Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chuknospam
It is in every law-abiding gun owner's interest to prevent nutjobs from walking in and buying a gun.
2 posted on 11/12/2002 5:12:19 PM PST by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel
It's in every free society's interest to prevent nutjob politicians from keeping tabs on who is and isn't armed.
3 posted on 11/12/2002 5:15:28 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
It is in every law-abiding gun owner's interest to prevent nutjobs from walking in and buying a gun.

Is it in the interest of anyone to have a database of all this information on American citizens in Washington? Maybe we can find other uses for such a database?
4 posted on 11/12/2002 5:15:31 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
BUMP
6 posted on 11/12/2002 5:25:01 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
It is in every law-abiding gun owner's interest to prevent nutjobs from walking in and buying a gun.

So you basically assert that anyone who has any psychological treatment at any time is automatically not a law-abiding gun owner, or potentially one.

I would rather every nut in the country were given a gun, and all guns taken away from any member of the government or citizenry who takes part, at any level, in the disarming American Citizens, as you are for advocating it.

What is it you intend to do to these disarmed Americans?

Hank

7 posted on 11/12/2002 5:25:44 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
These clowns define anybody who wants to own a gun as a nutjob. No thanks. Anybody who wants a gun should have the right to buy one - no questions asked. That would at least put the rest of us on the same footing as the bad guys.
12 posted on 11/12/2002 5:31:32 PM PST by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
It is in every law-abiding gun owner's interest to prevent nutjobs from walking in and buying a gun.

mvpel, You are hereby declared to be a "nutjob". Hand in your guns -- now!

How would you defend yourself against that accusation?

TXnMA (No Longer!!!)

15 posted on 11/12/2002 5:33:52 PM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
"It is in every law-abiding gun owner's interest to prevent nutjobs from walking in and buying a gun."

Who defines 'nutjobs? Did you know that any veteran who ever filled out a form at a veteran's hospital and complained of stress caused by any reason will no doubt be classed as a 'nutjob' once their medical records become part of this proposed data base? There will be few veterans who will not be dis-armed. I ask again, who defines what a 'nutjob' is? How would you define 'nutjob?' If you're a vet, be wary of answering casual and suggestive questions if you ever visit the V.A.

I busted my butt getting to the VA in time for my appointment last year and the trip made my blood pressure go up a few points. The nurse commented about it, and I explained that my blood pressure is usually much lower, but that I've been driving for 40 minutes in rough traffic trying to get here on time and I was probably stressed out. Anyone who is late for a VA appointment knows they will wait another month for another one. The nurse turned her head, looked at me sidewise like I was some kind of a 'nutjob' and wrote down my comment, asking if I usually get stressed when I drive.? I looked at her like she was stupid and said, 'Hell, don't you?' I believe she wrote that down too.

There were other questions she asked relating to stress, reading from what must have been a special form, as I was never asked those questions before. Yeah. I'm paranoid. This form came out about the same time news broke about what was included in the Bill when it was written.

I can easily picture what will happen if this Bill becomes law. Especially since all medical records will become part of the data base. They won't have to ban guns. Few will be qualified to buy them. Punch a name into a computer, up comes a psychological profile along with a list of medications taken by the would-be gun buyer. You can bet that the use of any mood-altering or stress-relieving or chemical-balancing prescription medicines will dis-qualify the buyer, having been classified as, in your words, a 'nutjob.'

I would rather have a well-armed 'nut-job' at my side if push ever came to shove anyway. Certifiable psychos are able to get weapons regardless of laws, so why this 'nut-job' law?

22 posted on 11/12/2002 5:59:56 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
Define "nutjob."

Then wonder to yourself how that definition can be expanded upon.

29 posted on 11/12/2002 6:14:26 PM PST by dbwz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
From my cold dead hands!

This statement could make some people think that you're a nutjob.

Never get stuck in a building when they come for your guns, instead get them stuck in a building.
32 posted on 11/12/2002 6:24:41 PM PST by Crusader21stCentury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
How funny you should mention that, because while in DC last weekend I had lunch with a staffer and he invited a democr@p staffer that said everyone at FR were a bunch of...nutjobs. So, watch the stroke with which you broadly paint people's Constitutional rights and whom you ally yourself with.
37 posted on 11/12/2002 6:38:20 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
"It is in every law-abiding gun owner's interest to prevent nutjobs from walking in and buying a gun."

Not everyone who winds up in a private mental health institution is a nutjob. Some of them are chronically depressed and sometimes suicidal kids who are fine once their problems are resolved. Sometimes, an adult has a nervous breakdown and checks his or herself in.

That's no reason for either not to own a gun. Heck...how do we know that every person who ever went for therapy for whatever reason...even marriage counciling, won't be denied a gun?? Anything Chucky Schumer is involved in CAN'T be inthe best interests of the people.

38 posted on 11/12/2002 6:38:43 PM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
"It is in every law-abiding gun owner's interest to prevent nutjobs from walking in and buying a gun. "

Nice thought, but unfortunatly in this day and age if you want to own a gun, that is enough to clasify you as a nutjob.

55 posted on 11/13/2002 6:10:31 AM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
It's been more than 12 hours. Aren't you going to respond to all these people that challenged your bonehead statement?

57 posted on 11/13/2002 6:45:32 AM PST by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel
This bill may mean that gun-owners who are suffering from depression will be unlikely to visit a shrink.

Personally, I think that talking it over with your bartender might just work out better...

68 posted on 11/13/2002 10:42:44 AM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson