Skip to comments.
Frist a Major Shareholder in Reputed For-Profit Abortion Provider
Human Events ^
| 12-20-02
| Terry Jeffrey
Posted on 12/19/2002 10:26:29 PM PST by The Old Hoosier
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 601-610 next last
To: The Old Hoosier
BTTT!
To: Howlin
..Well, this didn't take long, did it?....
Howlin this is the results of not slapping the last bunch of racist pimps down and telling them to go fly a kite. They were left to run free. It is gonna be like this till Bush and a few others get some stones and decide to step up to the plate. imo.
22
posted on
12/19/2002 10:50:14 PM PST
by
deport
To: MHGinTN
Ping
To: The Old Hoosier
Should you consider trying any harder to not be a single issue voter? His FATHER and BROTHER started the company. If you are going to hold each and every person in Congress accountable to their families, you'd better be ready to oust many of them.
To: The Old Hoosier
To: The Old Hoosier
i'm so tired of one-issue politics, and black and white thinking.
that's what elected the clintons. the pat robertsons and jerry falwells stayed home and didn't vote for bush senior.
26
posted on
12/19/2002 10:51:44 PM PST
by
koax
To: Bella_Bru
He makes millions of dollars off of this. It has nothing to do with his family. If he's seriously pro-life, as he claims to be, then he should. If not, then he's a liar. Take your pick.
To: koax
Ross Perot elected the Clintons.
To: Bella_Bru
What I meant to say is, "he should divest."
To: The Old Hoosier
A shameless, slimy hit piece, and I say this as a longtime, vocal opponent of abortion.
30
posted on
12/19/2002 10:53:41 PM PST
by
beckett
To: beckett
How is this a slimy hit piece? Where is it wrong? The man is an abortion profiteer.
To: The Old Hoosier
I bet I can prove that you somehow profit from abortions.
I think if you want to prove that Frist will be worse for the Pro-Life agenda that Lott has been, then you are going to have to do better than this. Lott has done nothing to advance the pro-life cause. He couldn't hold a Majority in the senate long enough to get a single pro-life judge appointed to even a Federal Magistrate position.
The battle for abortion can only be fought in the courts. Lott's record in getting conservative judges on the bench appears to be a big fat zero.
To: The Old Hoosier
**Should Republicans in the Senate be led by a man who profits from abortions?**
Plain and simple and loud. NO!
To: The Old Hoosier
"Frist a Major Shareholder in Reputed For-Profit Abortion Provider "
Oh please. Give us an effing break. Is this author a refugee from the Buchanan Brigades ?
34
posted on
12/19/2002 10:54:50 PM PST
by
Maynerd
To: Maynerd
Buchanan BrigadesYou can smell 'em a mile away.
To: The Old Hoosier
ross did his part, but many of the christian righteous stayed home because they were pissed at bush.
36
posted on
12/19/2002 10:55:38 PM PST
by
koax
To: Howlin
Boy, the one-issue pro-lifers sure have a rapid response team!
37
posted on
12/19/2002 10:55:49 PM PST
by
PianoMan
To: Howlin
No it didn't
38
posted on
12/19/2002 10:56:07 PM PST
by
Mo1
To: The Old Hoosier
So what is the big deal? Now that the media has conspired with the clever dems to destroy Lott, it appears to be time for single-issue interests to smear another Republican.
Frist is the choice of the White House, for SML. That is good enough for me. What motivates an article such as this?
Just as I oppose islamist-mullah-dictatorships, run by sharia law, I would suppose it should be okay to oppose running the USA under fundamentalist Christian laws, too.
To: P-Marlowe
Lott is worthless. No argument there.
But there is a big difference between material cooperation in evil--which everyone does without knowing it--and doing what Frist does, which is to knowingly keep stock that helps him profit from abortion.
If you believe that Clinton was bad just because of his total shallowness and lack of character, then you should have some questions about a senator who makes money off abortions and claims to be pro-life, in spite of his own statements during his 1994 election campaign.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 601-610 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson