Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Book claims Chinese discovered America
UPI ^ | Published 1/7/2003 11:49 AM | By FREDERICK M. WINSHIP

Posted on 01/11/2003 2:01:33 PM PST by vannrox

Book claims Chinese discovered America

By FREDERICK M. WINSHIP

From the

Life & Mind

Desk

Published 1/7/2003 11:49 AM

NEW YORK, Jan. 7 (UPI) -- Scattered evidence that Chinese explorers "discovered" America 71 years before Christopher Columbus and circumnavigated the earth 60 years before Ferdinand Magellan was born has been brought into convincing focus by a book published Tuesday that is expected to rewrite history.

British author Gavin Menzies first aired his theory of pre-Columbian visits by the Chinese to both North and South America in a lecture before the Royal Geographic Society in London last March, resulting in a bidding war for the book he spent 15 years writing to back up his claim. Publishing rights sold for $780,000, a phenomenal sum for a non-fiction book by an unknown author.

The book was published in England in November under the title "1421: The Year China Discovered America" and is now available in an augmented American edition published by William Morrow. A 16-page postscript in the new edition offers evidence that the body of a Chinese official was found buried at Teotihuacan, the pre-Aztec ceremonial site near Mexico City.

The Chinese-style tomb with Chinese inscriptions found by archaeologist William Niven at the base of the Pyramid of the Sun at Teotihuacan in 1911 contained a body identified as a Chinese or Mongolian wearing a necklace of jade, unknown in Mexico.

Menzies, who portions of the body were split between Swiss and Swedish collections, and he hopes to get permission to take DNA samples from the remains.

The author, a 65-year-old retired Royal Navy officer and navigation expert, began formulating his theory when he was shown a map of the world dated 1459 while doing research in Venice. The map clearly showed Southern Africa and the Cape of Good Hope, though Vasco da Gama did not "discover" the cape as a sea route to Asia until 1497. The map noted that a voyage had been made around the cape in 1420.

The map also bore a picture of a Chinese junk. Menzies believes the map was based on Chinese charts taken to Venice by a merchant traveler, Niccolo da Conti, who claimed in a book he wrote in 1434 that he joined a Chinese treasure fleet in India and sailed to China via Australia, 350 years before Captain Cook's expedition reached the Antipodes. There is no evidence of these Chinese charts, but Menzies presumes they existed.

His findings in Venice led Menzies to research existing Chinese documents describing the outfitting of a great treasure fleet by the Yongle Emperor, Zhui Di, under the command of his eunuch admiral Zheng Hi. The fleet of many-masted junks that were five times the size of European caravels and carried 1,000 men each made seven great voyages from 1405 to 1423 when the ships were mothballed as the result of an expensive land campaign against the invading Mongols.

It had long been known that Zheng Hi's ships sailed around Southeast Asia, crossing the Indian Ocean to the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf, but Menzies is convinced they also sailed around the Cape of Good Hope to Western Africa and across the Atlantic to the Eastern coast of North America, from Florida to Rhode Island, and parts of the South American coast. Other Chinese ships cleared Cape Horn and explored the Western coast of both South and North America, he claims.

Zheng Hi was also known by the name of Sin Bao, hence the legend that arose in Europe of the fabulous voyages of Sinbad the Sailor.

Menzies writes that after his lecture before the Royal Geographic Society, "new evidence began to pour in from all over the world, all of which had to be evaluated and checked for accuracy by experts." He said he has been notified of new discoveries from Vancouver Island to Chile that lend credence to his claim that Chinese fleets visited the Americas, leaving bloodline traces that only recently have been found in the DNA of Indians living in Northern Brazil, Venezuela, Surinam and Guyana.

In the United States, the accumulation of evidence of a pre-Columbian Chinese presence is strongest in California, around San Francisco, the Mississippi River area west of Kansas City, and Florida, the book says. Other American areas probably visited or even settled by Chinese are said to be Mexico between the Pacific coast and Mexico City, the Caribbean coast of Venezuela, Colombia, and Guyana, and the Amazon Basin.

Menzies reports 50 ancient stone carvings of ships believed to be Chinese and 40 of horses -- extinct in America after 10,000 B.C. -- from the floodplains of he Mississippi. He quotes 16th century Spanish historian Pedro de Castaneda as saying he met people resembling Chinese living along the Arkansas River and his contemporary, Pedro Menendez, as saying he saw the wrecks of gilded Chinese vessels on the banks of the Missouri River.

Menendez's report no longer seems incredible in light of the discovery 20 years ago of a medieval Chinese-style junk buried under a sandbank in the Sacramento River off the northeast corner of San Francisco Bay, Menzies says. Fragments of wood taken from the ship have been carbon-dated to 1410 and identified as cut from Keteleria, a Chinese evergreen tree unknown in America.

The author offers long lists of plants, animals, and birds that were carried to the Americas, probably by foreign visitors, in the pre-Columbian era. The first European explorers found fields of rice -- a crop foreign to the Americas but common in Asia -- in Mexico and Brazil and Chinese root crops in the Amazon basin. The list goes on and on.

This book is likely to be the most fascinating read of 2003.

("1421, The Year China Discovered America," by Gavin Menzies, William Morrow, 576 pages, $27.95.)

Copyright © 2001-2003 United Press International
 


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1421; america; archaeology; boat; china; chinese; dig; discovery; gavinmenzies; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; navigation; past; wood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: blam

Luzia, 11,500 years old. The oldest skeleton ever found in the Americas, Brazil.

81 posted on 01/12/2003 2:33:54 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Eternal_Bear
As long as you sight those stars all the way on the return voyage, you will hit Asia. Their massive ships could have easily supplied the crews for long voyages. It's that simple.

Sorry but its not. That's why so few cultures were able to master sailing in the open seas (no coast hugging) and returning home to the exact place from which they started.

If you don't have a calendar, you don't have an ephmeris.
If you don't have an ephmeris, you can't figure out where you are.
If you can't figure out where you are, you can't get back.

Thanks for the debate. We'll just have to agree to disagree. Chinese astronomy in 1650 was incapable of this kind of sophisticated open sea voyage using stellar navigation. The Chinese certainly didn't practice it in 1295. Therefore, it is unlikely (as I wrote in my first post) that the Chinese acquired all the knowledge of the heavens by 1400 (an item claimed by the author) to outperform navigational feats of the Vikings only to lose that knowledge by 1650.

82 posted on 01/12/2003 3:30:08 PM PST by MrsEmmaPeel (My cat is smarter than this idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Book claims Chinese discovered America

Has Al Gore claimed to have discovered America? I mean, he has claimed everything else, why not this?

83 posted on 01/12/2003 3:34:34 PM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
So, basically, we are to believe that between 1292 the Chinese absorbed all the knowledge of calendars and stellar navigation, discovered the Americas, then promptly forgot this knowledge by 1650.

I don't think so.

The white man stole it from them.

84 posted on 01/12/2003 4:16:04 PM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
I will add this in closing: The Vikings certainly had no ephemerises. I have no understanding why you contend that they were more advanced than the Chinese in navigation. The government scientists of China of 1650 may have not understood navigation but that doesn't mean that the common seafaring merchant didn't either. I have never heard of any navigational expert claim that you can't traverse oceans without an ephemeris. Good Day.
85 posted on 01/12/2003 4:24:58 PM PST by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
And there were reports of Mandans with blue eyes.

I think what it all boils down to is this:

Ancient people (from Europe, China, Africa, the Mediterranean, etc.) were much more capable of traversing great distances and oceans than we have previously thought.

86 posted on 01/12/2003 4:27:22 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Don't fool yoursel, the Europeans of Marco Polo's age (especialy North Western Europeans) with the exception of the Byzantines were unbathing moronons.

I am really trying my hardest to restrain myself from the obligatory insult of the present-day French here.

87 posted on 01/12/2003 4:29:53 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
DeSoto's associates must have attended dance lessons with the Mandan's circa 1541 when they were in the area.

On good authority, even the blackest of Asian eyes are overwhelmed with a certain type of hazel gene that causes all of the color to gather at the rim of he iris at puberty. The sons of Ir are exceedingly potent.

88 posted on 01/12/2003 5:19:33 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: blam; fightu4it; Paleo Conservative; No Truce With Kings
Many people forget that the Ainu of the Northern Japanese Islands are Caucasions. That Caucasians, Mongoloids could have crossed the landbridge into the Americas should not be a suprise. Negroids probably sailed to South America from Australia as well.
89 posted on 01/12/2003 8:01:34 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
The introduction of that much palladium would depress palladium prices, so that's not quite right. Something similar happened when the Spanish brought back massive quantities of silver from the New World. Ask yourself this: would you trade half your property for a bunch of palladium? Nah; no use for it. On the other hand, I'm all for space exploration.
90 posted on 01/12/2003 8:09:53 PM PST by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eternal_Bear
You totally overlook the fact that stars move. The earth moves. Stars, moons and planets change position with time. I double checked Mrs, Peel Full Moon example and it is an excellent one. If you don't get that point then I'm sorry for you.

Figuering out where you are on dry land is hard enough. A long distance voyage in open seas is impossible unless you know your astronomy. The Chinese didn't have it. They could not adjust their own calendar (based on pure observation) on their own -- and those calculations were fixed at 120 E, they sure as heck were incapable of finding their way in open seas.

Stars move, the earth moves .. the boat moves ... Suppose you have perfect weather going .. bad weather coming what do you do? Stars rise and set at different times ...

91 posted on 01/13/2003 3:07:42 AM PST by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
Are you an astronomer? You have an excellent understanding of the issues.
92 posted on 01/13/2003 3:09:09 AM PST by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
"Sorry but its not. That's why so few cultures were able to master sailing in the open seas (no coast hugging) and returning home to the exact place from which they started.

If you don't have a calendar, you don't have an ephmeris.
If you don't have an ephmeris, you can't figure out where you are.
If you can't figure out where you are, you can't get back."

