I think if you want to prove that Frist will be worse for the Pro-Life agenda that Lott has been, then you are going to have to do better than this. Lott has done nothing to advance the pro-life cause. He couldn't hold a Majority in the senate long enough to get a single pro-life judge appointed to even a Federal Magistrate position.
The battle for abortion can only be fought in the courts. Lott's record in getting conservative judges on the bench appears to be a big fat zero.
But there is a big difference between material cooperation in evil--which everyone does without knowing it--and doing what Frist does, which is to knowingly keep stock that helps him profit from abortion.
If you believe that Clinton was bad just because of his total shallowness and lack of character, then you should have some questions about a senator who makes money off abortions and claims to be pro-life, in spite of his own statements during his 1994 election campaign.
I bet I can prove that Lott does not profit from racial segregation. What does it mean?
Other than the general moral decay in society has penetrated the GOP ranks to a degree that makes the 'conservative' party as morally repugnant as their 'left wing' opponents.
And you honestly think that Frist will back pro-life judges over pro-death judges?
Sometimes I really wonder if Republicans are as dumb as Democrats. Then you come along and prove that they are.
Not true. The Constitution gives Congress the power to remove any particular issue from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. All it would take is simple majority of the Congress.
But that require two things: a pro-life majority and a Republican party with balls. Neither of which, we currently have.