Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Good to get this done now so that the Dims can't appoint Bill Clinton as chief justice under Hilllary
1 posted on 12/07/2002 12:00:17 PM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: All
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/home.htm
2 posted on 12/07/2002 12:01:31 PM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia are both great guys and seeing either one of them on the Chief Justice's bench would make my day.
4 posted on 12/07/2002 12:03:04 PM PST by Commander8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
Clarence Thomas as Chief Justice? Yes, yes, and a thousand times yes! He's understated, analytical but practical, precise, careful, and would make a great Chief Justice!
6 posted on 12/07/2002 12:07:58 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
Bush, however, has been told that Justice Thomas isn't keen on going through the meat grinder again.

Well, I think Clarence Thomas should go for it anyhow. He would make a fine Chief Justice. Screw the meat grinder. The 'Rats already took their best shot and with the Republicans in control, it will be a relative shoo-in. Let the 'Rats lose more support with the black voters by trying to smear Thomas once again.

10 posted on 12/07/2002 12:12:54 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
I love Justice Thomas, but IMO, Scalia is THE MAN for the job.
16 posted on 12/07/2002 12:15:23 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
GOOD!!!
18 posted on 12/07/2002 12:16:25 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
All Conservatives please note: The correct title is "Chief Justice of the United States," not "Chief Justice of the Supreme Court." It would be nice if the right side in the forthcoming bloodbath would get that consistently correct.
19 posted on 12/07/2002 12:16:38 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
It will be interesting to hear what Joe Biden and Ted Kennedy have to say about a Thomas nomination.
20 posted on 12/07/2002 12:16:46 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
That was BEFORE Clinton. It may be more difficult this time to use the sexual harassment argument.
21 posted on 12/07/2002 12:17:22 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
I don't think Hillary could do that - at least not lawfully - because x42 has already been denied the privilege of practicing before the Supreme Court. If he cannot practice there, I wouldn't suppose he could head the court - but then we are talking about the Liar in Chief - so I guess anything goes!
25 posted on 12/07/2002 12:20:50 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
I love it! I love it!!!!
32 posted on 12/07/2002 12:26:24 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

34 posted on 12/07/2002 12:26:42 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
Oh, I hope he goes for Thomas. Nina Totenberg and Harry Belafonte would have nuclear hissy-fits, the Dems would end up looking like the hypocrites they are when it comes to sexual harrassment, and with Powell, Rice, and Thomas occupying three of the most powerful offices in the world, black voters will finally start asking pointed questions about who is doing the talking and who is doing the achievement.

This means that Clarence Thomas will have to stand tall in the face of incredible vilification, in the same proud tradition as Frederick Douglass, Booker T. Washington, and yes, Martin Luther King. He's got the stuff. Bush should do it.

35 posted on 12/07/2002 12:26:53 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
This would be great! HA! The fema-nazis will go crazy.

They love a rapist but when Clarence mentions a porn star, they go mental!

The dude has been whipped by the left more than Jesus. He needs his due.

Hillary would tout Ginsberg... one hag to another.

Thomas, like Scalia, think and toss aside emotion. They are an anathema to the socialists.

37 posted on 12/07/2002 12:27:11 PM PST by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
FINALLY!! Bush "eyes" the exact appointment I had in mind.

Go for Thomas, Mr. President. Scalia's a great justice, but he's in his 60s. Thomas, on the other hand, is the only baby boomer on the court yet he's already had over a decade of solid experience on the S.C.-- the 'RATs can't claim he'd be a novice this time around.

Chief Justice Thomas could probably serve 20+ years, and give the liberals a heartache as they realize an intelligence black conservative has become the first "minority" to head one of three branches of government.

45 posted on 12/07/2002 12:36:50 PM PST by BillyBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
OMG, what a dilemma, how do you choose between them? This is a no lose choice for the people.
49 posted on 12/07/2002 12:40:50 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
Selecting Thomas would be brilliant. I love Scalia, but he is too old. Any time that Nina Totenburg and her cronies bring up anything about Sexual Harrassment, all the Pubbies have to do is yell "Clinton-Clinton-Clinton!" and publish some of the statements that they made in support of the Rapist in Chief.
50 posted on 12/07/2002 12:40:56 PM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing; JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 75thOVI; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; ...
Thomas or Scalia..... Thomas or Scalia....Thomas or Scalia.... tough decision.. but a win either way.. I would lean towards Scalia myself.. but Clarance Thomas would make a superb Cheief Justice as well... Tough choice Mr. President... My family will be in prayer for you.

FReegards,

David

53 posted on 12/07/2002 12:45:50 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
Who is that fat, black female pig that they drag out on some of the talk shows to be the token ultra-left winger? The one that said she hoped Thomas' wife would cook fatty foods for him so he'd have a heart attack? She defended Willie's filth and corruption no matter what the facts. Unfortunately, we'd never get them to release any of the news tapes (probably some technical reason) but I love to see her defend Willie again using the "it was only about sex" argument while atacking Thomas, alleging the same thing. Yep, fat black leftist sow!!
55 posted on 12/07/2002 12:46:43 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
**Good to get this done now so that the Dims can't appoint Bill Clinton as chief justice under Hilllary**

I just spewed coffee all over my keyboard on that. Give me a warning next time!
69 posted on 12/07/2002 1:26:30 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson