Skip to comments.
Hanover County Shooting [Ashland, Virginia- North of Richmond]
Posted on 10/19/2002 6:14:56 PM PDT by William McKinley
Just reported. Took place outside of a Ponderosa Steakhouse. Not sure if it is related or not at this time. Police have shut down parts of I-95.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680 ... 2,861-2,862 next last
To: Mulder; rintense
Private citizens could also be encouraged, by the gov't, to pursue the goblins, or even shoot at them (if circumstances warranted) without fear of prosecution. Another proponent of "Don't stop traffic, it's against my Constitutional rights, but definitely SHOOT EVERYONE!!!"
To: Eva
FBI guy is already there.
1,642
posted on
10/19/2002 9:28:53 PM PDT
by
abner
To: AGreatPer
I have wondered, in this war I think it is clear they can't invade and capture OUR country, therefore they must be trying to achieve a victory much like the Tet Offensive did for the NVA. The Tet Offensive was a coordinated attack throughout South Vietnam, it effectively killed support for the war at home in the states even though it was eventually repulsed. It was a great political victory for the NVA. Unless AQ has gotten their hands on a bunch of nukes or nasty bio or chems, I would suspect that would be their plan, small coordinated attacks throughout the country. This could just be a warm up. Hell it worked for the NVA.
1,643
posted on
10/19/2002 9:29:04 PM PDT
by
SCR1
John Thompson, FBI, agent in charge, present at media conference; no military info being released, ie., whether military planes in air.
To: rintense
Yes I think so too. I like these guys. :)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Do you mean the sack of Hampton and the Burning of Washington?
To: Darlin'
Didn't they catch a terrorist in Belgium the other day that said that they were training Al-Queda snipers in Afganastan to attack in the US?
To: Howlin
You'd rather DIE than open your car trunk? It's the prinicpal
1,648
posted on
10/19/2002 9:29:30 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: John H K
Good observation John H K.
When you come down to it, the teacher is proabably correct. We're just scropping for staws. (or is it it gropping?)
To: abner
FBI guy is already there. I think we will be seeing ALOT more of him.
To: ExSoldier
I teach American history and we have never fought a FOREIGN enemy on our own shores...all the combatants in the civil war were Americans! Didn't the British burn Washington during the War of 1812? Wasn't General Pershing chasing Pancho Villa around Arizona or New Mexico prior to WW I?
To: Mulder
I somehow just cannot imagine if this were happening in George Washington's time or Patrick Henry's time, that, when learning that someone had been shot by an enemy (most likely) he would say, "Well don't ask my help! I have my rights you know!"
Their response would have been "How can I help? Martha, get me my gun!"
To: ExSoldier
Many of those engagements were naval---a fact that contributed to the start of the war....the illegal impressment of American sailors into British service
The main reason the war started is that a lot of Americans wanted to take Canada from Britain. The impressment helped turn public opinion against Britain, but it largely was a convenient excuse to attempt to invade Canada.
The congressmen from the Northeast coastal regions that had their citizens being impressed were OPPOSED to the war (because it basically ended American international trade for years); the people that were FOR the war were southerners and "westerners" inland, that were keen on invading Canada.
To: JHrules
Report to your nearest police station with all of your .223 rifles, and bring your papers please.
To: Howlin
To: Lessismore
Didn't the British burn Washington during the War of 1812? Wasn't General Pershing chasing Pancho Villa around Arizona or New Mexico prior to WW I?
If memory serves I believe Pancho waltzed across the border and burned down a town in New Mexico.
Comment #1,657 Removed by Moderator
To: Arkinsaw
It sounds like the one you're making; if you think it's logical, that's on you.
To: ExSoldier
And the British were just exactly what? But I think I get your point.
To: twntaipan
"There is no greater right than the right to actually live--all others are meaningless if that one cannot be guaranteed."Actually there is a greater right than the right to just live, and that is: The right to live in freedom and liberty, with the ability to think freely and to believe in the Truth, not some government-sanctioned politically-correct dogma.
1,660
posted on
10/19/2002 9:31:07 PM PDT
by
semaj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680 ... 2,861-2,862 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson