Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEMOCRATS REFUSE TO COUNT ALL THE VOTES
Rich Galen ^ | 11/27/02 | Rich Galen

Posted on 11/27/2002 10:59:10 AM PST by Greek

The new GOP staffers will read Mullings. They should be reading YOUR ad. Right Here! http://www.mullings.com/mullingsadv.doc

MULLINGS An American Cyber-Column

Remember the Maine!

Rich Galen Wednesday November 27, 2002

* One does not have to reach back very far in history to remember the hue and cry of the Democratic Party: COUNT ALL THE VOTES!

* Notwithstanding the fact that when just about every news organization on the planet actually counted the ballots, George W. Bush STILL won Florida, the Dems – to this very day – pretend they were cheated out of the Presidency because they weren’t permitted to COUNT ALL THE VOTES!

* Now, we come to Maine. Quiet, back-woodsy, yup-and-nope terse down-East Yankee Maine. Where lobsters were invented. Where there are two seasons: Fourth of July and Winter.

* Maine, where -- (Oh, Rich? We get it. Uncle Bill is already in his cups and the turkey is done. We have GOT to get to the point, here.)

* Right. The Maine State Senate is comprised of 35 members. Following all the counting there was one seat still in play: Democrat Chris Hall v. Republican Leslie Fossel.

* The Maine Senate is split 17-17. This one seat will decide control.

* The two candidates are nine votes apart: 8,893 for the Democrat; 8,884 for the Republican.

* According to the Portland Press-Herald there are still 44 ballots to be counted.

* The Democrats have refused to count any more votes and the state Supreme Court has ruled that, under state law, each legislative body has the responsibility to decide election disputes.

* Imagine, in 2002, a state Supreme Court adhering to established law? Haven’t these people ever heard of New Jersey?

* According to retiring Senate Republican Leader, Mary Small, the ballots have been examined, but NOT COUNTED. If they were to COUNT ALL THE VOTES, Fossel would win.

* Some examples of the disputes: - There are 11 ballots which were marked in blue or black pen, rather than in the required pencil. There is no other dispute over these ballots. They break for the Republican 8-3. Ballots which were marked with RED pen – but which broke evenly – were allowed. Fossel down 4.

- There are seven other ballots on which the voters circled or underlined their choices. The all-important intent of the voter is not in dispute. These break for the Republican 6-1. Fossel up 1.

- Two more ballots have stray (but not identifying) marks. 2-zip for the GOP. Fossel up 3.

- Assorted other dribs and drabs, according to Senator Small, would boost that total to five.

* But they will not be counted. THEY WILL NOT BE COUNTED!

* Where is the outrage? Where are the cheering, jeering crowds led by Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton? Where is Terry McAuliffe?

* Say, where IS Terry McAuliffe?

* The Democrat will be sworn in on December 4, and the Democrats will have an 18-17 majority.

* The Republicans will offer a resolution disputing the seating of the Democrat, which will lose 18-17 with the disputed Senator voting for himself.

* The President of the Senate will appoint a task force to look into the election. It will have one more Democrat than Republican. It will decide the election is fair and final. But it will not COUNT ALL THE VOTES.

* In 1984 there was an infamous case of a contested Congressional election in Indiana’s Eighth District. The Republican won on election day by 34 votes. The Democrats, who already had a 71-seat majority, refused to seat the Republican, appointed a task force (2- 1 Democratic), and conducted a recount which lasted until the Democrat got ahead. The Democrats then stopped counting and declared the election over. _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________

* It was that act which legitimized the claim of a young, firebrand, back-bencher from Georgia, Newt Gingrich that the Democrats – who had controlled the U.S. House for three decades – were nothing short of a band of thugs.

* That power play by the Democrats was the shot heard ‘round the Capitol. Four years later Gingrich was elected Republican Whip five years after that he was Speaker.

* Senator Small said what the Democrats were doing was “unethical and immoral, but probably not illegal.”

* So, if you ever think the GOP is being unfair to the Democrats in Congress: Remember the Maine.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Avoiding_Sulla
Who are they?

41 posted on 11/27/2002 8:35:49 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Waco
No.
42 posted on 11/27/2002 8:39:03 PM PST by Budge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
When Snowe and COllins retire ....Rats will be the next Senators from ME.

Why? Because Republican leaders gave up before the race ever started? I'm sick of that.

This is exactly the kind of scandal (the stealing of the Maine Senate by corrupt and hypocritical RATS) which has the potential to begin the process of waking up Mainers to why they need a change in leadership up there.

43 posted on 11/27/2002 8:39:44 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Dream on, this will never be seen on the mainstream media outlets!!!
44 posted on 11/27/2002 8:45:01 PM PST by Terridan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Terridan
What, you mean they are biased?
45 posted on 11/27/2002 9:03:29 PM PST by FreedomCalls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Who are they?

Their fellow Maine legislators will know. We'd only get wind of it if something happened there like what happened in CA, once in 1995 and then again in 1996. The 1994 election swept both houses of CA into GOP hands, but the GOP only had a one vote margin in the assembly.

Willie Brown engineered it so that one pubbie gave his vote to the Dems to give them the majority. That pubbie assyman was easily recalled, but, following procedure, it took until spring of 1996 to do it.

Well the outrage was great, but the trouble obviously ran deeper. Because that swingback to a GOP controlled assembly never happened. Why? Because no sooner had the new pubbie been sworn in then ANOTHER pubbie played Benedict Arnold.

Who are they you ask? In a POGO sense, it's us. We keep electing candidates all over the country who could best be described as ruling-class clubbies. This is supposed to be a republic. We're seeing it morph into an aristocracy.

46 posted on 11/27/2002 9:28:31 PM PST by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
This is supposed to be a republic. We're seeing it morph into an aristocracy.

Hard to argue with that...and the aristocrats are quite contemptuous of the rule of law, eh?

47 posted on 11/27/2002 9:32:06 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Greek
Remember Their motto: "We're Democrats! Laws are for other people!"
48 posted on 11/27/2002 9:32:09 PM PST by Chairman Fred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
You betcha. And, you can also bet the aristocrats (modern day tories perhaps?) have their cheering section here at FR too.

Up until now, mostly DUhs, racists, and the more strident Libertarians have been banned. A good number of them deserve banning too, because their covert efforts make a mockery of FR. But then, again, we wouldn't be able to keep tabs on 'em and their tactics.

I've seen you take on the task of countering their demoralizing and despoiling efforts. Pretty good job too. May you continue to undermine their progress effectively.

49 posted on 11/27/2002 10:06:58 PM PST by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
Thanks. Sometimes I wonder if anyone notices or cares.

Have a great holiday, my friend...and may God richly bless you!
50 posted on 11/27/2002 10:24:22 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Is this true? Amazing if so.....
51 posted on 11/28/2002 1:25:36 AM PST by mtngrl@vrwc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: Clemenza; PARodrig; rmlew; Black Agnes
ping
53 posted on 11/28/2002 5:51:42 AM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson