We need poll watchers and challengers. If you are interested, please vote absentee, and then contact the State GOP at 1-866-MIGOP-02.
To: Dan from Michigan
And bring a camera with you to snap pictures of the van drivers, and lawyers herding the "base" into the precincts.
2 posted on
10/29/2002 6:49:15 AM PST by
mgc1122
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
ping
To: Dan from Michigan
Maybe the reason why so many dead people vote is because election day is only a week away from Holloween. :P
The fix is in. Create a confused atmosphere so you can mold it into a favorable outcome through litigation.
6 posted on
10/29/2002 7:08:30 AM PST by
rudypoot
To: Dan from Michigan; All
7 posted on
10/29/2002 7:16:30 AM PST by
backhoe
To: Dan from Michigan
Out dated and wholly inaccurate voter registrations are a big problem all over the country. In Durham NC (the city and the county) there are more registered voters than there are adults over the age of 18 residing there.
But even attempt to clean them up and the ACLU and the NAALCP swoops in and cries racism and 'civil rights!'
To: Dan from Michigan
IT'S 7 DAYS UNTIL THE ELECTION. WILL IT STILL BE HER SENATE?
GOOD INTENTIONS DON'T WIN ELECTIONS.
ACTION DOES. ACT TODAY.
TakeBackCongress.org
A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate
9 posted on
10/29/2002 7:40:24 AM PST by
ffrancone
To: Dan from Michigan
Hmmmm...Voter turnout of 150% DOES sound a bit high, don't you think?
To: Dan from Michigan
With the 2000 U.S. Census recording the city as having a population of 655,561 people of voting age, Williams' count would mean that 93 percent of the city's residents who can vote are registered. When you count in those (felons, etc) that cannot vote, it probably means 100+% are registered.
13 posted on
10/29/2002 7:54:04 AM PST by
cinFLA
To: Dan from Michigan
But...but...how can this be?!
14 posted on
10/29/2002 7:56:06 AM PST by
CaptRon
To: Dan from Michigan
One simple solution would be to have a law that removes a person from the rolls if they did not vote in the previous election.
Yes, that means you would need to re-register if you missed an election.
The second reform would be to require ID to vote. I have no problem showing my Id to vote, especially if it cuts down on voter fraud.
This may not eliminate voter fraud, but there is no reason to make it easy for the crooks.
To: Dan from Michigan
great article, thanks for posting it
18 posted on
10/29/2002 8:37:12 AM PST by
Gothmog
To: Dan from Michigan
The Stupid Party strikes again. Vote fraud is a big problem in Michigan and I believe it cost Michigan a US Senate seat (Spence Abrahams) and cost Bush Michigan, when a huge number of votes came in from Wayne County (Detroit) late on election night.
They could've struck while the iron was hot after the Florida 2000 debacle to set up a secure, fraud-free voting system. But nooooo! They're afraid of confronting the Mafia, oops, Democrats.
To: Dan from Michigan
Duh,did anybody see Carter's campaign advisor( I forgot his name(over 40 moment)) question the 200k plurality in Detroit on Chris Matthews election night 2000?
20 posted on
10/29/2002 9:25:45 AM PST by
CPT Clay
To: Dan from Michigan
Looks like we need to use the same thumb print technology that they use in underdeveloped countries. A scan registered in a central clearing agency is the only way we are going to get away from the chronic cheating that Democrats seem to have mastered.
23 posted on
10/29/2002 12:02:29 PM PST by
MHT
To: Dan from Michigan
Both Williams and State Elections Director Chris Thomas say their efforts are hindered by federal laws saying that even when a voter is suspected to no longer be at an address, that person's record can't be purged until after two federal election cycles.
Who wants to bet that it wasn't the Democrat machine that put this law in place?
24 posted on
10/29/2002 12:09:43 PM PST by
Bush2000
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson