THE REAL HILLARY CLINTON: Episode #2 - Children in the Hospital

various sources | 12-22-02 | dfu

[doug from upland]

NOTE: the survival of our Republic is threatened by two things -- fundamentalist Islamic terrorists and Hillary Rodham Clinton. President Bush is leading the fight against the terrorists. It is up to those of us who know the real Hillary Clinton to lead the fight against her. We must shine the light of truth on this dangerous woman so that all Americans may know the real Hillary.

#2 in a series.

(Story originally appreared in the American Spectator, March 97)

It seems that Hillary, who's had her fingerprints found on all the new scandals that are breaking on a daily basis is trying to fix her public image.

So, to promote the new effort, showing how deeply Hillary cares about children, especially sick children in hospitals, Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington got a call. Hillary Clinton would be coming over soon with children's author Maurice Sendak. Hillary's advance team would be showing up arranging the security and logistics. The team did show up. What they saw horrified them.

The kids in the hospital children's ward really looked sick! Some of them had tubes sticking out. Some had lost their hair to chemotherapy. Some were groggy because of the pain killers they had to take.

Hospital officials were quickly told this would not do. Hillary would look bad in a newspaper photo if she posed with sickly looking children. They were told. "No children that look drowsy, skip bald kids, sick looking kids, or kids with tubes sticking out."

So here's what the hospital actually did. They outfitted a hospital conference room with toys and kids decorations. They ordered hospital staff members to bring in their healthy children who would pose as sick children in photos with the great St. Hillary.

So, on January 10th, Hillary Clinton showed up to Georgetown University Medical Center and read to a bunch of kids with author Maurice Sendak. Had you read the papers or heard the news the next day, you might have been bowled over by her compassion. Actually she demonstrated the opposite. You see the real sick kids, who were originally told they would be visited by the first lady were originally extremely happy and excited at the prospect of her visit.

When they were later told, they were too sick looking to be with the great Hillary, some became deeply depressed. After all how would anyone feel not being good enough for Ms. compassion herself.

Of course the press published the photos of Hillary reading to the cute kids the next day. They just forgot to tell you that Hillary, in the quest of the perfect photo could not bring herself to be photographed with an actual sick child.

The phony mask of compassion that Hillary hides behind has slipped once again. Just around Purim time too!

[Mears]

I agree with everyone,she's a woman who wants POWER,but the people of New York elected her senator-----Why?

[sheik yerbouty]

Mr. and Mrs. Beelzebubba..

[laredo44]

Do any photos exist from this event, perhaps with hospital staff children identified in them. Without those photos, this will be laughed off by Cankles.

[doug from upland]

I have unsuccessfully searched for photos. Perhaps someone in DC can locate a nurse willing to go on record. I'd love to have her on my next radio show. Whoops, I must be PC. The nurse could be male. In that case, I'd love to have him on my next radio show.

[Mia T]

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.

Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering,

by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

Q ERTY8

A LEGACY OF LYNCHING

 

evidence of consciousness of guilt

at Ron Brown's funeral

 

YOO-HOO Mrs. clinton:

THE CLINTON RAPES ARE

 

"UNBECOMING"

 

Q ERTY3

"YOU KNOW"

zipper-hoisted

PRENUP/POST-RAPE SENATE SEAT

Q ERTY4

AMERICAN MUSEUM--ER--MUSLIM COUNCIL

it won't s-p-i-n

KNOWNOTHING VICTIM RODHAM/CLINTON REVISITED

 

^{Q ERTY2} "There isn't a shred of evidence."

 

 

HILLARY, YOU KNOW, ^{KnowNothing Victim} Q ERTY4 ^{double bagel},

 

W I D E B O D Y. _{low-center-of-gravity}

Dim Bulb _{Congenital Bottom Feeder}

 

kleptocratic

 

Hardball's Softball hillary clinton 'Interview'

 

Q ERTY9

BUSH: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."

 

Q ERTY6

utter failure

 _{rodham-clinton} ^{reality-check}

Democrat Debacle of '02

Q ERTY8

BUMP!

[KeyBored]

"My question is: Where is the media during this? If a republican did something even close to this, it would have been splashed across every network and newspaper everywhere?"

If one accepts the premise that the media acts as an arm of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), then you've answered your own question.

[KeyBored]

". . . .but the people of New York elected her senator-----Why?"

How's this for starters?

1. There's a sizable percentage of the NY electorate that would elect Fidel Castro to office if he were running.
2. Vote fraud
3. "Tough" (yeah, right) NY media. They were tough, all right. On Lazio.

[Fred Mertz]

Bump!

[KeyBored]

"It is up to those of us who know the real Hillary Clinton to lead the fight against her. We must shine the light of truth on this dangerous woman so that all Americans may know the real Hillary."

I am of the opinion that a Hilliary! presidency is not inevitable.

It could happen, however, given the right conditions. We must be dilligent in keeping these stories before the public, but at the same time not appear like whackos.

One could make a case that the Sinkmeister's rabid support from his apologists was fueled in part by the Right's utter disdain for him. Illustrating the law of unintended consequences, so to speak.

While none of us possess a crystal ball to know what the future might bring, here are some conditions that would have to be in place in 2004 for the Hildabeast to mount a successful campaign. Note I'm not addressing 2008 - we should worry about one election at a time and there are simply too many variables involved in looking at something that far ahead.

1. The "War on Terrorism" going badly. The 'crats could then paint themselves as the "peace party" and, given their general obstructionist past, say "see, I told you so"
2. The economy doing poorly. Always a possibility - it is a cyclical. We could have the misfortune of the business cycle being in a downturn co-inciding with the 2004 election.
3. Some sort of scandal involving Bush or his administration. You can bet that the "fair and balanced" media is pursuing leads even now. And this would allow "moral relevance" taking the issue away from the Repubs.

Given any or all of those conditions (and others that can't be forseen) a 'Beast run in 2004 could happen. She probably wouldn't go the primary route - she would instead accept a draft at a deadlocked convention. A coronation, so to speak.

If there was a viable third party candidate splitting the conservatives, that would make her task even easier.

In closing, we should remember this: We must make our case to the "mushy middle" i.e. the 20-30 percent of the undecideds that decide elections. Make our case clearly, locigally, and succinctly without going "over the top".

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

bump

[KLT]

I guess so....you are right, and all of our assumptions have been correct...

[swheats]

How can anyone with a conscious that work around Hillary allow this woman to continue her devious deeds? Her day of reckoning has to come.

[JoeSixPack1]

From the GitGo Hitlery has been in charge of Bill. I am amazed that any freeper does not already know all this.

Hitlery's stunts are so outrageous as to be unbelievable by normal standards. The antics she has pulled get a pass because the outragouosness is so far out there in la-la land, the press figures no one would believe them anyway and they would lose their jobs in a heartbeat if they exposed it.

But Hitlery has no limit, no boundry, no ambition, or pulled any stunt that is too low for her to go to get her way. She is the embodiment of unlimited personal political power and corruption unbound by any sort of moral code or Constitutional standard.

She is the icon for corruption and partisanship with which all others will be judged evermore. She is a bigger threat to our Constitution then any other person, government, or coalition on this planet.

[Skooz]

Bump

[Timesink]

You ask how Hillary could possibly be elected? She is a master manipulator. She will be drafted at the convention in 2004 and not have to be bloodied in the primaries.

No she won't. The presidential election process simply doesn't work that way any more. There are plenty of down-and-dirty RATS that want to run in 2008, and are also young enough to owe NOTHING to the Queen. They're not going to sit back and/or roll over for some fat old hag that is largely responsible for the utter destruction of their party over the prior 15+ years.

I think most people on FR wildly overestimate Hitlery's popularity within her own party. Except for the lesbian contingent and the hardcore Clintonistas (of whom there are fewer with each passing day), the RATS want her to run about as much as they did Al Gore. Maybe 20-25% tops.

[friendly]

Can this story of Hillary at Georgetown possibly be true? Is there any evidence that this incident ever took place? Are their any archieved photos?

I know she is evil and I know the press is whorishly sycophantic, but this is beyond pathological: that she would actually harm really sick children while engaged in a total fraud.

[doug from upland]

I've searched for photos and cannot find any. Perhaps someone in DC can find a nurse at Georgetown who can help us. The story is from INSIGHT. I am certain they did their homework and got a source or multiple sources.

[CARepubGal]

Sign me up. Please.

[BrucefromMtVernon]

Heaven forbid any FReeper taking time out from FreeRepublic. But www.davidicke.com (author David Icke) contains some fascinating truths concerning the Reptilian Agenda, going several steps (if not leagues) beyond Zecharia Sitchin. Hillary Clinton isn't even human! She shape-shifts into a reptilian creature on a regular basis. So does Henry Kissinger.

[Vigilanteman]

In 1972, three candidates won roughly equal portions of the vote in the Democrat primary. One, an old-fashioned southern Democrat, actually managed to win northern states like Michigan and Maryland. Another, an old-line liberal with union backing, was the favorite of the party machinery. The winner was a radical leftist with hard-core support among the core group which has since taken over the party machinery. By today's standards among the party, he looks almost moderate. Can you name them?