Hmmm. . . someone forgot to tell the Polynesians that, I guess. They managed some impressive feats of navigation without an ephemeris. In fact, without a compass. Probably the most primitive open-ocean sailors in history.

Actually, according to your assertions Columbus could not have crossed the Atlantic. He did not return home to the "exact same place" from which he started, as his return voyage was considerably north of his outward voyage. (He wanted the wind behind him. So you take a southerly track out, catching the trades, and a northerly track back, catching the westerlies.

The point-to-point navigation of which you speak did not exist much prior to the mid 19th century. Columbus, Magellan, Cabot, Drake, et al, pretty much used navigational tools and techniques that were virtually identical to those available to the 14th and 15th century Chinese -- log line, quadrant, sand glass, and compass. In fact, Columbus really did not use a quadrant well. He mostly depended upon log line, glass, and compass, and generally made a hash of it when he tried to do celestial navigation.

The real reason that there was so little deep-sea navigation was less navigation limitations as lack of destinations. Look at maps of civizations prior to 1500 (European, Arab, Indian, Chinese, and Amerindian). What open-ocean routes are commonly taken.

Among the Europeans, there were only two. A day-sail across the North Sea, or a voyage from the Basque or Breton coast to the Grand Banks. (Yup, those primative fisherman, without even an ephemaris.)

The Arabs and Indians shared one -- sailing from the Horn of Africa to India on the monsoon winds.

The Chinese? The Pacific is mighty wide, and there isn't much of value on the other side. Although Cheng Ho did cross open ocean on his voyages between Africa and India.

The main reason open-ocean travel became common after 1500 has nothing to do with technology, and everything to do with economics. New Spain, New France, and New England provided an incentive to cross open ocean that was absent previously.

And I think you are underestimating the Chinese. They were considerably more sophisticated -- at least their seagoing technology -- than the Europeans of the 14th and 15th century. I don't think they circumnavigated the globe, but I would not be surprised if they doubled the Cape of Good Hope.

You might want to read Ma Huan's "Ying-Yai Sheng-Lan" (The Overall Survey of the Ocean's Shores). It documents the Cheng Ho expeditions. An English translation was published by the Hakluyt Society (London) in 1970, with a reprint by the White Lotus Co. (Bankok) in 1997. It should be available through interlibrary loan.
93 posted on 01/13/2003 4:46:18 AM PST by No Truce With Kings (amazed at what primitive technology is needed for ocean navigation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
Before spending nearly thirty dollars, consider finding a copy of COULUBUS WAS LAST by Patrick Huyghe

Thanks for the tip - my local library had a copy, and I have started reading it. It looks fascinating...
94 posted on 01/13/2003 5:25:30 PM PST by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: maro
Hi maro!

Mining and exploiting that much PGM would indeed cause a financial collapse IF it were not handled appropriately. Spain, of course, is the classic example.

I hope that one day we will have orbiting smelting and processing facilities in conjunction with zero-G vacuum manufacturing and fabrication facilities that can take advantage of the unique properties some PGMs possess. Manning these facilities shouldn't be required; they would most likely be automated.

95 posted on 01/14/2003 12:14:30 AM PST by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
All the empiracal evidence suggests that ancient seafarers were criss crossing oceans long before so called modern navigation was developed in the 18th Century: cocaine found in Egyptian mummies; the cinnamon trade between Rome and the East Indies via Madagascar; the vast voyages of discovery and commerce that the Polynesians and the Micronesians demonstrated. Even Columbus couldn't determine longitude and he criscrossed the Ocean numerous times. His instrumentation was no better than the Chinese.

What is your point? Are you saying Oceanic voyages were impossible before the modern age? For two and a half centuries Europeans criscrossed the Atlantic without accurate calendars or timepieces. How do you explain that? Doesn't that blow a hole in your ludicrous assertions?

96 posted on 01/14/2003 3:25:25 PM PST by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

Not a ping, just a GGG update.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

97 posted on 12/28/2004 8:28:40 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("The odds are very much against inclusion, and non-inclusion is unlikely to be meaningful." -seamole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

I could be wrong but I thought the Indians discovered America. They were here when Columbus got here and also when the Chinese came here to do their laundry.


98 posted on 12/28/2004 8:42:19 PM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Thanks for bumping this article. I missed it first time around...

I was having dinner with my parents a few weeks back, and the subject of the Chinese discovery of America came up. I must admit that I had never heard such a claim, but was told of the following discovery, which this author also cites:

Menendez's report no longer seems incredible in light of the discovery 20 years ago of a medieval Chinese-style junk buried under a sandbank in the Sacramento River off the northeast corner of San Francisco Bay, Menzies says. Fragments of wood taken from the ship have been carbon-dated to 1410 and identified as cut from Keteleria, a Chinese evergreen tree unknown in America.

Any idea where the remains of the junk are kept?

99 posted on 12/28/2004 8:59:07 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (Fraud is the lifeblood of the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

thx very interesting.


100 posted on 12/28/2004 9:09:31 PM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson