Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Control "LOGIC"
NRA Magazine: America's First Freedom Jan 2003 ^ | January 2003 | Kentucky Coalition for Concealed Carry

Posted on 01/01/2003 1:09:16 PM PST by ExSoldier

The Kentucky coalition to Carry Concealed recently published some examples of gun control “logic” on it’s web site. We’ve included some of the more interesting tidbits here, with thanks to that organization.

Banning guns works, which is why New York, D.C., and Chicago cops need guns.

Washington DC’s low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis’ high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.

An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 magnum, will get angry and kill you.

A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.

The New England Journal of Medicine is filled with expert advice about guns; just like Guns & Ammo has some excellent treatises on heart surgery

One should consult an automotive engineer for safewr seatbelts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for internal medicine, a computer programmer for hard drive problems and Sarah Brady for firearms expertise.

The Second Amendment, ratified in 1791 refers to the National Guard, which was created 112 years later in 1903.

These phrases: “The right of the people peaceably to assemble,” “right of the people to be secure in their homes.” “enumeration of herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people,” and “The powers not delegated herein are reserved to the states respectively and to the people” all refer to individuals, but “the right of the people to keep and bear arms” refers to the state.

The NRA’s “don’t touch” campaign about kids handling guns is propaganda, but the anti-gun lobby’s attempt to run a “don’t touch” campaign is responsible social activity.

Most people can’t be trusted, so we should have laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.

Citizens don’t need to carry a gun for personal protection, but police chiefs who are deskbound administrators who work in a building filled with cops, need a gun.

Trigger locks do not interfere with the ability to use a gun for defensive purposes, which is why you see police officers with one on their duty weapons.

Handgun Control, Inc. says it wants to “keep guns out of the wrong hands.”

Guess what?

YOU have the “wrong hands.”


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Free Republic; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: OXENinFLA
And the Optimist of the Year Award goes to....
I have always loved that photo of our esteemed communist senator with her finger in the trigger guard, bolt closed, magazine installed and raking the muzzle across her crowd of supporters blabbing about all she knows about gun safety. GOOD FIND!
21 posted on 01/05/2003 12:13:01 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WFTR; ExSoldier; Tunehead54; wardaddy
bookmark this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/involved?group=152
22 posted on 01/06/2003 5:51:57 PM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blue Collar Christian
puts teeth in the old saw: "When they outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns."; by their own logic, it makes perfect sense.
23 posted on 01/06/2003 5:53:28 PM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: packrat01
Thanks....I have all those bump lists around somewhere...lol....if I could only find them.
24 posted on 01/06/2003 8:20:39 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Come on up to Kanada, and see our crazy-Canuck version of 'Gun Control Logic'. My Prime Minister is an IDIOT.
25 posted on 01/06/2003 10:20:20 PM PST by CampX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
FYI, here's the cite you're looking for.

"We already know that licensing and registration will be counterproductive because the U.S. Supreme Court (Haynes v. U.S., 390 US 85, 1968) has unequivocally ruled that criminals cannot be legally required to register their firearms, and they cannot be convicted for possessing an unregistered firearm. It makes no sense at all to enact laws which can only be used to convict previously law-abiding citizens while criminals get a free pass.

26 posted on 01/08/2003 6:13:01 AM PST by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson