Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush, Blair warned of bin Laden nukes Al-Qaida purchased 20 suitcase arms fm former KGB agents, says
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | December 14, 2002

Posted on 12/15/2002 10:50:57 AM PST by Mossad1967

President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair have been warned Osama bin Laden has 20 suitcase nuclear weapons obtained for cash from former KGB agents, the London Sunday Express reports in tomorrow's editions.

Last October, WorldNetDaily broke the story of bin Laden’s suitcase nukes, detailed in a new book by an FBI consultant on international terrorism.

The book,''Al Qaeda: Brotherhood of Terror,'' by Paul L. Williams, says bin Laden purchased 20 suitcase nuclear weapons in 1998 from former KGB agents for $30 million. The deal is reportedly one of three in the last decade in which al-Qaida purchased small nuclear weapons or weapons-grade nuclear uranium.

Williams says bin Laden's search for nuclear weapons began in 1988 when he hired a team of five nuclear scientists from Turkmenistan. These were former employees at the atomic reactor in Iraq before it was destroyed by Israel, Williams says. The team's project was the development of a nuclear reactor that could be used ''to transform a very small amount of material that could be placed in a package smaller than a backpack.''

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Does anyone know if the London Sunday Express is a legitimate newspaper?
1 posted on 12/15/2002 10:50:57 AM PST by Mossad1967
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
I'm still trying to make sense of the thread title.
2 posted on 12/15/2002 10:52:51 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Time for the proverbial shower!
3 posted on 12/15/2002 10:58:55 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rintense
HA!.. I dare ya to say the title 10 times really fast
4 posted on 12/15/2002 11:00:50 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
The London Sunday Express is like a supermarket tabloid. I don't think that I would call it a reliable source.
5 posted on 12/15/2002 11:01:23 AM PST by The Real Deal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
I just watched the movie "The Sum of All fears"
6 posted on 12/15/2002 11:04:46 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
The story says that the devices yield a 1 kiloton blast. I suppose it could be worse. I'd think that if any of those devices were to be detonated, we'd respond with something a bit more powerful, as in megaton weapons...
7 posted on 12/15/2002 11:06:28 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
HAHAHAHAHAHA! It is quite a tongue twister.
8 posted on 12/15/2002 11:07:37 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Soviet nukes used relatively impure weapons-grade fissionables by Western standards. It decayed fast due to the impurities and had to be removed and "recooked" every 8-10 years. The Soviets found it easier to do that than to cook the stuff right the first time.

I wouldn't worrry about xSoviet nukes. At this point they will likely just fizzle and cause an ungodly mess. The backpack types would likely not even do that.

9 posted on 12/15/2002 11:08:05 AM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
>The book,''Al Qaeda: Brotherhood of Terror,'' by Paul L. Williams, says bin Laden purchased 20 suitcase nuclear weapons in 1998 from former KGB agents for $30 million. ... he hired a team of five nuclear scientists from Turkmenistan. ...

Sounds like bin Laden
has been watching too many
Austin Powers films ...

10 posted on 12/15/2002 11:10:13 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Here's a link..

Sunday Express

11 posted on 12/15/2002 11:11:35 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
What do you think?

Tabloid news of this sort is questionable and rarely credible.

You are not flying your flag and your screen name sounds like you may know more in your part of the world. What is your opinion is this a scare tactic or real? Or both?


12 posted on 12/15/2002 11:13:34 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Ok, lemme get this straight. In other words, According to Bush, Blair warned Bush that he was warned of the Bin Laden nukes?
13 posted on 12/15/2002 11:14:15 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
The Express is a major London newspaper. Many big city newspapers are published in "tabloid format" so that they can be more easily read on the underground and on busses. Muslims do not buy it however as it is seen as a racist "Crusader" paper. Note its masthead. The Times and the Express are Tory, i.e. right of center papers.
14 posted on 12/15/2002 11:15:31 AM PST by Edmund Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Kind of reminds ya of "No time for Sergeants" when thy recruiter asks the forms to be filled out with "Last name first, first name, middle name last."

Of course Andy Griffiths character writes:

Stockdale Will Will [his Middle Name] Stockdale
15 posted on 12/15/2002 11:17:30 AM PST by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Did you take the title from an SAT test question? Ya know, where you detect the pattern and write what the next line should be?

The correct answer is:

a) Blair warned Bin Laden of Bush nukes

b) Bin Laden warned Bush

c) Bush warned Bin Laden of Blair

e) Blair warned Nuke Laloosh of Annie
16 posted on 12/15/2002 11:21:18 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Does anyone know if the London Sunday Express is a legitimate newspaper?

The London Sunday Express is more legitimate than most U.S. newspapers

17 posted on 12/15/2002 11:26:47 AM PST by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Ditto. I'd believe the Sunday Express before I'd believe the Washington Post. And tabloid is not a dirty word, folks. It's also a description. For instance, the NY Post is a tabloid, and the Washington Post is a broadsheet. Three guesses which of the two I think is more accurate...
18 posted on 12/15/2002 11:31:17 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
bttt
19 posted on 12/15/2002 11:38:27 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Time for the proverbial shower!

Sounds like it to me too.
It looks like a liberal media motive to take the focus off of "SADDAM".

20 posted on 12/15/2002 11:41:21 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson