Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[ACTIVISM] The Next Agenda Item For Free Republic
Self | November 7, 2002 | Self

Posted on 11/07/2002 6:25:30 AM PST by Illbay

The focus for FReepers in the election cycle just concluded was to take back the Senate. 77% of FReeperdom opined that this was "critical."

This has now occurred, and congratulations are in order.

Now, we have to reset the agenda. Of course, there are many agenda items already set, such as homeland security, confirmation of judges, making tax cuts permanent, passing a budget, etc. And before we know it, the 2004 election cycle will be upon us.

But before ANY of that can take place, I submit there is one item that is MOST important, before all of those.

The Senate is ours, but only just. One less Senator, and we'd be back to "parity," with Mr. Cheney representing the tie breaking vote--and we all remember where that led.

The new majority leader is likely to be the OLD majority leader, Trent Lott of Mississippi. It should come as a surprise to few here on FR that Sen. Lott has a very, very small coterie of admirers here. In short, we consider him basically spineless, and far too accomodating to the Democrats, not to mention "moderates" and RINOS such as McCain, Snow, Chaffee and others.

When the Senate proceeds with its business next year, the Dems will have had months to recover from their defeat. If the past is any indication, they will come back swinging, under the assumption that "stupid people" elected Republicans, and any "mandate" from "stupid people" can be ignored. This is precisely what happened after 1994--when the shift that gave the entire Congress to the Republicans was far more dramatic than this year--and by the next year (with Boy Clinton's help) they had painted the Pubbies into a corner. I don't believe the Republicans have EVER really taken the initiative as a result.

It's time to help our Republican Senators, in particular, to see that you cannot accomodate Democrats. They don't accomodate; they see any attempt to "reach out" to them as weakness, and they take full advantage.

After the 2000 election, even though the Dems were still in the minority, they took advantage immediately to demand "power sharing." Mr. Lott, of course, was quick to accomodate them, and the result was that a few months later they were calling Tom Daschle "Majority Leader."

This time, it can't happen. Democrats have to be kept on the defensive, and off balance. Things are far too critical now. Beside the war on terrorism, we have judges to confirm, and much critical legislation to pass. We have no time for Democrat shenanigans.

But we KNOW those shenanigans are going to occur. Believe me, it's NOT going to take long for the Dems to rally. They are infallibly convinced of their own superiority. They are willing to stop at nothing to get their way.

I propose that we begin discussions on how we can help Mr. Lott, for one, grow a spine. He and the Republican Senate leadership need help from loyal conservatives to see the evil that they face (you'd think they could see it for themselves, but they continue to surprise me).

This, to me, is JOB NO. 1 for Free Republic at this time. I'd like to solicit ideas on how to accomplish this. FR has proven to be a great voice for responsible government. This task is tailor-made for us.

FReegards to all.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Free Republic; Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: Sidebar Moderator
VANITY
21 posted on 11/07/2002 6:53:53 AM PST by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Ditto ~~ **Bump**
22 posted on 11/07/2002 6:56:04 AM PST by TwoStep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dinasour
ROTFLMAO!!!!
23 posted on 11/07/2002 6:57:20 AM PST by cibco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: txzman
When the Dims start promising a chicken in every pot from the cradle to the grave, everything can/will come unraveled before 2004.

The vast majority does not want to take responsibility for their own lives.....we'll always be the underdog..

24 posted on 11/07/2002 6:59:21 AM PST by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Hey, thread pest!

"Another Vanity on Vanities" by Jim Robinson

"Please help us improve the news to noise ratio - post your rant as a reply rather than a vanity post" by Jim Robinson

"Vanity: Please help prevent the vanity explosion" by Jim Robinson

25 posted on 11/07/2002 7:05:46 AM PST by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
A Vanity post by Illbay? Has the world come to an end?!

Anyway ... he's right. This is a task tailor-made for us. One thing we could do is bombard Trent's inbox (snail mail and e-mail) expressing our concerns about his lack of spine.

The other thing is to bombard the inbox of any Senator we believe has the muscle to stand up to the Democrats and hold on against the Press attacks.

I therefore present these three choices:
Senator MITCH MCCONNELL (R-KY)
Senator LARRY CRAIG (R-ID)
Senator RICK SANTORUM (R-PA)

26 posted on 11/07/2002 7:06:34 AM PST by MAKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage
Obviously there is the hoi poloi that has to be kept under close wraps and be disciplined, and then there are the elite, whose vanities aren't really vanities at all, but a vital part of the discourse. You know who you are. From a card-carrying member of the hoi poloi.
27 posted on 11/07/2002 7:12:53 AM PST by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: donozark; Alamo-Girl
The problem is that there is no one willing to step up and challenge Lott. He's there, and we have to deal with him. The question is, how do we help motivate the Republican leadership, given that he's the top dog--er--chihuahua?

It brings me in mind of the claims by many FReepers that the barrage of information that came to be known as the DSL ("Degrees of Separation List") that was sent at great expense to every Senator during the Clinton Impeachment trial by FR activists, though it didn't result in the thug's impeachment, nevertheless swayed many Senators to vote for his ouster.

I have always been skeptical, but FR is first and foremost a place for Activism (hence this LEGAL VANITY post!) and it seems to me that Mr. Lott needs to hear early and often, that he is not there to play "nice" with Tom Daschle.

I know we're not supposed to "gloat," according to our President, but we have a lot of crucial things that need to be done. Those efforts are going to be seriously hamstrung if Trent Lott attempts to "reach out" to the vanquished Democrats.

We worked hard to defeat them. But our own defeat can be snatched from the jaws of that victory by our own "leaders," such as Trent Lott.

We haven't had him to kick around much; now we have to deal with him.

He is the Weakest Link, and there's no getting around that. This d*mned "collegiality" that we're always hearing exists in the Senate ONLY seems to work one way, and we're here to remind them of that as often as we can.

So, Ideas?


28 posted on 11/07/2002 7:15:03 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: donozark
Lince Lott was nver in the military, I would compare him to a coach who doesn't play to win but instead "not to lose" when the game is close. That type of timidity as often as not results in a loss for the home team.
29 posted on 11/07/2002 7:15:50 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
Pelosi is irrelevant. She is going to be a barking chihuahua. It is the SENATE that we need to be concerned about.

Trent Lott is OUR chihuahua--even when he has the majority.

Now he has an insurmountable majority, AND the White House to help him with his missing cojones.

We have to go under the assumption that he is going to be there, and we're going to have to deal with him. Despite all the speculation about who could succeed him, no one will. No one is challenging him, and we have to deal WITH LOTT.

ATTENTION: SPECULATION ABOUT WHO COULD SUCCEED LOTT IS IRRELEVANT. ASSUME HE IS THERE TO STAY, AS HE MOST SURELY IS. HOW DO WE GIVE THIS GUY A SPINE?


30 posted on 11/07/2002 7:18:26 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Yes, this is EXACTLY the type of post that belongs here. Perhaps we can pray that Lott has learned from his "power sharing" mistakes and let the Rats know that their opinions will be respected and considered, but the Republicans will firmly retain control.
31 posted on 11/07/2002 7:19:55 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MAKnight
Now you're talking. So what you're saying is, we might effectively influence Mr. Lott through his Republican colleagues that we firmly believe will not kow-tow to Tom Daschle in the name of "getting along."

GREAT IDEA.


32 posted on 11/07/2002 7:21:38 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

PRAYER IS GOOD

However, the Lord helps those who help themselves. I share your hope that Mr. Lott has learned from the recent past, but it wouldn't hurt for us to remind him.

What would you tell Trent Lott if you had 5 minutes alone with him?


33 posted on 11/07/2002 7:23:42 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I think his wife summed it up when she told him Wed. morning - ok big dog, you've been chasing this car for 2 years what are you going to do now that you've caught it? He related this story on one of the news shows he was on yesterday morning.
34 posted on 11/07/2002 7:28:28 AM PST by Clintons Are White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I would suggest that Job 1 for conservatives is to resist the urge to turn to internal bickering. Let's save that for after we get up to 60 Senators. Let's leave the self-immolation for the Democrats.

Our job #1 right now should be the defeat of Brown Roots.

After that, job #2 should be identifying and building grassroots networks for solid conservative candidates for 2003's few elections and for 2004's complete slate of elections.

The idea is NOT to get the slimmest of majorities and then start internal catfighting. Save that for where our own internal battles, and the wounds they cause, won't endanger our tenuous hold on the reigns of government.

35 posted on 11/07/2002 7:31:26 AM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay; dinasour; DainBramage; MrB; petuniasevan
Ditto to what you all "quoted," lol.

Or how about this quote from Illbay on another "vanity" post: "How about "follow the rules of the forum?"

You've lost your argument, Illbay, unless, of course, the "rules" don't apply to YOU.

36 posted on 11/07/2002 7:32:52 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SouthernFreebird
Thank you.
37 posted on 11/07/2002 7:33:17 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I have always been skeptical, but FR is first and foremost a place for Activism (hence this LEGAL VANITY post!)

In Breaking News? Illbay, this is another reason why you ain't the person to be leading the charge on the proliferation of vanity posts - and there are plenty of ongoing threads on this general subject where you could have placed it. Throw in your flame-bait vanity from a short ways back, and your tendency to get abusive, and you're one of the leading offenders against FR posting rules.

38 posted on 11/07/2002 7:36:51 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
The next agenda item for FR should be to help Skooz pay off his student loan.

Pass the hat, please. Thanks.

39 posted on 11/07/2002 7:37:39 AM PST by Skooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; billbears; stainlessbanner
You've lost your argument, Illbay, unless, of course, the "rules" don't apply to YOU.

Perhaps he thought that some animals are more equal than others?

I guess they aren't... the article was pulled from Breaking News.
Hoist with his own petard... oh, the cruel irony!

40 posted on 11/07/2002 7:40:06 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson