Skip to comments.
Rush: Minnesota is now a dead heat again
Rush Limbaugh
| Nov 1, 2002
Posted on 11/01/2002 10:33:20 AM PST by John Jorsett
Rush has just reported on his show that internal Republican polling now shows Minnesota to be a statistical dead heat once again, Mondale having dropped 7 points. He cites the Democrat funerally (my borrowed term from another talk show) for Wellstone as one reason, particular among independent voters who were turned off by the tone of the event and Ventura's walking out.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: McGruff
Bill to Fritz: Your daughter is SPICY.
Trajan88
21
posted on
11/01/2002 10:41:38 AM PST
by
Trajan88
To: John Jorsett
Don't get excited. If Coleman wins, there will immediately be 4 lawsuits contesting the election.
22
posted on
11/01/2002 10:41:46 AM PST
by
SGCOS
To: John Jorsett
Rush has just reported on his show that internal Republican polling now shows Minnesota to be a statistical dead heat once again, Mondale having dropped 7 points. I'm not sure what this means. Mondale was never 7 points ahead in internal Republican tracking polls. A Star-Tribune poll reported Mondale ahead by 8, but that poll was demonstrated to have oversampled Democrats. INternal Republican polls had Mondale up by 2.
If Mondale has dropped 7 from what the Republican internal polls reported initially, that means Coleman is up by 5, and we're seeing some real movement. If he "dropped" only by comparing the Star Trib results to the Republican internal poll results, we may be seeing no movement at all, since the new internal poll results are within the margin of error of the previous poll.
To: colorado tanker
I sort of like Pep Rally for Death title,,Lucianne coined it.
To: aristeides
Good post, and you are right. Rest assured that Coleman is receiving and deploying excellent political judgment from Karl Rove and the NRSC.
Coleman is with Cheney today; Saturday with Laura Bush; Sunday with the President; and Monday with Rudy Guiliani. Heavy hitters.
25
posted on
11/01/2002 10:42:15 AM PST
by
mwl1
To: frmrda
Landrieu at 45(LA) - enough for runoffIs the thinking that Landrieu will lose if she's forced into a runoff?
To: aristeides
if he's smart, If he doesn't, ad he loses his consultants should be banned from party work for life.
27
posted on
11/01/2002 10:43:41 AM PST
by
hobbes1
To: Spunky
Correction: I just heard it again.
'WE WILL TAX THEIR BUTTS ASS OFF."
28
posted on
11/01/2002 10:44:21 AM PST
by
Spunky
To: John Jorsett
Is the thinking that Landrieu will lose if she's forced into a runoff? Sort of. She will have blown her wad, on the Race, plus Campaign Finance Kicks in after election day, and she will be forced to compete on Hard Money terms, a tough call for any democrat.
29
posted on
11/01/2002 10:44:50 AM PST
by
hobbes1
To: John Jorsett
A good shot she could lose. That runoff could decide balance of power and Racicot has said if that is the case the GOP will pour between $30-$40 million in there in a month.
Also, LA is a Bush state, and the whole focus of the campaign run-off could be the national implications, which would favor the GOP
30
posted on
11/01/2002 10:45:00 AM PST
by
frmrda
To: John Jorsett
A debate plus a Bush visit ought to nail it then.
To: John Jorsett
yep, that is the thinking but I doubt it.
To: All
Also from Rush's show:
Wednesday morning Coleman's campaign had 25 and 50 dollar donations coming in so fast they couldn't keep up with it.
Thanks again Bill, Hill and Terry and keep up the good work.
33
posted on
11/01/2002 10:45:42 AM PST
by
McGruff
To: Mad Dawgg
If I was Fritz I would go lite on the Air Travel till after the election. If I were Fritz I would be VERY careful not to travel by air AFTER the election if he wins. The Dims would have no hesitations ofting him so that the governor could appoint (annoint) someone of their choosing ... (Bubba ???)
To: John Jorsett
Is the thinking that Landrieu will lose if she's forced into a runoff? The thinking is "anything can happen" if she's forced into a runoff. A runoff would be a low turnout affair in December.
35
posted on
11/01/2002 10:46:01 AM PST
by
ambrose
To: clamper1797
Same advise to Lautenberg
To: Snuffington
I'm not sure what this means. Mondale was never 7 points ahead in internal Republican tracking polls. A Star-Tribune poll reported Mondale ahead by 8, but that poll was demonstrated to have oversampled Democrats. INternal Republican polls had Mondale up by 2.Perhaps Rush misphrased what the poll is saying, then. Could be that he meant that Mondale had shifted in relation to Coleman by 7. Or could there have been a different internal poll with a wider gap at some point?
To: frmrda
The only problem with Republican internal polls is that they might just be propaganda. I'm hoping that they are accurate, but if all of these internal polls are accurate, how come Republican polls always come out in favor of us and Dem internal polls always come out in favor of Dems?
38
posted on
11/01/2002 10:46:49 AM PST
by
mrs9x
To: ForOurFuture
I loved the photo of him standing tall and full salute!
To: John Jorsett
Coleman's not within the margin of fraud. Will be an interesting election night.
40
posted on
11/01/2002 10:48:45 AM PST
by
chnsmok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-160 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson