Skip to comments.
Blix says Iraq refusing U2 spy flights
HA'ARETZ ^
| January 20th, 2003
Posted on 01/20/2003 12:23:06 PM PST by Mossad1967
Top UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said on Monday Iraq had refused to allow reconnaissance flights by U2 aircraft over its territory to aid inspectors in their search for any weapons of mass destruction...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: Blood of Tyrants
Who really needs the U2 when we have satellites? Good question, but anything you can see from 200 miles you can see ten times better from 20 miles.
21
posted on
01/20/2003 12:35:50 PM PST
by
js1138
To: savedbygrace
:-) :-)
To: ClearCase_guy
SR-71 is retired. U-2 is much cheaper to fly.
23
posted on
01/20/2003 12:37:00 PM PST
by
js1138
To: justshe
24
posted on
01/20/2003 12:37:10 PM PST
by
glock rocks
(remember, only you can prevent fundraisers)
To: justshe
My sentiments exactly! The UN with France, Germany, and Russia are no more than a puppet of Sadaam from what I heard today.
Didn't trust the Russians when the Cold War ended and I still don't!
25
posted on
01/20/2003 12:37:59 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: Mossad1967
This could really get in the way of our attack plans. What if Iraq refuses to allow our troops to enter the country. How will we ever be able to attack?
26
posted on
01/20/2003 12:38:01 PM PST
by
savedbygrace
(Jesus is Lord)
To: js1138
Also, satellites fly predictable schedules. U2s do not.
Surprize! Look up. Smile for the Birdie!
27
posted on
01/20/2003 12:38:31 PM PST
by
MindBender26
(.....and for more news as it happens...stay tuned to your local FReeper station....)
To: ClearCase_guy
Top UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said on TUESDAY Iraq had refused to allow.....
Top UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said on Wednesday Iraq had refused to allow .....
and on and on and on we will go until the US and Britain get their military build up finished....
To: js1138
SR-71 is retired. U-2 is much cheaper to fly.And they'll never see Aurora!
To: lexington minuteman 1775
That is a breach isnt it? In plain English, yes. In Euro-trash diplomatic double-speak, of course it isn't! It's just another opportunity to prolong the inspections regime. After all, the mere fact that they are talking about not complying is a good sign that they will talk about it in the future.
To: RoughDobermann
LLOL.
31
posted on
01/20/2003 12:39:16 PM PST
by
savedbygrace
(Jesus is Lord)
To: RoughDobermann
And then there is Pumpkin Seed.........
32
posted on
01/20/2003 12:40:14 PM PST
by
MindBender26
(.....and for more news as it happens...stay tuned to your local FReeper station....)
To: Mossad1967
THAT'S OKAY...WE'LL JUST USE B-52 FLIGHTS NEXT. BUH BYE!
33
posted on
01/20/2003 12:40:22 PM PST
by
Puppage
To: Blood of Tyrants
Countries in the Middle East and other areas of the world are very good at timing when our satellites are over their areas to disguise what they are doing! U-2's are not only closer but they have no idea when they will fly over their country so Iraq cannot be hiding what they are doing from the U-2's.
34
posted on
01/20/2003 12:40:47 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: Blood of Tyrants
That's easy--Satellites are not provocative--Highly publicized U-2 flights are.
35
posted on
01/20/2003 12:40:52 PM PST
by
VMI70
To: PhiKapMom
Are we keeping a scorecard of how many things Iraq won't permit? According to Sec'y Powell, it is not the job of the inspectors to find these weapons and weapon components. Iraq's responsibility is to dig out the weapons and weapon components and let the inspectors verify the destruction of the weapons and weapon components. That is, if Iraq does not participate actively rather than passively, the inspection and disarmament will be done by force.
To: js1138
The U2 type imagery is releaseable...the US even gives the stuff to the forestry service when they ask. The type of technology it uses is basically 1950s...although updated. As for satellites...the preferred method...its not always releaseable. The US has no intention of releasing this capability out to the public. One added benifit of the U2 is that it can utilize some commerical type equipment and pick up items with a lot of heat generated (mainly SCUDS), and the Iraqis know this...so they would perfer not to have to admit that they actually have a lot of SCUDS just laying out in the desert.
To: VMI70
That's easy--Satellites are not provocative--Highly publicized U-2 flights are. Satellites are provocative. I believe that early on, the Soviets and the States made an agreement not to try shooting down each other's spy satellites. I believe they agreed they gave each side just enough information to spot a major buildup, without giving away details.
I don't think there was ever a formal international agreement.
38
posted on
01/20/2003 12:46:18 PM PST
by
js1138
To: Mossad1967
This is such total bullsh*t. It's time to stop playing patty-cake with the UN and get the show on the road already. Enough is enough and every day that passes without action is another day Saddam has to strike the first blow (I'm amazed it hasn't happened already). If we don't get the show on the road within days after the Jan. 27th UN report then I wouldn't be suprised if the whole shebang gets scuttled altogether.
To: RightWhale
Exactly! All I keep hearing by the less then honest news media with a few exceptions is what Sadaam won't permit. Rush had a great commentary on today about Bob Schieffer's interview with SoS Powell. Schieffer obviously didn't get it or refused to admit it that it was Iraq's responsiblity to get this weapons destroyed not the UN's to find!
40
posted on
01/20/2003 12:46:59 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-160 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson