Skip to comments.
California Election Results
self ^
| 11-6-02
| Bones McCoy
Posted on 11/06/2002 6:35:44 AM PST by bonesmccoy
California Election results for governor
It appears to me that the GOP is consistently losing the statewide offices because of voting in three counties. Virtually the entire state went for Simon with the exception of Oakland, San Francisco, and Los Angeles counties.
__________________________________________________
1998 results
From the standpoint of the number of counties taken, Simon did better than Lungren (though the popular vote was much different).
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; davis; gop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-213 next last
To: bonesmccoy; diotima; TheRightGuy; usconservative; BillyBoy; spintreebob
It appears to me that the GOP is consistently losing the statewide offices because of voting in three counties. Welcome to my world... I feel your pain... :o)
41
posted on
11/06/2002 7:26:29 AM PST
by
RedWing9
To: BibChr
(little Greek humor, there)
Wanna bet? :-)
42
posted on
11/06/2002 7:28:00 AM PST
by
Valin
To: rightwing2
Actually, this result my put CA back in play.
Simon ran a hideous campaign, we all knew that. He also was underfunded. We knew that as well.
I strongly believe that Bush is stronger among Latinos than Simon was, who operated on the periphery of the Latino community. I think that a well funded (oh, say, perhaps 250 million dollars would be nice) Bush campaign could start working California to make it competitive and to drive down the Dem share of the Latino vote.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
43
posted on
11/06/2002 7:28:03 AM PST
by
section9
To: bonesmccoy
Sad for Kalifornia. But good for the nearby States as businesses will continue to relocate in large numbers.
44
posted on
11/06/2002 7:29:07 AM PST
by
Seruzawa
To: Dog Gone
Yes, I was beginning to think the same way... though I hope our families will be around in 2006. Actually, I really believe that the Dems are attempting to flush all conservatives from the state.
You can see what's happening by looking at the demographics and voter reg is high growth areas of the state. The GOP families are literally fleeing to certain areas because of the influx of foreign companies and interests into certain areas.
This trend is dangerous for our immediate future and needs to be neutralized through economic action (i.e. control of chambers of commerce, development of new entrepreneurs, and capitalization of conservative companies).
The impact of the tech bubble is echoing in this election. You can see it visually on the map. The tech companies are sitting in every green county. Every red county has actual bricks and mortar investments and actual services to the population (and not .com bust out fraud).
Since there are no GOP reps in statewide office, the abuses are going to get worse. The only way it will change is if the federal justice department can defend our interests.
To: Munson
We will have to get Brulte I'm talking about Brulte.
To: RedWing9
More of the same for me...LOL.
47
posted on
11/06/2002 7:31:03 AM PST
by
diotima
To: bonesmccoy
IN Tucson, we just opened up a Second Headquarters in the heart of the barrio. We WILL get our message out. We have been attending Latino events. Our Republican Party bought 3 tables at the last Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Dinner. A few of their board members were at our party last evening.
It will take time. Establish a Republican presence in their communities, and they will come.
To: Seruzawa
Well, you can't run to Oregon or Washington.
You could think about Arizona or Nevada...but neither are very hospitable (in terms of weather).
We shouldn't run. These people are carpet bagging newcomers. Our families have been here for 100+ years.
Dammit. This is MY state and MY town.
Not theirs.
To: bonesmccoy
Re#10 Yep. The ads did what they were supposed to. That and the presstitutes convenient silence on Simon's messages on the issues. I hope the Rats and Clymers get their comeuppance here one day...
50
posted on
11/06/2002 7:34:17 AM PST
by
eureka!
To: tallhappy
CA GOP is pathetic. They are incompetents. --- They've been going down hill fast from there.Well - Ca voters reached the low point. That is if voter fraud wasn't involved ??????
There are several small businesses from Ca that are going to relocate to another state-- Nice going Ca. GOP - those of you that didn't vote --- SHAME ON YOU!!!!
Comment #52 Removed by Moderator
To: chadsworth
At this point, given the horrible state of finances in Sac, you'd have to be naive or ignorant NOT to evaluate relocating major accounts outside of California.
At this point, it looks like Hawaii or Nevada are the two biggest options.
To: rightwing2
It hurts to lose this election, but thanks to Bones's map, I see a lot of good news.
You mention the liberal RAT owned media rags and their role in defeating Simon.
If every conservative as of today cancelled his/her subscription to these liberal RAT owned media rags and worked to get his friends and family members in Kali to do the same. By 2002, some of those liberal RAT owned media rags will be in real trouble. The LA Slimes and most of them are hurting due to decreasing ad $'s which will get worse as the Davis Watermelon Rats continue to tax and spend more as the state roars into even more bankruptcy.
If every mad Repubi, this morning cancelled their subscriptions to these Liberal RAT owned media rags, we will start to really smash the Rat media.
To: eureka!
Ya know, Simon doesn't realize it now. But losing this race is a blessing in disguise. Whoever would have won this election wouold have had almighty hell to pay for the next four years. The economy in CA is in total disarray and because of the incompetence of the Dimwit for the past four years this state will likely be a financial nightmare the next four years.
55
posted on
11/06/2002 7:38:44 AM PST
by
kellynla
To: Valin
I wonder if it is possible to pass a California proposition to FORCE the candidates to have debates?
To: Grampa Dave
Thanks for the kind words. We've got to re-evaluate the mix for 2004's election cycle. The rat race in the Cerritos area has changed. With Loretta's sister gaining the seat, it alters the situation there.
To: bonesmccoy; Carry_Okie
The CA GOP fed the Bush campaign polling data to show the race in CA was actually close. This impacts how a campaign is planned and how finances are allocated.
They caused the Bush campaign to waste time and money in a gone state by passing bogus info that the state was close enough to win.
To: Macross Jem
How do you figure that? I think Davis is more than positioned to do the Presidential run. The guy cornered nearly 70 million dollars in union, casino, lawyer, and movie mogul donations. What else is there to know.
The primary is going to be Al Gore v. Hillary Clinton v. Gray Davis. When's the California primary?
To: eureka!; kellynla; NormsRevenge; Saundra Duffy; Gophack; ElkGroveDan
Grampa Dave just beat me to it, but I want to thank each of you for the hard work and inspiration over these past few months. You often faced a lot of adversity from those here who should have been supporting you but instead chose to criticize and berate. Yet you persevered and demonstrated that Simon could indeed give Davis a run. He did not win by 10-14 points as the media and the Davis camp kept telling us he would. And if so many conservatives and Pubbies hadn't given up so prematurely, who knows what could have happened? But you can still be proud of your efforts!
60
posted on
11/06/2002 7:43:03 AM PST
by
Coop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-213 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson