Posted on 11/03/2002 9:01:54 AM PST by Ed_in_LA
Minn: Mondale 50% Coleman 45%
TX: Kirk 48% Cornyn 49%
NJ: Lautenberg 54% Forrester 38%
Ark: Pryor 51% 40%
SD: Johnson 52% Thune 47%
GA: Cleland 49% Chambliss 49%
CO: Strickland 53% Allard 44%
NC: Bowles 46% Dole 52%
FL Gov: McBride 42% Bush 57%
IIRC, one of the comments by Flyer on the thread I linked was he was not allowed any recording devices in the polling area. Interesting, no? You may not have noticed the effect he had as a poll watcher; it hardly slowed the Dims down. FWIW...
It's possible that the Pubbies are less than gung ho to pursue Dim shenanigans because of their own skeletons??? I can't imagine the Pubbies could hold a candle to Dim corruption in any case, but for some reason Pubbies seem reluctant to give voter fraud much more than lip service. Hard to figger???
FGS
Are you sure you are not thinking of his brother who heads an arab "anti-defamation" group. The only time I have seen the polster talk about the mideast was in reference to a poll he did on attitudes towards the US among middle class arabs in the mideast.
It's funny that with all that work the polls show Sanchez doing worse than Kirk. Strange things happening but I don't see either race being that close.
Oh please!...POA...oh yeah...they're the people that told us bush would win popular vote in 2000 by 10 percent....I would not pay any attention to that guy.
Zatso? Surprise! Last I heard, Fox was reporting Cornyn with a fairly comfortable lead. Who're you watching, ABCCBSNBCNN???
FGS
And so do most reputable polsters. If you arent better than "fair" you are toast.
I don't suppose you'd like to back up that ridiculous statement with some facts would you? Nah, probably not.
FGS
The FL call was the result of some bad timing on the media's part and a mistake by VNS in precincts that were sampled/used for the projections. Also the media took some raw data from FL and went with it before VNS corrected it or so the story goes.
Novak said last night the thought Gov. Bush would win and maybe by double digits....
I hope Im wrong but the DEms have had major GOTV campaigns in the last two off year elections which have left the GOP surprised, losing races they thought they had in the bag. The AFL-CIO is suppposely putting more resources behind candidates in this race than in the previous years. Perhaps Zogby is taking this high turnout for Dems into account in his poll numbers. His prediction in Texas fits with some of the Dems are saying about their GOTV program there.
Kirk has done better, but he's made some mistakes, too. It cost him the lead, right at the time Cornyn finally started buying TV ads. He's done better than I predicted, but he can't successfully run as Republican-Lite in this state. We'll vote for the real thing.
Really? Zogby called 8 of 11 states within a one-tail margin of error in 2000.
This is the guy who uses a "fair" category on a poll as a negative to make Bush look bad
Was this a change from how he polled in the Clinton years?
Predicted Florida & Wisconsin wrong
Polls aren't predictions. Zogby called both of these races well within the margin of error.
Last night on Capital Gang, Novak said Republican sources where telling him that the race had tightened and that there was chance that Ryan might pull an upset.
Texas (Open) Toss Up | ||||
Poll
|
Date
|
Cornyn (R)
|
Kirk (D)
|
Spread
|
Zogby
|
10/31-11/2
|
49%
|
48%
|
GOP +1
|
10/29-11/1
|
50%
|
41%
|
GOP +9
|
|
10/29-11/1
|
53%
|
45%
|
GOP +8
|
|
10/7-10/29
|
44%
|
35%
|
GOP +9
|
|
10/21-10/27
|
43%
|
40%
|
GOP +3
|
|
10/21-10/23
|
52%
|
45%
|
GOP +7
|
|
10/15-10/20
|
46%
|
36%
|
GOP +10
|
|
10/13-10/17
|
47%
|
37%
|
GOP +10
|
|
10/14-10/16
|
54%
|
42%
|
GOP +12
|
|
10/8-10/13
|
46%
|
36%
|
GOP +10
|
|
Zogby
|
10/9-10/11
|
45%
|
37%
|
GOP +8
|
Last 3 Polls
|
Average
|
50.7%
|
44.7
|
GOP +6.0
|
Which poll is right? Zogby showing this race a dead heat or the Dallas Morning News with Cornyn comfortably ahead? We suspect Zogby's one point lead for Cornyn is closer to the truth. But we don't think Kirk will win on Tuesday. Cornyn 50% - Kirk 48%.
Is this John Zogby, the pollster, or his brother James, the pro-Arab Clinton-Gore suckup ?
That is exactly how they described it on Meet the Press this morning, when discussing the results.
FGS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.