billions of dollars to charity. The other sponsors terrorism.

That being the case, why is it that the Clinton Administration spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the past eight years than Osama bin Laden?

THINK ABOUT IT!

It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 million for her forthcoming memoir. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir yet to be written. This from two people who have spent the past 8 years being unable to recall anything about past events while under oath!

Sincerely,

Cdr. Hamilton McWhorter USN (ret)

9 posted on 01/27/2003 1:54:41 PM PST by Andonius_99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic
May I be the first to thank you for your patriotic action.
10 posted on 01/27/2003 1:55:22 PM PST by anniegetyourgun (Silly lib/dems.....tricks are for Saddams.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Andonius_99
Says it all, doesn't it ?
11 posted on 01/27/2003 1:57:35 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
In BClinton's defense, he did lob those missles into Afghanistan---and took out that terrorist camel. To this day, we have not had any more terrorist attacks--from terrorist camels. Now, as for towel-head terrorist, well, that's a different issue--that BC chose to ignore. After all, he was too busy saving the world from terrorist camels and lobing his missle elsewhere.
12 posted on 01/27/2003 1:59:14 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Not to be rude, but when has Keyes shown great leadership ability? He's a great orator and an excellent communicator with clear views. But when has he ever lead people politically?
13 posted on 01/27/2003 2:07:40 PM PST by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanz
Queen HildaRat, the only thing your husband could hit was the sink! Next time we need a pathetically dysfunctional family in the White House we'll give you or the Osborns a call.

Pray for GW and the Troops

14 posted on 01/27/2003 2:11:43 PM PST by bray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Democrats like to talk a great deal about the so called separation of church and state and yet they seem to like the idea of having a preacher such as Je$$e Jack$on or Al Sharpton in the White House. Doesn’t make sense.
15 posted on 01/27/2003 2:45:11 PM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanz
The disgusting part is that many people, who claim to be God-fearing Christians who are against abortion, homosexuality, etc., will vote for them anyway. The average Democrat voter is an idiot.
16 posted on 01/27/2003 2:56:24 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flashman_at_the_charge
They also don't mind Lieberman invoking God every other second of his day.

However, just let George W. even mention the name Jesus in a favorable light and watch out.

17 posted on 01/27/2003 2:58:47 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Pee Wee was...uhh...too busy to do anything on his watch.


18 posted on 01/27/2003 3:01:35 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
When I sat at the Lazio phone banks, I spoke with countless Democrats who didn't even know who the Democrat candidate for the senate was, but they told me they were going to "vote for the Democrat." Just plain stupid sheep. There ought to be voter I.Q. tests.
19 posted on 01/27/2003 3:05:47 PM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stanz
I once overheard a doddering old fart in a restaurant state that the Republican Party was made up of, and the party of, homosexuals.
20 posted on 01/27/2003 3:11:36 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson