OK, money where the mouth is. I'll go first.
Tuesday (early a.m. Korean Peninsula time) July 29, 2003
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: AmericanInTokyo
June 15, 2003
Before dawn Korean time
2 posted on
12/26/2002 1:20:45 PM PST by
Sparta
To: AmericanInTokyo
I hate to be so negative, but can we take a bet on how many Allied cities get nuked? I say two American and three Japanese cities go up.
3 posted on
12/26/2002 1:21:52 PM PST by
Sparta
To: AmericanInTokyo
2 am(Korean Time) May 1,2003
4 posted on
12/26/2002 1:22:27 PM PST by
Dog
To: AmericanInTokyo
Its easy. Iraq does not have any nukes yet so we will threaten to attack it, pressure it with war talk, humiliate its leadership and attack it at will.
North Korea has nukes and WMD and therefore we we will NEVER threaten to attack it, NEVER pressure it with war talk, NEVER humiliate its leadership and WILL NOT attack it at will. We will even allow it to finish deliveries on scud missiles we seize on the high seas to Yemen.
This sends a very clear message heard round the world; If you do not have nukes and WMD the USA will treat you like Yugoslavia and Iraq if you develop nukes and WMD (and the ability to deliver them) in time you will be treated with distance and respect like we treat Pakistan, and North Korea.
That is why I know Iraq does not have online nukes (chemical and bio weapons are 19th century technology so it is very possible the Iraqis can make and use them with little difficulty) at the moment because we are bullying Iraq around at will UNLIKE how we are treating North Korea.
5 posted on
12/26/2002 1:26:13 PM PST by
Destro
To: AmericanInTokyo
Attack on North Korea Betting Pool Who attacked the betting pool? Where? When? How many bettors dead? Wounded? On the other hand, that'll learn 'em to engage in illegal gambling activities!
To: AmericanInTokyo
Will not happen in 2003 and maybe not in 2004. My guess is a lot of internal working to change leaders.
10 posted on
12/26/2002 1:30:49 PM PST by
KeyWest
To: AmericanInTokyo
Place your bet as to when the attack will begin. Whoever gets closest to the date and time wins. When's the election? Nov. 2004?
My guess is September 15, 2004.
13 posted on
12/26/2002 1:32:54 PM PST by
copycat
To: AmericanInTokyo
I predict North Korean nuclear plants are reduced to rubble July 4, 2003 by a massive bolt of lightning. Or, maybe it will be on the "Great Leader's" birthday, whichever is first. (Crystal ball is cloudy.) I also HOPE this happens.
To: AmericanInTokyo
The time of our attack can be most precisely stated as "long overdue".
18 posted on
12/26/2002 1:48:56 PM PST by
per loin
To: AmericanInTokyo
July 4th, 2029. When Kim dies, the NK military sues for peace. Starving NK refugees flood South across the mined border with 15% casualties.
Until then, we wait. Bill Clinton let this nuclear cat out of the bag, and millions more North Koreans will pay for it by starving to death. We will build a strong box, and they will rot within it.
Damned shame, that.
To: AmericanInTokyo
There will be no attack
China and Japan will resolve the problem.
22 posted on
12/26/2002 1:57:45 PM PST by
bert
To: AmericanInTokyo
Interesting topic. I'd rather error too early than too late. Let's say May 15, 2003, at 12 am Pyongpyang time.
To: AmericanInTokyo
I am usually an upbeat kind a guy, but this NK thang looks grim. I think we will have to take it out prior to the NK recovering plutonium from the reactor rods. I pick 2/12/03.
26 posted on
12/26/2002 2:23:22 PM PST by
Maynerd
To: AmericanInTokyo
Never. The Chinese have far more reason to prevent NK from being actively nuclear - it's no secret that country can fall apart at basically any time, and any missile that can reach the US can hit anything in China.
This stuff about NK is a tempest in a teapot. Let's get our troops out of the South and let the local powers handle the fruitcakes. By the time NK can reach us with missiles we will be able to shoot them down. Time to let the heavy hitters over there clean up their own neighborhood. China wants to be taken seriously as a global player? Let's give them the chance to show what they would do about a lunatic with nukes on their border.
To: AmericanInTokyo
February 5, 2003. Around noon EST. In other words, right around the time we become fully engaged in battle with Iraq. That's when NK will try something stupid, using the "Americans no longer have enough military to fight two wars at once" gambit. And NK will discover they're wrong.
34 posted on
12/26/2002 3:06:17 PM PST by
Timesink
To: AmericanInTokyo
Were not going to attack North Korea at all.
35 posted on
12/26/2002 3:39:36 PM PST by
Husker24
To: AmericanInTokyo
I think we'll let China know that we'd have no objection to them annexing North Korea after whatever action they feel is necessary. As long as they move in the next year or so.
44 posted on
12/26/2002 6:58:20 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: AmericanInTokyo
21 April 2003
0200 local.
Meega, Nala Kweesta!!!
To: AmericanInTokyo; Poohbah; section9; Long Cut
Hmm...
August 1, 2003 - 0130 Yongbyong time.
49 posted on
12/27/2002 5:49:20 AM PST by
hchutch
To: AmericanInTokyo
April 28th 2003
52 posted on
12/27/2002 12:01:28 PM PST by
Kennesaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson