Posted on 10/14/2002 6:16:24 AM PDT by SJackson
The most pressing question we must ask in changing the West’s distorted image of Islam and Muslims is “What must we do?”
It is first necessary to respond to those who see no benefit to be gained by the change. We must remind Westerners of their own responsibility — that they shoulder some of the burden in correcting the mistakes of the past centuries. It is also necessary to point to opportunities for making changes so that we will not sink into despair or play into the hands of those who, for whatever reasons, wish there never to be harmony between us and the West.
The task is large indeed. The current tendency to use only “painkillers” to confront the anti-Islamic campaigns will not do. We have tried them; they were weak and trifling and proved woefully ineffective. What we mean by “painkillers” is paid ads in foreign newspapers and multimillion-dollar PR campaigns which lead to our being mocked. In many cases, these simply have the opposite effect from what was intended and we continue to be mocked and laughed at for our naivete and belief that money will solve the problem. We are today in need of “popular diplomacy” — building bridges with nations and not governments.
We must not think that we can change our image by means of the media alone. More than that is required; we must reach the Western mind using means and methods suited to that mind. Westerners themselves believe that there has been a deficiency in defining Islam in the West. In fact, 71 percent of Americans said that there was a deficiency; in Britain and Germany 55 percent and in France 47 percent had the same opinion. Who is responsible for this deficiency? We ourselves are to blame.
What are we required to do? Sheikh Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais recently said in a Friday sermon in Al-Haram Al-Sharif that what is required is to adopt what he called “the cultural Islamic project”. It is a project that seeks to “move the cause forward, correct the image, coordinate efforts and stands and propagate good will, kindness and mercy as well as building a spirit of cooperation, honesty and understanding thereby promoting humanity.” It is a project to be adopted by all the Ummah because its objective is a broad and all-inclusive one and not specific to one country or group.
What we must first realize is that changing our image in the West must be based on “producing an alternative image” rather than by reacting to, and patching up, existing image. Rather than drown in refuting lies and misinformation, we must present accurate information in a full and complete form. We must embark upon a long-range plan rather than a short-term action.
The second thing is for these efforts to be aimed at the grass roots of Western society rather than at politicians and decision-makers. There is no difficulty in reaching these people because of advances in technology, telecommunications, media and the Internet. Thirdly, the action must be multipronged: working in the media, working on the cultural and diplomatic front, personal contacts in addition to all possibilities found in the West. Despite the importance of the media and its effect, there are other means such as universities, educational institutions and religious organizations. The role of these cannot be ignored in our quest.
Fourthly, fellow Muslims living in the West and Muslims who are natives of those countries must be in the forefront of this project. They have more knowledge of the reality and they also have more credibility with their fellow citizens. We in the Muslim world must encourage Western Muslims to integrate fully into the society they live in, thereby becoming effective in influencing it. We must support and aid them and make every effort to help so that they feel secure and so that Western governments will know that they are not unprotected and that behind them stands an Ummah (people) of weight and consequence.
Finally, we must once again say that the West will never listen to us if we continue our present approach. Our efforts will be wasted if we use the “apologist” approach that strips Islam of its values so that it fits what the West wants from us. Our efforts will also be wasted if we use a hostile extremist approach that presents Islam as aggressive and antagonistic toward the West, seeking to destroy it and build an Islamic civilization on its ruins.
We must instead present Islam as a message of guidance and mercy to all people and one that will bring them peace and blessings. We should describe it as a philosophy and system that would contribute to finding workable solutions for many problems of the modern world. It opens the possibility of a new way of life calling for understanding between nations and dialogue between civilizations that establishes the basis of understanding, cooperation, and coexistence regardless of race or religion. We are in no doubt that if we present Islam in this light, the true light as God wished, then we would gain much both now and in the future.
Sorry, Mahathir, that is where you are mistaken, we understand "Islam the religion of peace (tm) all too well! Us "infidels" realize that your so-called prophet mohammead and the so-called "holy quran" (caps purposely omitted) offer us infidels who do not believe in your false god allah or his false prophet mohammad only one of three choices.
1) Convert to "Islam the religion of peace (tm)" by choice or by force.
2) Become slaves, subjugated to Islamic masters, subject to Islamic law.
3) If we reject choices 1 and 2, our final choice according to "Islam the religion of peace (tm) is to die for our faith, or lack thereof.
Sorry, we are not interested in circumcising our females or killing the Jews (the chosen people of the True and living God, Jehovah) etc. Instead we have chosen to "fight for the right to live in freedom.
Mahathir said that Falwell, as a religious leader, had no right to make such a statement, but added: "I'm not going to accuse all Christians. Only one person made such (a) statement."
I am a Christian and a student of history and the truth of history is this: mohammad WAS A TERRORIST and Islam is NOT A RELIGION OF PEACE BUT THE SWORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And guess what, there are MILLIONS of well educated and INFORMED Christians who agree with these statements!
Malaysia's minister in charge of Muslim affairs commented that CBS should not take the risk of hurting Muslim feelings by broadcasting the interview. He advised Falwell to learn more about the religion.
September 11, 01 and the lack of remorse and support for America by followers and leaders of "Islam the religion of peace (tm)" taught us all we need to know.
"We Muslims have never said anything against any other prophet. So why do people say things about our prophet,"
That is a flat out LIE, you have openly declared that Jesus Christ is NOT the Son of God, but merely a prophet who's message is subservient to that of mohammad. We are saying these things because mohammad was in fact both a false prophet AND a terrorist, who used the sword to gain converts and who has inspired his disciples to follow his bloody example by killing infidels who will not submit to "Islam the religion of peace (tm).
Amen to that!
And as for mohammed, (Piss be upon his name)
What, the big pretty mosques and feigned piety don't make them look righteous? Who'd a thunk...
Yeah, rrrrright ! In case Dr. Abdul Qader Tash hasn't noticed, westerners aren't exactly flocking to Arab countries. That ought to be his first clue. A few more points he should keep in mind. Barbarianism is out.... hasn't been trendy for centuries. It is 2002, keep up. Clean your house of the vermin. Take a bath. Get a new wardrobe consultant, that dishrag thingie is so passe. Contribute something of value to society on occasion. Condemn violence and fanaticism. Deprogram - you're a cult.
We are all children of God, He has no grandchildren...
Besides renouncing it immediately and completely, the answer is....nothing. At this point, the situation is way beyond repair. Islam needs to be annihilated.
What we see loudly and emphatically contradicts what you say. (Well, in the Arabic mind, words are sufficient substitutes for reality.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.