Skip to comments.
Detroit's voter rolls in question (too many registered)
Detroit News ^
| Oct 29
| Darci McConnell
Posted on 10/29/2002 6:44:36 AM PST by Dan from Michigan
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:09:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
DETROIT -- Despite having died eight years ago, Kathe Beddow still retains one mortal privilege: The right to vote.
The city Elections Department in July sent Beddow a voter registration card, even though she hasn't voted in more than a decade. She is also still listed as a registered voter with the Secretary of State's Office.
(Excerpt) Read more at detnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: deadvote; democraps; detroit; fraud; pledge; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
We need poll watchers and challengers. If you are interested, please vote absentee, and then contact the State GOP at 1-866-MIGOP-02.
To: Dan from Michigan
And bring a camera with you to snap pictures of the van drivers, and lawyers herding the "base" into the precincts.
2
posted on
10/29/2002 6:49:15 AM PST
by
mgc1122
To: mgc1122
Yea Detroit will be a main voting block for the RATS here in Michigan. If there were no Detroit Michigan would be Democrat free in elected seats. The RATS will be bussing people in to cast votes. We need some poll watchers down there.
3
posted on
10/29/2002 6:53:02 AM PST
by
Jon Geb
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
ping
To: Jon Geb
Yep. BTW - Notice any changes at D-19 and I-96???
To: Dan from Michigan
Maybe the reason why so many dead people vote is because election day is only a week away from Holloween. :P
The fix is in. Create a confused atmosphere so you can mold it into a favorable outcome through litigation.
6
posted on
10/29/2002 7:08:30 AM PST
by
rudypoot
To: Dan from Michigan; All
7
posted on
10/29/2002 7:16:30 AM PST
by
backhoe
To: Dan from Michigan
Out dated and wholly inaccurate voter registrations are a big problem all over the country. In Durham NC (the city and the county) there are more registered voters than there are adults over the age of 18 residing there.
But even attempt to clean them up and the ACLU and the NAALCP swoops in and cries racism and 'civil rights!'
To: Dan from Michigan
IT'S 7 DAYS UNTIL THE ELECTION. WILL IT STILL BE HER SENATE?
GOOD INTENTIONS DON'T WIN ELECTIONS.
ACTION DOES. ACT TODAY.
TakeBackCongress.org
A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate
9
posted on
10/29/2002 7:40:24 AM PST
by
ffrancone
To: Dan from Michigan
Hmmmm...Voter turnout of 150% DOES sound a bit high, don't you think?
To: Jon Geb
"Yea Detroit will be a main voting block for the RATS here in Michigan. If there were no Detroit Michigan would be Democrat free in elected seats. The RATS will be bussing people in to cast votes. We need some poll watchers down there." NO, what Detroit needs is a good election-eve party sponsored by one of Jim Jones' deciples!
11
posted on
10/29/2002 7:51:03 AM PST
by
harpu
To: *Vote Fraud
To: Dan from Michigan
With the 2000 U.S. Census recording the city as having a population of 655,561 people of voting age, Williams' count would mean that 93 percent of the city's residents who can vote are registered. When you count in those (felons, etc) that cannot vote, it probably means 100+% are registered.
13
posted on
10/29/2002 7:54:04 AM PST
by
cinFLA
To: Dan from Michigan
But...but...how can this be?!
14
posted on
10/29/2002 7:56:06 AM PST
by
CaptRon
To: cinFLA
Which means that Detroit, plus just one other city that has a similar scale of fraud,
would account for the entire Democrat popular vote margin! This has to be resolved by legal means, or it will get ugly. People don't like it when their nation is being stolen from them.
15
posted on
10/29/2002 8:04:12 AM PST
by
eno_
To: Dan from Michigan
One simple solution would be to have a law that removes a person from the rolls if they did not vote in the previous election.
Yes, that means you would need to re-register if you missed an election.
The second reform would be to require ID to vote. I have no problem showing my Id to vote, especially if it cuts down on voter fraud.
This may not eliminate voter fraud, but there is no reason to make it easy for the crooks.
To: CIB-173RDABN
I agree with you 100%, but the Democrats depend on criminals and thugs for their votes. This would be declared unfair, since the Democratic Party itself is about 75% criminal anyway.
To: Dan from Michigan
great article, thanks for posting it
18
posted on
10/29/2002 8:37:12 AM PST
by
Gothmog
To: Dan from Michigan
The Stupid Party strikes again. Vote fraud is a big problem in Michigan and I believe it cost Michigan a US Senate seat (Spence Abrahams) and cost Bush Michigan, when a huge number of votes came in from Wayne County (Detroit) late on election night.
They could've struck while the iron was hot after the Florida 2000 debacle to set up a secure, fraud-free voting system. But nooooo! They're afraid of confronting the Mafia, oops, Democrats.
To: Dan from Michigan
Duh,did anybody see Carter's campaign advisor( I forgot his name(over 40 moment)) question the 200k plurality in Detroit on Chris Matthews election night 2000?
20
posted on
10/29/2002 9:25:45 AM PST
by
CPT Clay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson