[truth_seeker]

So what is the big deal? Now that the media has conspired with the clever dems to destroy Lott, it appears to be time for single-issue interests to smear another Republican.

Frist is the choice of the White House, for SML. That is good enough for me. What motivates an article such as this?

Just as I oppose islamist-mullah-dictatorships, run by sharia law, I would suppose it should be okay to oppose running the USA under fundamentalist Christian laws, too.

[Delphinium]

I would suppose it should be okay to oppose running the USA under fundamentalist Christian laws, too.

If you really are a truth seeker you will find that our republic is already based on Christian, and Jewish laws.

Samuel Chase, member Continental Congress and Associate Supreme Court Justice - “ By our form of government, the Christian religion is the established religion; and all sects and denominations of Christians are placed upon the same equal footing, and are equally entitled to protection in their religious liberty.”

William Paterson, signer of the Constitution, placed on the Supreme Court by George Washington, constantly pointed out that - “the Constitution would not keep America on course.” He said that what would keep America safe would be to obey what God has told us in the sacred scriptures. He would close his speeches with Proverbs 29:2 “ When the righteous rule, the people rejoice. When the wicked rule, the people groan.”

President George Washington – “It is impossible to rightly govern … without God and the Bible.” Note: Washington’s religious and moral maxims alone fill over 50 pages of a book, “Maxims of George Washington”, published Mount Vernon Ladies Association in 1989.

[Howlin]

Just as I oppose islamist-mullah-dictatorships, run by sharia law, I would suppose it should be okay to oppose running the USA under fundamentalist Christian laws, too.

I'll gladly join you in that sentiment, if you don't mind.

[ksen]

Just as I oppose islamist-mullah-dictatorships, run by sharia law, I would suppose it should be okay to oppose running the USA under fundamentalist Christian laws, too.

Why are you trying to equate fundamental Islamists with fundamental Christians?

[A Vast RightWing Conspirator]

Frist is the choice of the White House, for SML. That is good enough for me. What motivates an article such as this?

This statement coming from someone who calls himeslf 'truth seeker'? Ah... the comedy of it!!!

[DAnconia55]

Just as I oppose islamist-mullah-dictatorships, run by sharia law, I would suppose it should be okay to oppose running the USA under fundamentalist Christian laws, too.

Laws against murder aren't fundamentalist.