Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge blocks Grazing on "Endangered Owl" Lands
Associated Press | Nov. 25, 2002 | Arther Rotstein

Posted on 11/26/2002 5:57:04 AM PST by Bodacious

Text | User Agreement | Privacy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Health & Science: Grazing temporarily blocked on endangered owl lands

Copyright © 2002 AP Online

Search the archive for: environment

By ARTHUR H. ROTSTEIN, Associated Press

TUCSON, Ariz. (November 25, 2002 10:42 p.m. EST) - A federal judge has issued an injunction that could temporarily ban cattle grazing on huge swaths of national forest land identified as nesting and foraging sites for the endangered Mexican spotted owl.

U.S. District Judge Raner Collins' order blocking grazing in areas of Arizona and New Mexico was signed Thursday in response to a lawsuit by environmental groups who want to remove cattle from spotted owl habitat.

The injunction is set to kick in Jan. 22. But it won't go into effect if the Forest Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service complete a new biological review before then, Collins said.

The last such review, which resulted in amended grazing standards set by the Forest Service in 1996, took a couple of years to complete, said Jim Angell, an attorney for Earthjustice, a nonprofit public interest law firm and a plaintiff in the lawsuit.

Those standards were designed to protect owl habitat and ensure its survival. Grazing threatens the owl by reducing its favorite prey, degrading streamside vegetation and slowing the growth of habitat favorable to the bird, environmentalists contend.

"Frankly, they may try to hurry this through so the time grazing is enjoined is shortened," Angell said Monday of the biological review. "My fear is they will try to rush this thing out as quickly as possible and, as a result, their analysis will be shoddy."

Collins didn't specify how many acres were included in the injunction, but Angell put the number at at least 200,000. Attorneys representing the Justice Department and the Arizona Cattle Growers Association didn't return calls seeking comment Monday.

Collins' injunction is the latest step in a long-running lawsuit over the owl habitat. Last month, he found that the Forest Service violated the Endangered Species Act by failing to prevent overgrazing on millions of acres of national forest in the two states.

The government or the Arizona Cattle Growers Association could appeal Collins' order. Art Morrison, a spokesman for the Forest Service's regional headquarters in Albuquerque, N.M., said officials haven't consulted with the Justice Department on the ruling yet.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Miscellaneous; US: Arizona; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: arizona; enviralists; enviroment; landgrab
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

1 posted on 11/26/2002 5:57:04 AM PST by Bodacious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bodacious

2 posted on 11/26/2002 6:02:07 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodacious
Gotta watch out for the darn grass eating owls. They need all the grass they can get. </sarcasm>
3 posted on 11/26/2002 6:02:42 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Owls rock!
4 posted on 11/26/2002 6:03:07 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bodacious
Wonder how much those ranchers pay for grazing rights relative to what they'd pay to rent land from another ranch?
5 posted on 11/26/2002 6:03:55 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodacious
As members of the Arizona Cattle Growers Association know, this is more of the same effort to get ranchers off the land. Totally wrong-headed to have the areas ecosystem planning revolve around the owl, as opposed to seeking a balance that doesn't place ranchers at a disadvantage.
6 posted on 11/26/2002 6:10:23 AM PST by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Stand Watch Listen; Libertarianize the GOP; freefly; 2sheep; ...
ping
7 posted on 11/26/2002 6:12:37 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodacious
The injunction is set to kick in Jan. 22. But it won't go into effect if the Forest Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service complete a new biological review before then, Collins said.

I guess the environmentally correct thing to do is to set up a 60-day deadline...........

The last such review, which resulted in amended grazing standards set by the Forest Service in 1996, took a couple of years to complete,.........

for a study that takes rather more than 60 days to complete.

"Frankly, they may try to hurry this through so the time grazing is enjoined is shortened," Angell said Monday of the biological review. "My fear is they will try to rush this thing out as quickly as possible and, as a result, their analysis will be shoddy."

Rather that afraid, Angell is salivating at the prospect. Even if the biological review is the most complete and highest quality ever, Angell will sue because of the reports "shoddines". This looks like another case of a judge with an agenda, setting up someone to be sued again and again.

8 posted on 11/26/2002 6:13:34 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Anyone have any good owl recipes?
9 posted on 11/26/2002 6:14:13 AM PST by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bodacious
Simply solved:

Catch the owls...........................deport them back to Mexico...........................resume grazing.

10 posted on 11/26/2002 6:18:36 AM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Watch and see how these rulings affect the cost of food. But then, as long as the owls are happy, to hell with the folks trying to survive in a less than robust economy.
11 posted on 11/26/2002 6:23:17 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bodacious
The way to deal with "so called" endangered species:

Shoot and Shovel
12 posted on 11/26/2002 6:23:37 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodacious
This story doesn't jibe at all with info from data at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mexican Spotted Owl Website

Habitat Associations

Mexican spotted owls nest, roost, forage, and disperse in a diverse assemblage of biotic communities. Mixed-conifer forests are commonly used throughout most of the range which may include Douglas-fir and/or white fir, with codominant species including southwestern white pine, limber pine, and ponderosa pine. The understory often contains the above coniferous species as well as broadleaved species such as Gambel oak, maples, box elder, and/or New Mexico locust. In southern Arizona and Mexico, Madrean pine-oak forests are also commonly used. These forests are tpically dominated by an overstory of Chihuahua and Apache pines (and probably other species in Mexico) in conjunction with species such as Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, and Arizona cypress. Evergreen oaks are typically prominent in the understory (Brown et al. 1980). In the northern part of the range, including southern Utah, southern Colorado, and far northern Arizona and New Mexico, owls occur primarily in rocky canyons (Kertell 1977, Reynolds 1990, Rinkevich 1991, Willey 1993).

Spotted owls nest and roost primarily in closed-canopy forests or rocky canyons. They nest in these areas on cliff ledges, in stick nests built by other birds, on debris platforms in trees, and in tree cavities. In southern Utah, Colorado, and some portions of northern New Mexico, most nests are in caves or on cliff ledges in rocky canyons. Elsewhere, they also use caves and cliffs, but the majority of nests appear to be in trees. Forests used for roosting and nesting often contain mature or old-growth stands with complex structure, are typically uneven-aged, multistoried, and have high canopy closure. A wider variety of trees are used for roosting, but again Douglas-fir is the most commonly used species.

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain why spotted owls typically nest in closed-canopy forests. One hypothesis suggests that spotted owls are relatively intolerant of high temperatures, and roost and nest in shady forests because they provide favorable microclimatic conditions (Barrows 1981). This could explain why owls typically nest in either closed-canopy forests or deep shady canyons, as both habitat types provide cool microclimates. Ganey et al. (1993) provided support for this hypothesis. They observed that metabolic rates were higher and rates of evaporative water loss lower in Mexican spotted owls than in sympatric great horned owls, a habitat generalist. Thus, spotted owls appeared to produce more metabolic heat than great horned owls, and were less able to dissipate that heat. This may lead them to seek out cool microclimates during the breeding season (Ganey et al. 1993).

Little is known about patterns of habitat use by foraging owls. The only available data describe habitat use by eight owls occupying five home ranges on three study areas in northern Arizona (Ganey and Balda 1994). In general, owls clearly foraged in a wider variety of forest conditions than they used for roosting.

Feeding Habits

Forsman (1976) described spotted owls as "perch and pounce" predators. They typically locate prey from an elevated perch by sight or sound, then pounce on the prey and capture it with their talons. Most information on the food habits of Mexican spotted owls comes from analyses of regurgitated pellets. Specific prey groups identified from spotted owl pellets included woodrats, mice, voles, rabbits, gophers, bats, birds, reptiles, and arthropods. The diet in most areas was heavily dominated by small, terrestrial, nocturnal mammals, but species composition varied among areas. Woodrats were generally more abundant in pellet samples collected from northern latitudes, and peromyscid mice and birds were generally more abundant in southern regions of the owl's range. Voles appear more common in the diet of owls dwelling at higher elevations.

13 posted on 11/26/2002 6:25:41 AM PST by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Most Americans manage to make their way in the world without having the federal government directly subsidize their economic activities like grazing or farming are propped up.

Let the market for land decide what the price of grazing rights will be.

14 posted on 11/26/2002 6:27:54 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
federal government directly subsidize their economic activities like grazing or farming

What if the ranchers owned the right to graze and paid BLM for an administration fee so that the government could assure that the use of the land was beneficial?
15 posted on 11/26/2002 6:39:16 AM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: madfly
BTTT!!!!!!!
16 posted on 11/26/2002 6:42:39 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
My father in Alabama routinely rents out his pasture to neighboring dairy farmers for graze. In Alabama, the bulk of available land is in private hands.

In Arizona, 17% of the available land is in private hands, the rest must be leased from the Federal Government. There is no market for land.

Next.
17 posted on 11/26/2002 6:43:15 AM PST by HiJinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch
I would then ask if those ranchers paid for that "ownership" of grazing rights - because if they didn't, the difference between private local grazing rates and BLM grazing rates is a direct subsidy.
18 posted on 11/26/2002 6:44:21 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
Your point? Why shouldn't the Feds get market rate for grazing rights? In the water sensitive area of the Southweat, was it really good policy to encourage people to overpopulate the area by subsidizing food and water by the use of public projects, subsidized water and subsidized grazing?
19 posted on 11/26/2002 6:46:56 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Gotta watch out for the darn grass eating owls. They need all the grass they can get.

I don't think it's that so much as it is those darn owl eating cows. I'll never forget the time, as a youth, when I first saw a cow in a tree with owl feathers plastered around it's muzzle. The next day I saw my first winged pig and shortly thereafter a monkey flew out my butt.
20 posted on 11/26/2002 6:47:56 AM PST by AD from SpringBay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson